RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Dropped head syndrome (DHS) is followed by severe cervical extension muscle weakness that results in chin-on chest deformity. However, maintaining a neutral cervical position can be temporarily possible, and the diagnosis of DHS might sometimes be difficult. The purpose of the present study is to examine a novel clinical test (DHS test) as the diagnostic utility for objective evaluation that focuses on cervical extension condition in the prone position. METHODS: One hundred subjects were diagnosed with isolated neck extensor myopathy (INEM)-DHS at our hospital (17 men and 83 women, mean age 75.0 ± 8.5 years), and 62 subjects were enrolled as age-matched controls. The DHS test consisted of three examinations; the first was "Ceiling gazing test" in standing position, the second was horizontal gazing in "Sphinx prone position test", and the third was horizontal gazing in "Hands and knees prone position test". We investigated the sensitivity and specificity of the DHS test for DHS. RESULTS: The patients showing positive in the INEM-DHS group were 63/100 in Ceiling gaze test, 73/100 in the Sphinx prone position test, and 91/100 in the Hands and knees prone position test. In the control group, 0/62 patients presented positive in the Ceiling gaze test, 4/62 in the Sphinx prone position test, and 0/62 in the Hands and knees prone position test. Sensitivity and specificity of the DHS test were 63.0%/100%, 73.0%/93.5%, and 91.0%/100% in the Ceiling gaze test, Sphinx position prone position test, and Hands and knees prone position test, respectively. CONCLUSION: The prone position cervical extension test (DHS test) would be useful as a novel objective diagnostic tool for INEM-DHS.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with osteoporosis but no evidence of fracture can sometimes report low back pain. However, few studies have evaluated the nature of osteoporotic low back pain in a clinical situation. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the nature of osteoporotic low back pain without fracture, and the analgesic effect of minodronic acid hydrate on such pain. METHODS: The current study examined 136 patients with osteoporotic low back pain and no lower extremity symptoms. The following factors were evaluated before and after minodronic acid hydrate administration: the nature of osteoporotic low back pain was evaluated using the painDETECT questionnaire, numeric rating scale (NRS) score for low back pain at rest and in motion, bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine, and the serum concentration of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRACP-5b) as a bone metabolism marker. RESULTS: A total of 113 patients were enrolled. The painDETECT questionnaire revealed the percentage of patients with nociceptive pain and neuropathic or mixed pain was approximately 85% and 15%, respectively. the average NRS scores for low back pain at rest decreased significantly 2 months after treatment (p = 0.01), while those in motion decreased significantly 1 month after treatment (p = 0.04). The average lumbar spine BMD tended to increase after treatment, but not significantly. On the other hand, the changes in the average serum concentration of TRACP-5b did significantly decrease 1 month after treatment. There was a significant positive correlation between the rate of NRS score improvement for low back pain at rest, and the rate of improvement in serum concentration of TRACP-5b (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Osteoporotic low back pain consisted of 85% nociceptive pain and 15% neuropathic or mixed pain. The pain is strongly related to pain at rest rather than that in motion.