Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Benchmarking biopharmaceutical process development and manufacturing cost contributions to R&D.
Farid, Suzanne S; Baron, Max; Stamatis, Christos; Nie, Wenhao; Coffman, Jon.
Afiliación
  • Farid SS; The Advanced Centre for Biochemical Engineering, Department of Biochemical Engineering, University College London , London, UK.
  • Baron M; The Advanced Centre for Biochemical Engineering, Department of Biochemical Engineering, University College London , London, UK.
  • Stamatis C; The Advanced Centre for Biochemical Engineering, Department of Biochemical Engineering, University College London , London, UK.
  • Nie W; The Advanced Centre for Biochemical Engineering, Department of Biochemical Engineering, University College London , London, UK.
  • Coffman J; Biopharmaceutical Development, AstraZeneca , Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
MAbs ; 12(1): 1754999, 2020.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32449439
ABSTRACT
This study aims to benchmark and analyze the process development and manufacturing costs across the biopharmaceutical drug development cycle and their contribution to overall research and development (R&D) costs. This was achieved with a biopharmaceutical drug development lifecycle cost model that captured the costs, durations, risks and interdependencies of the clinical, process development and manufacturing activities. The budgets needed for process development and manufacturing at each phase of development to ensure a market success each year were estimated. The impact of different clinical success rate profiles on the process development and manufacturing costs at each stage was investigated, with a particular focus on monoclonal antibodies. To ensure a market success each year with an overall clinical success rate (Phase I to approval) of ~12%, the model predicted that a biopharmaceutical company needs to allocate process development and manufacturing budgets in the order of ~$60 M for pre-clinical to Phase II material preparation and ~$70 M for Phase III to regulatory review material preparation. For lower overall clinical success rates of ~4%, which are more indicative of diseases such as Alzheimer's, these values increase to ~$190 M for early-phase and ~$140 Mfor late-phase material preparation; hence, the costs increase 2.5 fold. The costs for process development and manufacturing per market success were predicted to represent 13-17% of the R&D budget from pre-clinical trials to approval. The results of this quantitative structured cost study can be used to aid decision-making during portfolio management and budget planning procedures in biopharmaceutical development.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Productos Biológicos / Aprobación de Drogas / Benchmarking / Industria Farmacéutica / Desarrollo de Medicamentos / Anticuerpos Monoclonales Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: MAbs Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Productos Biológicos / Aprobación de Drogas / Benchmarking / Industria Farmacéutica / Desarrollo de Medicamentos / Anticuerpos Monoclonales Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: MAbs Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido