Evolution of Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Starting Macitentan After the Discontinuation of Other Endothelin-Receptor Antagonists: Results of a Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Macitentan is the latest endothelin-receptor antagonist (ERA) approved for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), presenting enhanced properties over previous ERAs. OBJECTIVE: We describe the clinical and echocardiographic evolution of patients with PAH who started macitentan after discontinuing bosentan/ambrisentan. METHODS: This was a retrospective series of patients with different etiologies who started macitentan after the suspension of other ERAs under routine clinical practice at five Spanish hospitals. World Health Organization functional class (WHO-FC), 6-min walk distance (6MWD), levels of N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and cardiac imaging data were collected and described at baseline (before macitentan initiation) and after 3, 6, and 12 months, when available. RESULTS: In total, 12 patients (ten women; mean age 65.63 ± 13.27 years) were observed. At baseline, most patients were receiving concomitant PAH medications, and five patients were classed as WHO-FC III. After 3 months of macitentan treatment, WHO-FC had improved in four patients, 6MWD increased in eight patients, and NT-proBNP levels and right atrial area were lowered in seven and eight patients, respectively. Similar results were observed after 6 and 12 months. Macitentan was well-tolerated, with no PAH hospitalizations, septostomies, transplants, or deaths registered. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that switching to macitentan in patients with PAH who discontinued bosentan/ambrisentan was well-tolerated and effective. Further studies are needed to confirm these observations.

Real-life experience of inhaled iloprost for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: Insights from the Spanish REHAP registry.

INTRODUCTION: REHAP is a voluntary, observational Spanish registry of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. We analyzed the experience (use and effectiveness) with inhaled iloprost (inh-ILO) in real-life conditions during a 3-year period. METHODS: Patients included were those with PAH ≥14 years recruited during 1998-2016 who had received inh-ILO. Variables were collected at the beginning of treatment (0 ±â€¯3 months) and 12 ±â€¯3/36 ±â€¯6 months follow-up. Effectiveness was assessed in the intent-to-treat population as changes in functional class and/or physical performance and transplant-free survival from the beginning of treatment. Stopping inh-ILO-related survival was also assessed. Subanalyses included treatment strategy (first-line therapy -monotherapy or upfront combination- or sequential therapy) and risk of clinical worsening/death. RESULTS: Inh-ILO was the most frequently used prostanoid in Spain, rendering 267 patients eligible for analysis. Median age was 54 years; 61% were WHO FC III. Sixty (23%) patients started inh-ILO as monotherapy, 27 (10%) as upfront combination and 180 (67%) sequentially. At 3-year follow-up significant clinical improvements were observed; however, transplant-free survival rate was 54%, being poorer in patients at high risk (63% vs. 85% in low risk patients; P < 0.001) and similar in the three treatment strategies. Only 25% patients remained on inh-ILO. Three-year after stopping inh-ILO-related survival rate was 24.7%. CONCLUSION: Data from the REHAP collected during 3 years shows that inh-ILO has low effectiveness independently of the treatment strategy used, with a 3-year survival rate of 54% despite significant clinical improvements, probably due to the use in high-risk patients. Discontinuation rate was as high as 75%.