Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Surgical outcomes and national comprehensive cancer network compliance in advanced ovarian cancer surgery in a low volume military treatment facility.
Phippen, Neil T; Barnett, Jason C; Lowery, William J; Miller, Caela R; Leath, Charles A.
Afiliación
  • Phippen NT; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of OB/GYN, San Antonio Military Medical Center, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Gynecol Oncol ; 131(1): 158-62, 2013 Oct.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23872110
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the optimal cytoreduction (OPT) rate, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) treatment guideline compliance rate and patient outcomes for advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients at our low volume institution.

METHODS:

Following IRB approval, records of patients with Stage III-IV EOC, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube carcinoma completing both primary surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy were reviewed. Patient demographics, clinicopathologic variables, cytoreduction status (optimal or suboptimal), NCCN treatment guideline compliance, and survival were reviewed. Standard statistical tests including the t-test, Chi-square or Fisher's exact test and Kaplan-Meier Survival curves were utilized.

RESULTS:

Overall, 48 patients met all inclusion criteria. 35(73%) and 13 (27%) achieved optimal and suboptimal cytoreduction, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) for all patients was 37.1 months (95% CI 23.2 - 51.1 months) and NCCN treatment guideline compliance was 85.4%. Compared to sub-optimally cytoreduced patients the optimally cytoreduced patients were significantly older (62.2 vs. 53.5 yrs; p=0.015); no other significant clinicopathologic differences were observed between the two groups. 19 of 48 (39.6%) patients enrolled in an upfront cooperative group trial. Median OS was 43.4 months for optimally compared to 15.6 months in sub-optimally cytoreduced patients (p=0.012).

CONCLUSIONS:

NCCN treatment guideline compliance, OPT, and median OS rates in our low volume institution are similar to those reported nationally, and argue against using volume alone as a rationale for centralization of care.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Ováricas / Neoplasias Peritoneales / Carcinoma / Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales / Adhesión a Directriz / Neoplasias de las Trompas Uterinas / Hospitales de Bajo Volumen / Hospitales Militares Tipo de estudio: Guideline País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Gynecol Oncol Año: 2013 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Ováricas / Neoplasias Peritoneales / Carcinoma / Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales / Adhesión a Directriz / Neoplasias de las Trompas Uterinas / Hospitales de Bajo Volumen / Hospitales Militares Tipo de estudio: Guideline País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Gynecol Oncol Año: 2013 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos