Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical and ex-vivo effect of LASERs on prevention of early-enamel caries: systematic review & meta-analyses.
Abd El-Aal, Nermin H; Hussein, Ahmad Mostafa Hussein Mohamad Mostafa; Banerjee, Avijit; Hammama, Hamdi Hosney.
Afiliación
  • Abd El-Aal NH; Mansoura University, Operative Dentistry Department, Mansoura, Egypt. nermin_hafez@mans.edu.eg.
  • Hussein AMHMM; Mansoura University, Biomaterials Department, Mansoura, Egypt.
  • Banerjee A; Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
  • Hammama HH; Mansoura University, Operative Dentistry Department, Mansoura, Egypt.
Lasers Med Sci ; 39(1): 107, 2024 Apr 18.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38635085
ABSTRACT
To investigate the in vivo and in situ effect of different types of lasers in prevention of enamel demineralization in high caries risk cases (around orthodontic brackets, around restoration and in caries susceptible pits and fissures). PubMed was searched using the following keyword sequence; (Laser therapy OR laser irradiation OR laser application) AND (enamel caries prevention OR enamel demineralization OR enamel remineralization OR early enamel caries OR early-enamel caries OR enamel resistance OR enamel decalcification OR white spot lesions WSLs OR incipient lesion OR enamel decay OR enamel Dissolution OR enamel microhardness) AND (clinical trial OR Randomized clinical trial OR In situ study). The latest literature search was ended by "30 January 2023". PubMed was used as a primary data base for study selection. Scopus, EBSCO, and Google scholar are checked in our study after results of systematic search on PubMed. Only duplicates were found. Two meta-analyses were carried out. The first, clinical meta-analysis on incidence of white spot lesions (WSLs) following CO2 laser irradiation of enamel. The second meta-analysis on ex-vivo/in situ effect of CO2 laser on microhardness of enamel. In each meta-analysis three studies were included. Risk of bias was assessed. The search identified eight studies (four ex-vivo and four clinical trials). Regarding the clinical meta-analysis, the overall standardized mean difference was 0.21 [ 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15-0.30, p < 0.00001]. This indicates that the incidence of new WSLs in patients who received low power CO2 laser treatment was highly significantly lower than placebo groups. The heterogeneity was considerable (I2 = 71%). In the second meta-analysis, the overall standardized mean difference was 49.55 [ 95% confidence interval (CI) 37.74, 61.37, p < 0.00001]. This indicates that microhardness of enamel receiving low power (0.4-5 W) CO2 laser irradiation is highly significantly lower than control untreated enamel. The heterogeneity was substantial (I2 = 48%). Within the limitations of this study, Low level laser therapy concept with CO2 laser seems to be effective in preventing enamel caries.Prospero registration number CRD42023437379.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Caries Dental / Esmalte Dental Idioma: En Revista: Lasers Med Sci Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Egipto

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Caries Dental / Esmalte Dental Idioma: En Revista: Lasers Med Sci Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Egipto