Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Understanding the barriers and facilitators related to birthing pool use from organisational and multi-professional perspectives: a mixed-methods systematic review.
Cooper, Megan; Madeley, Anna-Marie; Burns, Ethel; Feeley, Claire.
Afiliación
  • Cooper M; Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
  • Madeley AM; Open University, Milton Keynes, England.
  • Burns E; Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, England.
  • Feeley C; King's College London, London, England. claire.feeley@kcl.ac.uk.
Reprod Health ; 20(1): 147, 2023 Oct 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37794365
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

To identify and synthesize the evidence regarding the facilitators and barriers relating to birthing pool use from organizational and multi-professional perspectives.

DESIGN:

A systematic integrated mixed methods review was conducted. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, EMCARE, PROQUEST and Web of Science databases were searched in April 2021, March 2022 and April 2024. We cross-referenced with Google Scholar and undertook reference list searches. REVIEW

METHODS:

Data were extracted from studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Barriers and facilitators to birthing pool use were mapped and integrated into descriptive statements further synthesized to develop overarching themes.

RESULTS:

Thirty seven articles (29 studies) were included-quantitative (12), qualitative (8), mixed methods (7), and audits (2), from 12 countries. These included the views of 9,082 multi-professionals (midwives, nurses, obstetricians, neonatologists, students, physicians, maternity support workers, doulas and childbirth educators). Additionally, 285 institutional policies or guidelines were included over 9 papers and 1 economic evaluation. Five themes were generated The paradox of prescriptiveness, The experienced but elusive practitioner, Advocacy and tensions, Trust or Trepidation and It's your choice, but only if it is a choice. These revealed when personal, contextual, and infrastructural factors were aligned and directed towards the support of birth pool use, birthing pool use was a genuine option. Conversely, the more barriers that women and midwives experienced, the less likely it was a viable option, reducing choice and access to safe analgesia.

CONCLUSION:

The findings demonstrated a paradoxical reality of water immersion with each of the five themes detailing how the "swing" within these factors directly affected whether birthing pool use was facilitated or inhibited.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Médicos / Partería Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Reprod Health Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Médicos / Partería Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Reprod Health Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia