Attitudes and practices toward COVID-19 precautionary measures: A comparative study of health professionals and public.

BACKGROUND: Containment of the COVID-19 pandemic has been impaired by the denial and defiance of preventive recommendations. AIMS: We aimed to study the attitudes toward COVID-19 social measures among laypersons and healthcare professionals. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study in the United Arab Emirates using a self-administered online questionnaire. Both healthcare workers and laypersons were actively recruited. In addition to sociodemographic variables, the questionnaire included questions on anxiety, knowledge, and defiance related to COVID-19. RESULTS: A total of 615 individuals with a mean age of 32 years (SD, 12) participated. Females comprised 69% and healthcare workers constituted 60% of the study sample. Among laypersons, over 42% reported having social gatherings at home, and 44% admitted to visiting crowded places. More than half of the respondents felt increased anxiety. Previous COVID-19 infection did not affect attitudes or anxiety levels. Knowledge about COVID-19 was higher among those who were more educated (r = .21). Healthcare workers had lower anxiety than laypersons (p = .002). COVID-19 anxiety was higher among older persons and did not decrease with more knowledge. COVID-19 defiance was higher among younger male respondents from larger households and did not correlate with knowledge. Multivariate analysis showed more defiant attitudes at younger ages. CONCLUSIONS: Anxiety-related to the COVID-19 pandemic is more common in older individuals, whereas younger persons were more likely to deny and defy prevention recommendations despite having knowledge of viral transmission. Voluntary compliance by young individuals requires an engaging communication strategy to generate more compassionate attitudes.

Incidence of malignant pericardial effusion in pericardiocentesis patients and post-procedure care: an oncology center pilot study.

The etiology of pericardial effusion can affect many important factors during and after pericardiocentesis. The frequency of etiologies varies among different patient populations. Pericardiocentesis is an important diagnostic and therapeutic intervention; however, data on the characteristics of malignant pericardial effusion are lacking in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Thus, we conducted a pilot study on the incidence and post-procedure care of patients who underwent pericardiocentesis in our facility to enhance their management and treatment. This retrospective study included all cases of pericardiocentesis between 2011-2019. Epidemiological, clinical, and biochemical data were collected and analyzed. Pericardial fluid analysis, malignancy type, recurrence rate, need for a repeat procedure, and echocardiography findings were reviewed. Thirty-three patients (mean: 47.2 years) underwent pericardiocentesis, and 22 of these patients (66.7%) had malignancy. The predominant cancers were breast cancer (27.3%), lung cancer (27.3%), exudative pericardial effusion and malignant effusion (68%), and bloody fluid (73%). An average of 350 ml was drained from the patients, and the drain was retained for 4 days. Six patients (18.2%) had re-accumulation of pericardial effusion, and 4 patients required repeat procedures. All patients underwent post-procedure echocardiography, and 82% underwent follow-up echo within one week. More than two-thirds of our cancer patients had malignant pericardial effusion. The early diagnosis of the etiology of pericardial effusion may alter its management and prognosis. We would like to conduct further research to determine its influence on the prognosis of cancer patients in the UAE.