Contemporary use of intra-aortic balloon pumps during percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking program.

BACKGROUND: Intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABP) support nonemergent and emergent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Recent studies have not showed a routine benefit to this practice. We sought to evaluate the temporal trends in balloon pump utilization and site-level variation within a large integrated healthcare system. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified all patients that underwent PCI in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2015. Procedural information was ascertained from the medical record and stratified by the concomitant use of an IABP. Site-specific variation was determined with mixed logistic regression models and reported as a median odds ratio. RESULTS: There were 88 851 interventions performed on 71 529 patients across 71 hospitals with 1289 (1.5%) of these utilizing an IABP. Patients that underwent an intervention with this device had more medical comorbidities, as reflected by an increase in the median National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI mortality score (34 vs. 15, P<0.001). The overall utilization of balloon pumps was constant throughout the study period (P=0.446). However, there was a significant decline (P=0.027) in its use during emergent cases with a significant increase (P=0.009) during nonemergent cases. Furthermore, there was site variation in use independent of patient or procedural characteristics (median odds ratio: 1.82, 95% confidence interval: 1.58-2.16). CONCLUSION: In the largest integrated healthcare system in the USA, there was a significant decline in IABP use among emergent cases and a significant increase during nonemergent cases. Residual site variation suggests an opportunity to standardize a procedural approach consistent with currently available data.