Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Long-term results of sacral neuromodulation for the treatment of anorectal diseases.
Duchalais, E; Drissi, F; Delestre, M; Wyart, V; Lehur, P-A; Meurette, G.
Afiliación
  • Duchalais E; Cancer, Digestive and Endocrine Surgery Clinic, Institute of Digestive Disease, University Hospital Center Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France.
  • Drissi F; Cancer, Digestive and Endocrine Surgery Clinic, Institute of Digestive Disease, University Hospital Center Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France.
  • Delestre M; Cancer, Digestive and Endocrine Surgery Clinic, Institute of Digestive Disease, University Hospital Center Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France.
  • Wyart V; Cancer, Digestive and Endocrine Surgery Clinic, Institute of Digestive Disease, University Hospital Center Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France.
  • Lehur PA; Cancer, Digestive and Endocrine Surgery Clinic, Institute of Digestive Disease, University Hospital Center Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France.
  • Meurette G; Cancer, Digestive and Endocrine Surgery Clinic, Institute of Digestive Disease, University Hospital Center Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France. Electronic address: Guillaume.meurette@chu-nantes.fr.
J Visc Surg ; 159(6): 463-470, 2022 12.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34736877
INTRODUCTION: Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) aims to improve anorectal function in patients with disorders of anal continence and rectal emptying. The mechanism of action of SNM is not well known, and its indications are still under evaluation. We report the functional results and morbidity of a prospective cohort treated between 2002 and 2019. RESULTS: A total of 284 patients (of 423 tested) had implantation of a SNM. Five patients (1.8%) were lost to follow-up. Among those who had implantation, the indications for SNM were anal incontinence (n=376), refractory constipation (n=17), anterior resection syndrome (n=13), solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (n=7), and chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (n=10). The morbidity rate was 2.7% (Dindo-Clavien>2), 33 patients (11%) required explantation for infection (n=5), pain (n=2), inefficacy (n=24) or other reasons (rectal cancer) (n=3). It was necessary to change the stimulator in 68 patients (24%) during the follow-up period. Regarding the group of patients with anal incontinence, functional results showed improvement of the incontinence score in 40% and of quality of life in 25% after a mean follow-up of 55months. CONCLUSION: SNM constitutes a mini-invasive treatment associated with low morbidity. Its' efficacy in anal incontinence makes it a priority approach. Other indications are still under evaluation; while results are promising, they are highly variable.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedades del Recto / Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica / Incontinencia Fecal Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Visc Surg Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedades del Recto / Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica / Incontinencia Fecal Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Visc Surg Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia