Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is there a risk to honeybees from use of thiamethoxam as a sugar beet seed treatment?
Thompson, Helen; Vaughan, Sarah; Mahlein, Anne-Katrin; Ladewig, Erwin; Kenter, Christine.
Afiliação
  • Thompson H; Syngenta, Jealott's Hill International Research Station, Berkshire, UK.
  • Vaughan S; Syngenta, Jealott's Hill International Research Station, Berkshire, UK.
  • Mahlein AK; Institute of Sugar Beet Research, Göttingen, Germany.
  • Ladewig E; Institute of Sugar Beet Research, Göttingen, Germany.
  • Kenter C; Institute of Sugar Beet Research, Göttingen, Germany.
Integr Environ Assess Manag ; 18(3): 709-721, 2022 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34292667
ABSTRACT
The ban imposed by the European Union on the use of neonicotinoids as sugar beet seed treatments was based on the exposure of bees to residues of neonicotinoids in pollen and nectar of succeeding crops. To address this concern, residues of thiamethoxam (TMX) and clothianidin (CTD) were analyzed in soil collected from fields planted in at least the previous year with thiamethoxam-treated sugar beet seed. This soil monitoring program was conducted at 94 sites across Germany in two separate years. In addition, a succeeding crop study assessed residues in soil, guttation fluid, pollen, and nectar sampled from untreated succeeding crops planted in the season after thiamethoxam seed-treated sugar beet at eight field sites across five countries. The overall mean residues observed in soil monitoring were 8.0 ± 0.5 µg TMX + CTD/kg in the season after the use of treated sugar beet seed. Residue values decreased with increasing time interval between the latest thiamethoxam or clothianidin application before sugar beet drilling and with lower application frequency. Residues were detected in guttation fluid (2.0-37.7 µg TMX/L); however, the risk to pollinators from this route of exposure is likely to be low, based on the reported levels of consumption. Residues of thiamethoxam and clothianidin in pollen and nectar sampled from the succeeding crops were detected at or below the limit of quantification (0.5-1 µg a.i./kg) in 86.7% of pollen and 98.6% of nectar samples and, unlike guttation fluid residues, were not correlated with measured soil residues. Residues in pollen and nectar are lower than reported sublethal adverse effect concentrations in studies with honeybee and bumble bee individuals and colonies fed only thiamethoxam-treated sucrose, and are lower than those reported to result in no effects in honeybees, bumble bees, and solitary bees foraging on seed-treated crops. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2022;18709-721. © 2021 SYNGENTA. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Métodos Terapêuticos e Terapias MTCI: Terapias_biologicas / Peloideterapia Assunto principal: Beta vulgaris / Inseticidas Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Integr Environ Assess Manag Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Métodos Terapêuticos e Terapias MTCI: Terapias_biologicas / Peloideterapia Assunto principal: Beta vulgaris / Inseticidas Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Integr Environ Assess Manag Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido