Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The effects of scapular mobilization in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
Aytar, Aydan; Baltaci, Gul; Uhl, Tim L; Tuzun, Handan; Oztop, Pinar; Karatas, Metin.
Afiliação
  • Aytar A; Dept of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Baskent University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
J Sport Rehabil ; 24(2): 116-29, 2015 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25054347
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of scapular mobilization on function, pain, range of motion, and satisfaction in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome (SAIS). DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. SETTING: University hospital clinics in Turkey. PARTICIPANTS: 66 participants (mean ± SD age 52.06 ± 3.71 y) with SAIS. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized into 3 groups: scapular mobilization, sham scapular mobilization, and supervised exercise. Before the interventions transcutaneous electrical stimulation and hot pack were applied to all groups. Total intervention duration for all groups was 3 wk with a total of 9 treatment sessions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Shoulder function and pain intensity were primary outcome measures; range of motion and participant satisfaction were secondary outcome measures. Shoulder function was assessed with the short form of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (DASH). A visual analog scale was used to evaluate pain severity. Active range of motion was measured with a universal goniometer. A 7-point Likert scale was used to evaluate satisfaction. Outcome measurements were performed at baseline, before visits 5 and 10, 4 wk after visit 9, and 8 wk after visit 9. RESULTS: There was no group difference for DASH score (P = .75), pain at rest (P = .41), pain with activity (P = .45), pain at night (P = .74), and shoulder flexion (P = .65), external rotation (P = .63), and internal rotation (P = .19). There was a significant increase in shoulder motion and function and a significant decrease in pain across time when all groups were combined (P < .001). The level of satisfaction was not significantly different for any of the questions about participant satisfaction between all groups (P > .05). CONCLUSION: There was not a significant advantage of scapular mobilization for shoulder function, pain, range of motion, and satisfaction compared with sham or supervised-exercise groups in patients with SAIS.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Métodos Terapêuticos e Terapias MTCI: Terapias_manuales / Masoterapia Assunto principal: Escápula / Síndrome de Colisão do Ombro / Manipulações Musculoesqueléticas Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: J Sport Rehabil Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Turquia

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Métodos Terapêuticos e Terapias MTCI: Terapias_manuales / Masoterapia Assunto principal: Escápula / Síndrome de Colisão do Ombro / Manipulações Musculoesqueléticas Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: J Sport Rehabil Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Turquia