Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Surgery Is Associated With Survival Benefit in T4a Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A National Analysis.
Raman, Vignesh; Jawitz, Oliver K; Voigt, Soraya L; Farrow, Norma E; Yang, Chi-Fu J; D'Amico, Thomas A; Harpole, David H.
Afiliación
  • Raman V; Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. Electronic address: vignesh.raman@duke.edu.
  • Jawitz OK; Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Voigt SL; Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Farrow NE; Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Yang CJ; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California.
  • D'Amico TA; Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Harpole DH; Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 108(6): 1633-1639, 2019 12.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31356800
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend consideration of surgery for clinical T4a esophageal adenocarcinoma. There are limited data on the outcomes of patients with T4a adenocarcinoma treated with surgery vs definitive chemoradiation, however.

METHODS:

The National Cancer Database was used to identify patients from 2010-2015 with clinical T4aN0-3M0 esophageal adenocarcinoma, and grouped by receipt of surgery (with or without perioperative therapy) or definitive, concurrent chemoradiation. Patients receiving incomplete definitive therapy or with missing survival information were excluded. Overall survival was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard analyses.

RESULTS:

Of 182 patients in the study, 85 (47%) underwent esophagectomy and 97 (53%) underwent chemoradiation. In the surgery cohort, 79 patients (93%) received perioperative chemotherapy. Unadjusted and multivariable analyses demonstrated a significant survival benefit associated with surgery compared with definitive chemoradiotherapy (adjusted hazard ratio 0.32; 95% confidence interval 0.21, 0.50). A 11 propensity score-matched analysis of 63 patient pairs also revealed a significant overall survival benefit with surgery compared with chemoradiotherapy alone (hazard ratio 0.26; 95% confidence interval 0.16, 0.43).

CONCLUSIONS:

In this national analysis, surgery for cT4a esophageal adenocarcinoma was associated with improved outcomes when compared with definitive chemoradiation. Surgery should be considered for medically fit patients with cT4aN0-3M0 esophageal adenocarcinoma.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Esofágicas / Adenocarcinoma / Vigilancia de la Población / Esofagectomía / Estadificación de Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies País/Región como asunto: America do norte / Caribe / Puerto rico Idioma: En Revista: Ann Thorac Surg Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Esofágicas / Adenocarcinoma / Vigilancia de la Población / Esofagectomía / Estadificación de Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies País/Región como asunto: America do norte / Caribe / Puerto rico Idioma: En Revista: Ann Thorac Surg Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article