RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study explored the acceptability and feasibility of the use of low-cost virtual reality (VR) glasses, and the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Scale and Children's Fear Scale scales, for pain and fear reduction in children admitted at the septic ward of CoRSU Rehabilitation Hospital in Uganda. METHODS: In total, 79 children aged 4-17 years of age were offered to watch cartoons using VR glasses while undergoing painful dressing procedures. Before and after the procedure, children were asked to index current pain; children and their caregivers were asked to rate anticipated fear. Focus group discussions with 13 children, 10 caregivers and 9 nurses explored acceptability and feasibility. Quantitative data were analyzed using STATA15, NVIVO12 was used for qualitative data analysis. RESULTS: The VR glasses were accepted by 76 (96%) of the children. Children, caregivers, and nurses mentioned the glasses were helpful in distracting children from the medical procedure and felt the use of the glasses helped reduce child fear and pain. Nurses felt it made their work easier. The Wong-Baker Faces Pain Scale was an acceptable and feasible method to measure pain, while the Children's Fear Scale was more difficult to interpret for our study population as they felt the faces on the scale were hard to read and identify with. CONCLUSIONS: The use of VR glasses may offer an acceptable and effective pain and fear reduction method in resource-constrained settings and should be further explored in a randomized controlled trial.
Asunto(s)
Dolor , Realidad Virtual , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Miedo , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , UgandaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic injection injury is a major cause of disability in Ugandan children. Two injuries thought to result from injection of medications into the gluteal region include post-injection paralysis (PIP) and gluteal fibrosis (GF). This study aimed to describe perceptions of local health care workers regarding risk factors, particularly injections, for development of GF and PIP. Specifically, we examine the role of injection practices in the development of these injuries by interviewing a diverse cohort of individuals working in the health sector. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study in the Kumi and Wakiso Districts of Uganda in November 2017, utilizing 68 key informant interviews with individuals working in healthcare related fields. Interviews were structured utilizing a moderator guide focusing on injection practices, gluteal fibrosis and post-injection paralysis. RESULTS: We identified six themes regarding perceptions of the cause of GF and PIP and organized these themes into a theoretical framework. There was a consensus among the individuals working in healthcare that inadequacies of the health care delivery system may lead to inappropriate intramuscular injection practices, which are presumed to contribute to the development of GF and PIP. Poor access to medications and qualified personnel has led to the proliferation of private clinics, which are often staffed by under-trained practitioners. Misaligned economic incentives and a lack of training may also motivate practitioners to administer frequent intramuscular injections, which cost more than oral medications. A lack of regulatory enforcement enables these practices to persist. However, due to limited community awareness, patients often perceive these practitioners as appropriately trained, and the patients frequently prefer injections over alternative treatment modalities. CONCLUSION: This qualitative study suggests that inappropriate intramuscular injections, may arise from problems in the health care delivery system. To prevent the disability of GF and PIP, it is important to not only address the intramuscular injections practices in Uganda, but also to examine upstream deficits in access, education, and policy enforcement.