Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of the self-efficacy-enhancing active cycle of breathing technique on lung cancer patients with lung resection: A quasi-experimental trial.
Yang, Mei; Zhong, Jiu-di; Zhang, Jun-E; Huang, Xiao-Xiao; Li, Chuan-Zhen; Hong, Zhang-Xiang; Zhang, Si-Wen.
Afiliación
  • Yang M; School of Nursing, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Zhong JD; Cancer Centre, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Zhang JE; School of Nursing, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. Electronic address: zhangje@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
  • Huang XX; Cancer Centre, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Li CZ; Cancer Centre, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Hong ZX; Cancer Centre, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Zhang SW; Cancer Centre, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Eur J Oncol Nurs ; 34: 1-7, 2018 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29784132
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Enhancing self-efficacy during the active cycle of breathing technique is essential for realizing the full benefit of pulmonary rehabilitation among lung cancer patients. This study aimed to explore the effect of self-efficacy-enhancing active cycle of breathing technique (SEE-ACBT) among patients with lung resection.

METHOD:

A quasi-experimental trial with a pre-post test design was performed. The control group (n = 81) received routine perioperative care, and the intervention group (n = 81) received SEE-ACBT in addition to routine perioperative care. The primary outcome measure was 24-h wet sputum weight. Other outcomes included the 6-min walk test (6MWT), Borg scale, postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC), exercise self-efficacy, hospitalization cost, duration of oxygen inhalation, and days of postoperative hospital stay.

RESULTS:

The sputum weight in the intervention group gradually increased from postoperative day 1, day 2, to day 3 and was significantly higher than that of the control group on day 2 and day 3 (P = 0.000). An average of ¥5047 (US$ 767.6) in hospitalization costs was saved in the intervention group (P = 0.003). Exercise self-efficacy (79. 0 VS 71.7,P = 0.006), 6MWT (471.8 m VS 371.6 m,P = 0.000), and duration of oxygen inhalation (33.9 h VS 53.1 h, P = 0.000) among patients in the intervention group improved significantly compared with the control group. No significant differences in PPC and days of postoperative hospital stay were found.

CONCLUSIONS:

SEE-ACBT is an effective and economical short-term pulmonary rehabilitation method. Pulmonary rehabilitation should focus on increasing motivational behaviours. Further studies should be implemented to explore the long-term effects of SEE-ACBT.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones Posoperatorias / Terapia Respiratoria / Ejercicios Respiratorios / Autoeficacia / Neoplasias Pulmonares Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Oncol Nurs Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones Posoperatorias / Terapia Respiratoria / Ejercicios Respiratorios / Autoeficacia / Neoplasias Pulmonares Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Oncol Nurs Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China