Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Acceptability and preferences for self-collected screening for cervical cancer within health systems in rural Uganda: A mixed-methods approach.
Rawat, Angeli; Sanders, Catherine; Mithani, Nadia; Amuge, Catherine; Pedersen, Heather; Namugosa, Ruth; Payne, Beth; Mitchell-Foster, Sheona; Orem, Jackson; Ogilvie, Gina; Nakisige, Carolyn.
Afiliación
  • Rawat A; School of Population and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Sanders C; Women's Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Mithani N; Women's Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Amuge C; Women's Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Pedersen H; Uganda Cancer Institute, Kampala, Uganda.
  • Namugosa R; Women's Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Payne B; Uganda Cancer Institute, Kampala, Uganda.
  • Mitchell-Foster S; Women's Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Orem J; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, BC, Canada.
  • Ogilvie G; Uganda Cancer Institute, Kampala, Uganda.
  • Nakisige C; School of Population and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 152(1): 103-111, 2021 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33128778
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To understand the knowledge, preferences, and barriers for self-collected cervical cancer screening (SC-CCS) and follow-up care at the individual and health system level to inform the implementation of community-based SC-CCS.

METHODS:

Surveys and focus group discussions (FGDs) with women and FGDs with healthcare providers were conducted in Uganda. Survey data were analyzed using frequencies and FGD data were analyzed using thematic content analysis. Data were triangulated between methods.

RESULTS:

Sixty-four women were surveyed and 58 participated in FGDs. Facilitators to screening access included decentralization, convenience, privacy, confidentiality, knowledge, and education. Barriers to accessing screening included lack of transportation and knowledge, long wait times, difficulty accessing health care, and lack of trust in the health system. Additional implementation challenges included insufficiently trained human resources and lack of infrastructure.

CONCLUSION:

Integrating SC-CCS within rural health systems in low-resource settings has been under-evaluated. Community-based SC-CSS could prevent high cervical cancer-related mortalities while working within the human and financial resource limitations of rural health systems. SC-CCS is acceptable to women and healthcare providers. By addressing rural women's preferences and barriers to care, decision-makers can build health systems that provide community-centered care close to women's homes across the care continuum.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Papillomaviridae / Autocuidado / Displasia del Cuello del Útero / Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino / Cooperación del Paciente / Infecciones por Papillomavirus Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Screening_studies País/Región como asunto: Africa Idioma: En Revista: Int J Gynaecol Obstet Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Papillomaviridae / Autocuidado / Displasia del Cuello del Útero / Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino / Cooperación del Paciente / Infecciones por Papillomavirus Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Screening_studies País/Región como asunto: Africa Idioma: En Revista: Int J Gynaecol Obstet Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá