Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A feasibility randomized controlled trial of a NICU rehabilitation program for very low birth weight infants.
Letzkus, Lisa; Conaway, Mark; Miller-Davis, Claiborne; Darring, Jodi; Keim-Malpass, Jessica; Zanelli, Santina.
Afiliación
  • Letzkus L; Division of Developmental Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA. lmc8c@virginia.edu.
  • Conaway M; University of Virginia Children's Hospital, PO BOX 800828, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA. lmc8c@virginia.edu.
  • Miller-Davis C; Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
  • Darring J; University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
  • Keim-Malpass J; Division of Developmental Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
  • Zanelli S; School of Nursing, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 1729, 2022 02 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35110644
Motor disability is common in children born preterm. Interventions focusing on environmental enrichment and emotional connection can positively impact outcomes. The NICU-based rehabilitation (NeoRehab) program consists of evidence-based interventions provided by a parent in addition to usual care. The program combines positive sensory experiences (vocal soothing, scent exchange, comforting touch, skin-to-skin care) as well as motor training (massage and physical therapy) in a gestational age (GA) appropriate fashion. To investigate the acceptability, feasibility and fidelity of the NeoRehab program in very low birthweight (VLBW) infants. All interventions were provided by parents in addition to usual care. Infants (≤ 32 weeks' GA and/or ≤ 1500 g birthweight) were enrolled in a randomized controlled trial comparing NeoRehab to usual care (03/2019-10/2020). The a priori dosing goal was for interventions to be performed 5 days/week. The primary outcomes were the acceptability, feasibility and fidelity of the NeoRehab program. 36 participants were randomized to the intervention group and 34 allocated to usual care. The recruitment rate was 71% and retention rate 98%. None of the interventions met the 5 days per week pre-established goal. 97% of participants documented performing a combination of interventions at least 3 times per week. The NeoRehab program was well received and acceptable to parents of VLBW infants. Programs that place a high demand on parents (5 days per week) are not feasible and goals of intervention at least 3 times per week appear to be feasible in the context of the United States. Parent-provided motor interventions were most challenging to parents and alternative strategies should be considered in future studies. Further studies are needed to evaluate the relationship between intervention dosing on long term motor outcomes.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI: Terapias_manuales / Masoterapia Asunto principal: Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal / Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal / Recién Nacido de muy Bajo Peso / Trastornos Motores Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI: Terapias_manuales / Masoterapia Asunto principal: Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal / Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal / Recién Nacido de muy Bajo Peso / Trastornos Motores Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos