Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of an automated thermodynamic treatment (LipiFlow®) system for meibomian gland dysfunction: a prospective, randomized, observer-masked trial.
Finis, David; Hayajneh, Jasmin; König, Claudia; Borrelli, Maria; Schrader, Stefan; Geerling, Gerd.
Afiliación
  • Finis D; Department of Ophthalmology, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany. Electronic address: David.Finis@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
  • Hayajneh J; Department of Ophthalmology, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • König C; Department of Ophthalmology, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Borrelli M; Department of Ophthalmology, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Schrader S; Department of Ophthalmology, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Geerling G; Department of Ophthalmology, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Ocul Surf ; 12(2): 146-54, 2014 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24725326
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To compare the effectiveness of a single LipiFlow(®) treatment with combined lid warming and massage in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD).

METHODS:

In this prospective, randomized, crossover, observer-masked clinical trial, subjects were randomized to receive either a single 12-min LipiFlow-LipiFlow Thermal Pulsation (LTP) system treatment or to perform combined twice-daily lid warming and massage for 3 months. All subjects were examined before, and 1 and 3 months after initiation of treatments. Investigated parameters included subjective symptoms, lipid layer thickness, meibomian gland assessment, tear break-up time, tear osmolarity, corneal and conjunctival staining, Schirmer test values, and tear meniscus height.

RESULTS:

A total of 31 subjects completed the 3-month follow-up. At 1 and 3 months, patients in the LipiFlow treatment group had a significant reduction in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) scores compared with those in the lid-margin hygiene group. Both treatments produced a significant improvement in expressible meibomian glands compared to the baseline parameters, but no significant difference was noted between the two groups. The other investigated objective parameters did not show a significant difference.

CONCLUSION:

Results of our study show that a single LipiFlow treatment is as least as effective as a 3-month, twice-daily lid margin hygiene regimen for MGD. However, the present study was observer-masked only, and therefore a placebo effect may have confounded any improvements in subjective symptoms and other parameters in both groups.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI: Terapias_manuales / Masoterapia Asunto principal: Síndromes de Ojo Seco / Enfermedades de los Párpados / Hipertermia Inducida / Masaje / Glándulas Tarsales Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Ocul Surf Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI: Terapias_manuales / Masoterapia Asunto principal: Síndromes de Ojo Seco / Enfermedades de los Párpados / Hipertermia Inducida / Masaje / Glándulas Tarsales Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Ocul Surf Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article