Predicting Manual Therapy Treatment Success in Patients With Chronic Ankle Instability: Improving Self-Reported Function.
J Athl Train
; 52(4): 325-331, 2017 Apr.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-28290704
CONTEXT: Therapeutic modalities that stimulate sensory receptors around the foot-ankle complex improve chronic ankle instability (CAI)-associated impairments. However, not all patients have equal responses to these modalities. Identifying predictors of treatment success could improve clinician efficiency when treating patients with CAI. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a response analysis on existing data to identify predictors of improved self-reported function in patients with CAI. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Sports medicine research laboratories. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-nine patients with CAI, which was defined in accordance with the International Ankle Consortium recommendations. INTERVENTION(S): Participants were randomized into 3 treatment groups (plantar massage [PM], ankle-joint mobilization [AJM], or calf stretching [CS]) that received six 5-minute treatments over 2 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Treatment success, defined as a patient exceeding the minimally clinically important difference of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure-Sport (FAAM-S). RESULTS: Patients with ≤5 recurrent sprains and ≤82.73% on the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure had a 98% probability of having a meaningful FAAM-S improvement after AJM. As well, ≥5 balance errors demonstrated 98% probability of meaningful FAAM-S improvements from AJM. Patients <22 years old and with ≤9.9 cm of dorsiflexion had a 99% probability of a meaningful FAAM-S improvement after PM. Also, those who made ≥2 single-limb-stance errors had a 98% probability of a meaningful FAAM-S improvement from PM. Patients with ≤53.1% on the FAAM-S had an 83% probability of a meaningful FAAM-S improvement after CS. CONCLUSIONS: Each sensory-targeted ankle-rehabilitation strategy resulted in a unique combination of predictors of success for patients with CAI. Specific indicators of success with AJM were deficits in self-reported function, single-limb balance, and <5 previous sprains. Age, weight-bearing-dorsiflexion restrictions, and single-limb balance deficits identified patients with CAI who will respond well to PM. Assessing self-reported sport-related function can identify CAI patients who will respond positively to CS.
Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Métodos Terapêuticos e Terapias MTCI:
Terapias_manuales
/
Masoterapia
Assunto principal:
Traumatismos do Tornozelo
/
Manipulações Musculoesqueléticas
/
Instabilidade Articular
Tipo de estudo:
Clinical_trials
/
Guideline
/
Prognostic_studies
/
Risk_factors_studies
Idioma:
En
Revista:
J Athl Train
Ano de publicação:
2017
Tipo de documento:
Article