Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The use of cisplatin plus doxorubicin or paclitaxel in hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for stage IIIC or IV epithelial ovarian cancer: a comparative study.
Manzanedo, I; Pereira, F; Serrano, Á; Pérez-Viejo, E; Martínez-Torres, B; Carrión, L; Calzas, J.
Afiliação
  • Manzanedo I; Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Fuenlabrada, C/ Camino del Molino 2, 28942, Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain. israel.manzanedo@salud.madrid.org.
  • Pereira F; Rey Juan Carlos University (URJC), Madrid, Spain. israel.manzanedo@salud.madrid.org.
  • Serrano Á; Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Fuenlabrada, C/ Camino del Molino 2, 28942, Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain.
  • Pérez-Viejo E; Rey Juan Carlos University (URJC), Madrid, Spain.
  • Martínez-Torres B; Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Fuenlabrada, C/ Camino del Molino 2, 28942, Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain.
  • Carrión L; Rey Juan Carlos University (URJC), Madrid, Spain.
  • Calzas J; Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Fuenlabrada, C/ Camino del Molino 2, 28942, Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 21(10): 1357-1363, 2019 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30788835
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Our main aim is to analyze the survival results in women operated on for advanced ovarian cancer with two different HIPEC regimens (cisplatin plus doxorubicin versus paclitaxel). PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

A prospective cohort of patients with stage IIIC or IV epithelial ovarian cancer operated on with cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC, from October-2008 to February-2016, was retrospectively analyzed. The two drugs used, cisplatin/doxorubicin (Group A) and paclitaxel (Group B), were compared.

RESULTS:

Forty-one patients were treated with cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC; 19 patients (46%) were in Group A and 22 (54%) were in Group B. The extent of peritoneal disease was comparable between groups (Peritoneal Cancer Index of 10 in Group A versus PCI of 12.5 in Group B). There were no differences in morbidity between groups, with a severe morbidity (Dindo-Clavien III or IV) of 36.8% versus 27.3%, respectively. There was no postoperative mortality. Median follow-up was 39 months. Median overall survival was 79 months. Overall survival at 3 years in Group A was 66% versus 82.9% in Group B (p = 0.248). Incomplete cytoreduction (macroscopic residual tumour after surgery) was identified as the only independent factor that influenced overall survival (HR 12.30, 95% CI 1.28-118.33, p = 0.03). The cytostatic used in HIPEC had no influence in overall survival.

CONCLUSION:

The cytostatic used in HIPEC did not have a negative effect in the prognosis of patients with advanced ovarian cancer.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Ovarianas / Neoplasias Peritoneais / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário / Hipertermia Induzida Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Clin Transl Oncol Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Espanha

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Ovarianas / Neoplasias Peritoneais / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário / Hipertermia Induzida Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Clin Transl Oncol Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Espanha