Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation of Recipes for Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Challenges With Milk, Egg White, and Hazelnut.
González-Mancebo, E; Alonso Díaz de Durana, M D; García Estringana, Y; Meléndez Baltanás, A; Rodriguez-Alvarez, M; de la Hoz Caballer, B; Del Prado, N; Fernández-Rivas, M.
Afiliación
  • González-Mancebo E; Allergy Department, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain.
  • Alonso Díaz de Durana MD; Allergy Department, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.
  • García Estringana Y; Allergy Department, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.
  • Meléndez Baltanás A; Allergy Department, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain.
  • Rodriguez-Alvarez M; Allergy Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain.
  • de la Hoz Caballer B; Allergy Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain.
  • Del Prado N; Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Preventive Medicine Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain.
  • Fernández-Rivas M; Allergy Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28211344
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) is considered the definitive diagnostic test for food allergy. Nevertheless, validated recipes for masking the foods are scarce, have not been standardized, and differ between centers. Sensory evaluation techniques such as the triangle test are necessary to validate the recipes used for DBPCFC.

METHODS:

We developed 3 recipes for use in DBPCFC with milk, egg white, and hazelnut and used the triangle test to validate them in a 2-phase study in which 197 volunteers participated. In each phase, participants tried 3 samples (2 active-1 placebo or 2 placebo-1 active) and had to identify the odd one. In phase 1, the 3 samples were given simultaneously, whereas in phase 2, the 3 samples of foods that failed validation in phase 1 were given sequentially. A visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 1 to 10 was used to evaluate how much participants liked the recipes.

RESULTS:

In phase 1, the egg white recipe was validated (n=89 volunteers, 38.9% found the odd sample, P=.16). Milk and hazelnut recipes were validated in phase 2 (for both foods, n=30 participants, 36.7% found the odd sample, P=.36). Median VAS scores for the 3 recipes ranged from 6.6 to 9.7.

CONCLUSIONS:

We used sensory testing to validate milk, egg white, and hazelnut recipes for use in DBPCFC. The validated recipes are easy to prepare in a clinical setting, provide the equivalent of 1 serving dose, and were liked by most participants.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pruebas Inmunológicas / Proteínas del Huevo / Hipersensibilidad a la Leche / Hipersensibilidad al Huevo / Hipersensibilidad a la Nuez / Preparaciones de Plantas / Corylus / Proteínas de la Leche Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pruebas Inmunológicas / Proteínas del Huevo / Hipersensibilidad a la Leche / Hipersensibilidad al Huevo / Hipersensibilidad a la Nuez / Preparaciones de Plantas / Corylus / Proteínas de la Leche Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España