Effect of monthly high-dose vitamin D on bone density in community-dwelling older adults substudy of a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Severe vitamin D deficiency causes osteomalacia, yet trials of vitamin D supplementation in the community have not on average demonstrated benefit to bone mineral density (BMD) or fracture risk in adults. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether monthly high-dose vitamin D supplementation influences BMD in the general population and in those with low 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels. METHODS: Two-year substudy of a trial in older community-resident adults. A total of 452 participants were randomized to receive monthly doses of vitamin D3 100 000 IU, or placebo. The primary end-point was change in lumbar spine BMD. Exploratory analyses to identify thresholds of baseline 25-hydroxyvitamin D for vitamin D effects on BMD were prespecified. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat analyses showed no significant treatment effect in the lumbar spine (between-groups difference 0.0071 g cm-2 , 95%CI: -0.0012, 0.0154) or total body but BMD loss at both hip sites was significantly attenuated by ~1/2% over 2 years. There was a significant interaction between baseline 25-hydroxyvitamin D and treatment effect (P = 0.04). With baseline 25-hydroxyvitamin D ≤ 30 nmol L-1 (n = 46), there were between-groups BMD changes at the spine and femoral sites of ~2%, significant in the spine and femoral neck, but there was no effect on total body BMD. When baseline 25-hydroxyvitamin D was >30 nmol L-1 , differences were ~1/2% and significant only at the total hip. CONCLUSIONS: This substudy finds no clinically important benefit to BMD from untargeted vitamin D supplementation of older, community-dwelling adults. Exploratory analyses suggest meaningful benefit in those with baseline 25-hydroxyvitamin D ≤ 30 nmol L-1 . This represents a significant step towards a trial-based definition of vitamin D deficiency for bone health in older adults.

Incidence of ocular side effects with intravenous zoledronate: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

SUMMARY: This prospective study showed that the incidence of acute anterior uveitis, confirmed by ophthalmic examination, in patients receiving intravenous zoledronate infusions as part of a randomized controlled trial for fracture prevention is 1.1%. INTRODUCTION: We prospectively investigated the incidence of ocular side effects after a single intravenous zoledronate infusion. METHODS: In a secondary analysis of a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in which early post-menopausal women (N=1054) with normal bone density or osteopenia were randomized to infusion of zoledronate 5 mg (N=703) or placebo (N=351), we analyzed significant adverse ocular events occurring within 3 months. RESULTS: Fourteen participants reported ocular symptoms after the infusion. All were examined by an ophthalmologist and eight were diagnosed with acute anterior uveitis (AAU) and one with sectoral episcleritis. The incidence of AAU and episcleritis was 1.1% (95% CI 0.5-2.1) and 0.1% (95% CI 0.0-0.7), respectively, in the zoledronate group and 0% for both conditions in the placebo group (95% CI 0.0-0.8). The mean time from infusion to symptom onset for AAU was 3 days (range 2-4). Three cases were bilateral. AAU was mild-moderate in seven participants and severe in one. All affected eyes were treated with topical cyclopentolate 1% (to break, or minimize, posterior synechiae), and intensive, potent, topical corticosteroids with a tapering regime based on treatment response. The mean duration of topical corticosteroid was 26±10 days (range 17-44). The mean, best corrected visual acuity was 20/20 (range 20/20-20/40) at presentation, which remained unchanged after AAU resolution. None of the participants lost vision, and no long-term sequelae were reported at last follow-up (range 3-13 months post-infusion). CONCLUSIONS: Prescribers should inform patients about the possibility of ocular side effects with zoledronate infusions and refer promptly to an ophthalmologist if symptoms develop.