Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence in Patients With Transient New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation Detected During Hospitalization for Noncardiac Surgery or Medical Illness : A Matched Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is often detected for the first time in patients who are hospitalized for another reason. Long-term risks for AF recurrence in these patients are unclear. OBJECTIVE: To estimate risk for AF recurrence in patients with new-onset AF during a hospitalization for noncardiac surgery or medical illness compared with a matched population without AF. DESIGN: Matched cohort study. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03221777). SETTING: Three academic hospitals in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: The study enrolled patients hospitalized for noncardiac surgery or medical illness who had transient new-onset AF. For each participant, an age- and sex-matched control participant with no history of AF from the same hospital ward was recruited. All participants left the hospital in sinus rhythm. MEASUREMENTS: 14-day electrocardiographic (ECG) monitor at 1 and 6 months and telephone assessment at 1, 6, and 12 months. The primary outcome was AF lasting at least 30 seconds on the monitor or captured by ECG 12-lead during routine care at 12 months. RESULTS: Among 139 participants with transient new-onset AF (70 patients with medical illness and 69 surgical patients) and 139 matched control participants, the mean age was 71 years (SD, 10), the mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.0 (SD, 1.5), and 59% were male. The median duration of AF during the index hospitalization was 15.8 hours (IQR, 6.4 to 49.6 hours). After 1 year, recurrent AF was detected in 33.1% (95% CI, 25.3% to 40.9%) of participants in the transient new-onset AF group and 5.0% (CI, 1.4% to 8.7%) of matched control participants; after adjustment for the number of ECG monitors worn and for baseline clinical differences, the adjusted relative risk was 6.6 (CI, 3.2 to 13.7). After exclusion of participants who had electrical or pharmacologic cardioversion during the index hospitalization (n = 40) and their matched control participants and limiting to AF events detected by the patch ECG monitor, recurrent AF was detected in 32.3% (CI, 23.1% to 41.5%) of participants with transient new-onset AF and 3.0% (CI, 0% to 6.4%) of matched control participants. LIMITATIONS: Generalizability is limited, and the study was underpowered to evaluate subgroups and clinical predictors. CONCLUSION: Among patients who have transient new-onset AF during a hospitalization for noncardiac surgery or medical illness, approximately 1 in 3 will have recurrent AF within 1 year. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Peer-reviewed grants.

Outcomes and Safety of Fluoroless Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Intracardiac echocardiography and 3D mapping systems allow catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) to be conducted without fluoroscopy; however, the safety and effectiveness of fluoroless AF ablation are not well defined. METHODS: We examined consecutive radiofrequency AF catheter ablations at a large academic teaching hospital from November 2017 to July 2019. Outcomes for fluoroscopy-guided (N = 176) and fluoroless (N = 147) ablations were compared. Cases were designated as fluoroless at the outset of the procedure. RESULTS: Mean age was 59.5 ± 10 years, 66.9% were male, 71.8% had paroxysmal AF, and the mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 1.7 ± 1.4. There were no differences in patient baseline characteristics. In the fluoroless group, minimal fluoroscopy was used in 17 patients (median, 3 seconds; interquartile range, 1.2-4.8). Mean procedure time, fluoroscopy time, and radiation dose (± standard deviation) were greater in the fluoroscopy group compared with the fluoroless group (194 ± 56 vs 176 ± 46 minutes, P = 0.0021; 10.7 ± 6.6 vs 0.008 ± 0.03 minutes, P < 0.0001; 2759.2 ± 1911 vs 5.4 ± 24 µGy m2, P < 0.0001). In multivariable linear regression models, fluoroless AF ablation was independently associated with reduced procedure times (ß = -16.5 minutes, P = 0.01). Acute procedural success (95.5% vs 98.6%, P = 0.1), complication rates (4.5% vs 2.0%, P = 0.24), and 1-year AF recurrence rates (28.7% vs 27.1%, log-rank P = 0.69) were similar between fluoroscopy and fluoroless groups. Excluding the 17 patients receiving fluoroscopy in the fluoroless group did not impact our results (P = 0.013). After exclusion of redo cases, fluoroless AF ablation was no longer associated with reduced procedure times (ß = -11.4 minutes, P = 0.106). CONCLUSIONS: Fluoroless radiofrequency AF ablation had similar effectiveness and safety compared with conventional fluoroscopy-guided AF ablation.

CONTEXTE: L'échocardiographie intracardiaque et les systèmes de cartographie 3D permettent l'ablation par cathéter de la fibrillation auriculaire (FA) sans fluoroscopie; l'innocuité et l'efficacité d'une telle approche ne sont toutefois pas bien connues. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Nous avons examiné les résultats d'ablations par cathéter de la FA par radiofréquences menées de façon consécutive dans un hôpital universitaire d'envergure entre novembre 2017 et juillet 2019. Les résultats des ablations par fluoroscopie (n = 176) et des ablations sans fluoroscopie (n = 147) ont été comparés. Les cas étaient désignés comme n'ayant pas utilisé la fluoroscopie à la fin de l'intervention, le cas échéant. RÉSULTATS: L'âge moyen était de 59,5 ± 10 ans, 66,9 % des patients étaient des hommes, 71,8 % étaient atteints de FA paroxystique, et le score CHA2DS2-VASc moyen était de 1,7 ± 1,4. Il n'y avait pas de différences entre les caractéristiques des patients au départ. Dans le groupe ayant subi une ablation sans fluoroscopie, une fluoroscopie minimale a été utilisée chez 17 patients (médiane : 3 secondes; intervalle interquartile : 1,2-4,8). La durée moyenne de l'intervention, la durée de la fluoroscopie, et la dose de rayonnements (± écart type) ont été plus élevées dans le groupe avec fluoroscopie que dans le groupe sans fluoroscopie (194 ± 56 vs 176 ± 46 minutes, p = 0,0021; 10,7 ± 6,6 vs 0,008 ± 0,03 minute, p < 0,0001; 2759,2 ± 1911 vs 5,4 ± 24 µGy m2, p < 0,0001). Dans des modèles de régression linéaire multivariables, l'ablation de la FA sans fluoroscopie a été associée de façon indépendante à des interventions de plus courte durée (ß = −16,5 minutes, p = 0,01). Le succès immédiat de l'intervention (95,5 % vs 98,6 %, p = 0,1), le taux de complications (4,5 % vs 2,0 %, p = 0,24), et le taux de récidive de la FA après 1 an (28,7 % vs 27,1 %, p (test du log-rank = 0,69) ont été comparables dans les groupes avec et sans fluoroscopie. L'exclusion des 17 patients chez qui la fluoroscopie avait été utilisée dans le groupe sans fluoroscopie n'a pas modifié ces résultats (p = 0,013). Après l'exclusion des cas où l'intervention était une reprise, l'ablation de la FA sans fluoroscopie n'était plus associée à une réduction des durées d'intervention (ß = −11,4 minutes, p = 0,106). CONCLUSIONS: L'ablation de la FA par radiofréquences sans fluoroscopie est associée à une efficacité et à une innocuité comparables à celles de l'ablation de la FA classique guidée par fluoroscopie.