Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Survivorship objectives in comprehensive cancer control plans: a systematic review.
Mollica, Michelle A; Falisi, Angela L; Geiger, Ann M; Jacobsen, Paul B; Lunsford, Natasha Buchanan; Pratt-Chapman, Mandi L; Townsend, Julie S; Nekhlyudov, Larissa.
Afiliación
  • Mollica MA; Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892-9762, USA. michelle.mollica@nih.gov.
  • Falisi AL; Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892-9762, USA.
  • Geiger AM; Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892-9762, USA.
  • Jacobsen PB; Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892-9762, USA.
  • Lunsford NB; Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Pratt-Chapman ML; George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Townsend JS; Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Nekhlyudov L; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
J Cancer Surviv ; 14(2): 235-243, 2020 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31953645
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Over a decade ago, the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) recommended that states develop, implement, and evaluate plans that include consideration of survivorship care. The purpose of this study was to review comprehensive cancer control plans in the USA, specifically to identify the inclusion of cancer survivorship-focused goals and objectives and examine alignment of survivorship-focused objectives with the NAM recommendations.

METHODS:

Plans from 50 states, 7 territories, 5 tribal organizations, and the District of Columbia were reviewed to assess inclusion of survivorship goals and objectives. One territory plan was excluded because it did not include a survivorship-focused goal or objective (final n = 62). Objectives were assigned to domains based on NAM survivorship recommendations.

RESULTS:

Plans included between 1 and 19 survivorship-related objectives. Of the 345 survivorship objectives extracted and analyzed, the most prevalent domains addressed were raising awareness, survivorship care plans, healthcare professional capacity, and models of coordinated care. Employment-related concerns, developing and implementing quality measures, and investments in research were not frequently included in objectives.

CONCLUSIONS:

Comprehensive cancer control plans represent an important strategy that may reduce the impact of cancer and its treatment. State, territorial, and tribal coalitions can use these results to systematically focus future survivorship efforts on areas relevant to their region and population. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS The growing number of survivors requires broad-ranging policy strategies. Future efforts are needed to assess the implementation and impact of plan strategies to improve the overall wellness of cancer survivors.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Supervivencia / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: J Cancer Surviv Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Supervivencia / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: J Cancer Surviv Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos