Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Physician perspective on the implementation of risk mitigation strategies when prescribing opioid medications: a qualitative analysis.
Tata, Vaishnavi; Al Saadi, Randa; Cho, Sang Kyu; Varisco, Tyler J; Wanat, Matthew; Thornton, J Douglas.
Afiliación
  • Tata V; Department of Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, University of Houston College of Pharmacy, 4349 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd, Houston, TX, 77204, USA. vtata@central.uh.edu.
  • Al Saadi R; Prescription Drug Misuse and Education Research (PREMIER) Center, University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, TX, 77204, USA. vtata@central.uh.edu.
  • Cho SK; Department of Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, University of Houston College of Pharmacy, 4349 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd, Houston, TX, 77204, USA. rhalsaad@central.uh.edu.
  • Varisco TJ; Prescription Drug Misuse and Education Research (PREMIER) Center, University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, TX, 77204, USA. rhalsaad@central.uh.edu.
  • Wanat M; Department of Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, University of Houston College of Pharmacy, 4349 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd, Houston, TX, 77204, USA.
  • Thornton JD; Prescription Drug Misuse and Education Research (PREMIER) Center, University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, TX, 77204, USA.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 23(1): 1185, 2023 Oct 31.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37907915
OBJECTIVE: To understand the physician perspective on the barriers and facilitators of implementing nine different opioid risk mitigation strategies (RMS) when prescribing opioid medications. METHODS: We created and dispersed a cross-sectional online survey through the Qualtrics© data collection platform among a nationwide sample of physicians licensed to practice medicine in the United States who have prescribed an opioid medication within the past year. The responses were analyzed using a deductive thematic analysis approach based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to ensure a holistic approach to identifying the barriers and facilitators for each RMS assessed. In concordance with this method, the themes and codes for the thematic analysis were defined prior to the analysis. The five domains within the CFIR were used as themes and the 39 nested constructs were treated as the codes. Two members of the research team independently coded the transcripts and discussed points of disagreement until consensus was reached. All analyses were conducted in ATLAS.ti© V7. RESULTS: The completion rate for this survey was 85.1% with 273 participant responses eligible for analysis. Intercoder reliability was calculated to be 82%. Deductive thematic analysis yielded 2,077 descriptions of factors affecting implementation of the nine RMS. The most salient code across all RMS was Knowledge and Beliefs about the Intervention, which refers to individuals' attitudes towards and value placed on the intervention. Patient Needs and Resources, a code referring to the extent to which patient needs are known and prioritized by the organization, also emerged as a salient code. The physicians agreed that the patient perspective on the issue is vital to the uptake of each of the RMS. CONCLUSIONS: This deductive thematic analysis identified key points for actionable intervention across the nine RMS assessed and established the importance of patient concordance with physicians when deciding on a course of treatment.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Médicos / Analgésicos Opioides País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: BMC Health Serv Res Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Médicos / Analgésicos Opioides País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: BMC Health Serv Res Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos