Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Non-pharmacological interventions to manage psychological distress in patients living with cancer: a systematic review.
Paley, Carole A; Boland, Jason W; Santarelli, Martina; Murtagh, Fliss E M; Ziegler, Lucy; Chapman, Emma J.
Afiliación
  • Paley CA; University of Leeds, Academic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds, UK. c.a.paley@leeds.ac.uk.
  • Boland JW; Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
  • Santarelli M; Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
  • Murtagh FEM; Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
  • Ziegler L; University of Leeds, Academic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds, UK.
  • Chapman EJ; University of Leeds, Academic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds, UK.
BMC Palliat Care ; 22(1): 88, 2023 Jul 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37407974
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Psychological distress is common in patients with cancer; interfering with physical and psychological wellbeing, and hindering management of physical symptoms. Our aim was to systematically review published evidence on non-pharmacological interventions for cancer-related psychological distress, at all stages of the disease.

METHODS:

We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022311729). Searches were made using eight online databases to identify studies meeting our inclusion criteria. Data were collected on outcome measures, modes of delivery, resources and evidence of efficacy. A meta-analysis was planned if data allowed. Quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).

RESULTS:

Fifty-nine studies with 17,628 participants were included. One third of studies included mindfulness, talking or group therapies. Half of all studies reported statistically significant improvements in distress. Statistically significant intervention effects on distress were most prevalent for mindfulness techniques. Four of these mindfulness studies had moderate effect sizes (d = -0.71[95% CI -1.04, -0.37] p < 0.001) (d = -0.60 [95% CI -3.44, -0.89] p < 0.001) (d = -0.77 [CI -0.146, -1.954] p < 0.01) (d = -0.69 [CI -0.18, -1.19] p = 0.008) and one had a large effect size (d = -1.03 [95% CI -1.51, -0.54] p < 0.001). Heterogeneity of studies precluded meta-analysis. Study quality was variable and some had a high risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS:

The majority of studies using a mindfulness intervention in this review are efficacious at alleviating distress. Mindfulness-including brief, self-administered interventions-merits further investigation, using adequately powered, high-quality studies. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION This systematic review is registered on PROSPERO, number CRD42022311729.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI: Terapias_mente_y_cuerpo / Meditacion Asunto principal: Atención Plena / Distrés Psicológico / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: BMC Palliat Care Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI: Terapias_mente_y_cuerpo / Meditacion Asunto principal: Atención Plena / Distrés Psicológico / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: BMC Palliat Care Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido