Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Biologic therapies in stress fractures: Current concepts.
Jacob, George; Shimomura, Kazunori; Nakamura, Norimasa.
Afiliación
  • Jacob G; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lakeshore Hospital, Cochin, India.
  • Shimomura K; Department of Rehabilitation, Kansai University of Welfare Sciences, Osaka, Japan; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
  • Nakamura N; Institute for Medical Science in Sports, Osaka Health Science University, Osaka, Japan; Global Centre for Medical Engineering and Informatics, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan. Electronic address: norimasa.nakamura@ohsu.ac.jp.
J ISAKOS ; 2024 Apr 15.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38631518
ABSTRACT
Stress fractures, a common overuse injury in physically active individuals, present a significant challenge for athletes and military personnel. Patients who sustain stress fractures have demanding training regimes where periods of rest and immobilisation have unacceptable negative consequences on sports goals and finances. Aside from being an overuse injury, there are various contributing risk factors that put certain individuals at risk of a stress fracture. The main two being nutritional deficiencies and hormonal variations, which have significant effects on bone metabolism and turnover. Historically, treatment of stress fractures focused on conservative strategies such as rest and immobilisation. Calcium and vitamin D deficiencies have been closely linked to stress fractures and so over time supplementation has also played a role in treatment. With the introduction of biologics into orthopaedics, newer treatment strategies have been applied to accelerate fracture healing and perhaps improve fracture callus quality. If such therapies can reduce time spent away from sport and activity, it would be ideal for treating stress fractures. This article aims to offer insights into the evolving landscape of stress fracture management. It investigates the pre-clinical evidence and available published clinical applications. Though fracture healing is well understood, the role of biologics for fracture healing is still indeterminate. Available literature for the use of biologic therapies in stress fractures are restricted and most reports have used biologics as a supplement to surgical fixation in subjects in studies that lack control groups. Randomised control trials have been proposed and registered by a few groups, with results awaited. Assessing individuals for risk factors, addressing hormonal imbalances and nutritional deficiencies seems like an effective approach to addressing the burden of stress fractures. We await better designed trials and studies to accurately determine the clinical benefit of adding biologics to the management of these injuries.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J ISAKOS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: India

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J ISAKOS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: India