Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Herbal Medicines for the Treatment of Active Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Iyengar, Preetha; Godoy-Brewer, Gala; Maniyar, Isha; White, Jacob; Maas, Laura; Parian, Alyssa M; Limketkai, Berkeley.
Afiliación
  • Iyengar P; Department of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
  • Godoy-Brewer G; Department of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
  • Maniyar I; Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
  • White J; Welch Library, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
  • Maas L; Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
  • Parian AM; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
  • Limketkai B; Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Nutrients ; 16(7)2024 Mar 23.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38612967
ABSTRACT
Herbal medicines are used by patients with IBD despite limited evidence. We present a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating treatment with herbal medicines in active ulcerative colitis (UC). A search query designed by a library informationist was used to identify potential articles for inclusion. Articles were screened and data were extracted by at least two investigators. Outcomes of interest included clinical response, clinical remission, endoscopic response, endoscopic remission, and safety. We identified 28 RCTs for 18 herbs. In pooled analyses, when compared with placebo, clinical response rates were significantly higher for Indigo naturalis (IN) (RR 3.70, 95% CI 1.97-6.95), but not for Curcuma longa (CL) (RR 1.60, 95% CI 0.99-2.58) or Andrographis paniculata (AP) (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.71-1.26). There was a significantly higher rate of clinical remission for CL (RR 2.58, 95% CI 1.18-5.63), but not for AP (RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.86-2.01). Higher rates of endoscopic response (RR 1.56, 95% CI 1.08-2.26) and remission (RR 19.37, 95% CI 2.71-138.42) were significant for CL. CL has evidence supporting its use as an adjuvant therapy in active UC. Research with larger scale and well-designed RCTs, manufacturing regulations, and education are needed.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Colitis Ulcerosa / Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto / Fitoterapia Idioma: En Revista: Nutrients Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Colitis Ulcerosa / Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto / Fitoterapia Idioma: En Revista: Nutrients Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos