Motor activity of refashioned colorectoanus in patients with total colonic aganglionosis.

An ano-recto-sigmoid colon pressure study was designed to evaluate the characteristics of the motor activity of refashioned colorectoanus in patients with total colonic aganglionosis (TCA) in comparison to patients with rectosigmoid Hirschsprung's disease (HD) and healthy children (HC), and to elucidate the pathophysiology of the pulled-through ileum, with aganglionic colon as an onlay patch, in coordination with the anal sphincter. The study group consisted of six patients with TCA, six with HD who underwent endorectal colonic pull-through, and six HC. Pressure studies were performed using a triple-lumen catheter; recording sites were 15 and 9 cm from the anal verge, and at the anal canal. The following were measured and compared: (1) anal canal pressure profile, (2) resting pattern of activity at the refashioned colorectum and anal canal, and (3) changes in motor activity after stimulation with cold water and glycerin. The motor activities of the refashioned colorectoanus of TCA and HD patients differed greatly from those of HC. All six HC had no isolated high-amplitude contraction (IHAC) in the colorectum during the 45-minute study period; they complained of a strong urge to defecate after glycerin enema and actually did so. In contrast, IHAC appeared 2.0 +/- 1.3 times per 10 minutes, with maximal amplitude of 60.3 +/- 24.9 cm H2O in TCA, and 5.6 +/- 3.7 per 10 minutes with maximal amplitude of 79.5 +/- 11.7 cm H2O in HD. After glycerin enema, IHAC increased to 0.5 +/- 0.2 per minute and 69.3 +/- 44.6 cm H2O in TCA and to 0.8 +/- 0.4 per minute and 93.0 +/- 12.8 cm H2O in HD. Defecation was postponed for more than 10 minutes in two HD and all TCA patients. The mean motility index per minute was least for TCA patients (76.9 +/- 98.2); it was 406.5 +/- 197.1 (P < .05) for HD patients and 159.2 +/- 84.2 (P < .01) for HC. TCA patients had the lowest amplitude of maximal resting anal pressure, and hypoactivity of the colorectum during rest and after stimulation; this suggests that motor dysfunction involves even the ganglionic ileum, concomitant with suppressed signals to the higher integrating center for defecation.