Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy of mentalization-based therapy in treating self-harm: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hajek Gross, Carola; Oehlke, Sofia-Marie; Prillinger, Karin; Goreis, Andreas; Plener, Paul L; Kothgassner, Oswald D.
Afiliación
  • Hajek Gross C; Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Oehlke SM; Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Prillinger K; Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Goreis A; Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Plener PL; Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Kothgassner OD; Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Suicide Life Threat Behav ; 54(2): 317-337, 2024 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38279664
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Mentalization-based therapy (MBT) and its adapted version for adolescents (MBT-A) are repeatedly highlighted as promising treatments for reducing self-harm, particularly in borderline personality disorder (BPD). Despite the availability of publications providing evidence of their efficacy in reducing self-harm, recent meta-analyses have yielded mixed results. To inform best-practice clinical decision-making, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. We aimed to disentangle findings for both adolescents and adults on the efficacy of MBT(-A) in reducing self-harm (primary outcome) and symptoms of BPD and depression (secondary outcomes).

METHODS:

Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, PubMed/Medline, and Cochrane Review Database were searched for eligible studies published until September 2022. In total, 14 studies were identified, comprising 612 participants from nine MBT studies (six pre-post, three RCTs) and five MBT-A studies (two pre-post, three RCTs). Aggregated effect sizes were estimated using random-effects models. Meta-regressions were conducted to assess the effect of moderator variables (treatment duration, drop-out rates, and age) on effect sizes.

RESULTS:

Overall, both MBT and MBT-A demonstrated promising effects in reducing self-harm (g = -0.82, 95% CI -1.15 to -0.50), borderline personality disorder (g = -1.08, 95% CI -1.38 to -0.77), and depression (g = -1.1, 95% CI -1.52 to -0.68) symptoms. However, when compared to control interventions (TAU, SCM), MBT(-A) did not prove to be more efficacious, with the exception of MBT showing superior effects on BPD symptoms in adults (g = -0.56, 95% CI -0.88 to -0.24).

CONCLUSION:

Although the pre-post evaluations seem promising, this analysis, including RCTs, showed no superiority of MBT(-A) to control conditions, so that prioritizing the application of MBT (-A) for the treatment of self-harm is not supported. Possible explanations and further implications are discussed.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI: Terapias_mente_y_cuerpo / Meditacion Asunto principal: Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe / Conducta Autodestructiva / Mentalización Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Suicide Life Threat Behav Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Austria

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI: Terapias_mente_y_cuerpo / Meditacion Asunto principal: Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe / Conducta Autodestructiva / Mentalización Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Suicide Life Threat Behav Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Austria