How can lean thinking improve ERAS program in bariatric surgery?

INTRODUCTION: Enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery protocol (ERABS) decreased length of hospital stay (LOS) without influencing clinical outcomes. ERABS improved logistics aspects in operating room (OR) with OR time savings. Lean management was used to reorganize OR logistics and to improve its efficiency. This study analyzed clinical and OR logistic aspects in ERABS protocols. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained database of obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery from 2017 to 2019 was performed. Since September 2018, patients were treated with ERABS protocol (ERABS group). All patients treated with a standard protocol between January 2017 and September 2018 (control group) were compared to ERABS group. Preoperative (anthropometric data, surgical and medical history) and intraoperative (type of procedure) were analyzed in two groups. LOS was the primary outcomes parameter analyzed; complications, readmissions and reoperations within 30 days were the secondary outcomes. Logistic endpoints were evaluated in time saving and efficiency: surgical time, team work time and total anesthesia time. RESULTS: 471 patients underwent bariatric surgery: 239 patients (control group) compared to 232 patients (ERABS group). ERABS presented more previous surgical history rate (p = 0.04) compared to control group with difference of type of procedure performed (p < 0.001). Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was mainly procedure in both groups (61.1% in control group compared to 52.6% in ERABS groups). Mean LOS was shorter in ERABS (3.16 days) compared to control group (4.81 days) with no difference in clinical outcomes rate. All logistics endpoints showed a time savings in ERABS group compared to control group (surgical procedure, total anesthesia and team work time, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, LOS was associated to ERAS status (IRR 0.722; p < 0.0001), team work time (IRR 1.002; p = 0.002), surgical procedure time (IRR 1.002; p < 0.0001). ERAS status was not associated with complication neither readmission, but surgical procedure time was a factor associated with complication (IRR 1.011; p = 0.0008). CONCLUSION: This study confirmed that ERABS protocol is safe and a feasible alternative with improved LOS. OR reorganization and logistic efficiency achieved using lean management helped reduce all OR times and these are likely related to the improvement in LOS and complication.

Hepatic artery reinforcement after post pancreatectomy haemorrhage caused by pancreatitis.

Post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) is a major complication occurring in 6-8% of patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Arterial bleeding is the most frequent cause. Mortality rate could reach 30% after grade C PPH according to ISGPS classification. Complete interruption of hepatic arterial flow has to be a salvage procedure because of the high risk of intrahepatic abscess following the procedure. We report a technique to perform an artery reinforcement after PPH caused by pancreatitis. A PD according to Whipple's procedure with child's reconstruction was performed in a 68-year-old man. At postoperative day 12, the patient presented a sudden violent abdominal pain with arterial hypotension and tachycardia. Computed tomography (CT) with intravenous contrast injection was performed. Arterial and venous phases showed a contrast extravasation on the hepatic artery. Origin of PPH was found as an erosion of hepatic artery caused by pancreatic leak. A peritoneal patch was placed around hepatic artery to reinforce damaged arterial wall. The peritoneal patch was harvested from right hypochondrium with a thin preperitoneal fat layer. The patch was sutured around hepatic artery with musculoaponeurotic face placed on the arterial wall. A CT was performed and hepatic artery was permeable with normal caliber in the portion of peritoneal patch reinforcement. The technique described in the present case consists in reinforcing directly arterial wall after occurrence of PPH. The use of a peritoneal patch during pancreatic surgery has first been described to replace a portion of portal vein after venous resection with the peritoneal layer placed on the intraluminal side of the vein. The present case describes a salvage technique to reinforce damaged artery after PPH in context of pancreatic leak. This simple technique could be useful to avoid complex arterial reconstruction and recurrent bleeding in septic context.