Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Asthma treatment and outcomes for children in the emergency department and hospital.
Drewek, Rupali; Mirea, Lucia; Rao, Aparna; Touresian, Peter; Adelson, Philip David.
Afiliación
  • Drewek R; a Phoenix Children's Hospital , Phoenix , AZ , USA.
  • Mirea L; a Phoenix Children's Hospital , Phoenix , AZ , USA.
  • Rao A; a Phoenix Children's Hospital , Phoenix , AZ , USA.
  • Touresian P; a Phoenix Children's Hospital , Phoenix , AZ , USA.
  • Adelson PD; a Phoenix Children's Hospital , Phoenix , AZ , USA.
J Asthma ; 55(6): 603-608, 2018 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28820610
OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare the treatment of acute asthma exacerbations in children given in the emergency department (ED) and admitted to acute care floor in the hospital or intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: A retrospective chart review of visits for acute exacerbation of asthma treated at Phoenix Children's Hospital between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2016. RESULTS: A total of 287 asthma exacerbation cases were identified including 106 (37%) ED visits, 134 (47%) hospital floor and 47 (16%) ICU admissions. A history of a previous ED visit (ED 88%, Floor 60% and ICU 68%; p < 0.0001) and prior pulmonology inpatient consultation (ED 30%, Floor 19% and ICU 15%; p = 0.05) varied significantly. Pulmonology inpatient consultations were performed more frequently in the ICU than on the hospital floor (54% versus 8%; p < 0.0001). Although overall 145 (51%) of the cases were already on inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) at the time of visit with no differences across locations, ICS initiation/step-up was greater in the ICU (72%) than on the hospital floor (54%) and ED (2%) (p < 0.0001). A recommendation given to the family for follow-up with pulmonology was more frequent for patients who had been admitted to the ICU (68%) as compared to those only admitted to the floor (31%) or ED (4%) (p < 0.0001). Readmission rates were similar for patients previously admitted to the hospital (Floor 42%; ICU 40%), but significantly higher for previous ED visits (77%) (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Physicians in the ED have an opportunity to provide preventative care in the acute care setting and should be encouraged to initiate treatment with ICS. Consideration should be given to develop a program or clinical pathway focused on long-term asthma management and maintenance to reduce readmissions and long hospital stays.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI: Plantas_medicinales Asunto principal: Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud / Asma / Vías Clínicas / Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital / Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Asthma Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI: Plantas_medicinales Asunto principal: Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud / Asma / Vías Clínicas / Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital / Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Asthma Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos