Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Urol Ann ; 14(3): 227-231, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36117796

RESUMEN

Objective: The objective of the study is to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and long-term outcome of en bloc renal pedicle control during laparoscopic nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy. Patients and Methods: A total of 126 nephrectomies and nephroureterectomies that underwent en bloc renal pedicle control using the endovascular stapler (45 or 60 mm vascular reload) were retrospectively analyzed. Perioperative outcomes, including the risk of arteriovenous fistula (AVF), hospital stay, and estimated blood loss, were recorded. Complications were reported using Clavien classification. Results: En bloc pedicle control was employed in 126 laparoscopic nephrectomies and nephroureterectomies on 126 patients with a mean age of 55.7 years (range: 18-94) and a mean body mass index of 29.2 kg/m2 (range: 17-42). All laparoscopic nephrectomies were performed or supervised by one of three minimally invasive surgeons using identical surgical techniques, even in cases of multiple hilar vessels. During follow-up with a mean 23.3 months (range: 12-48), no patients presented with radiological or clinical signs of AVF (91 patients where followed up with either Doppler ultrasound, computed tomography with contrast, or magnetic resonance imaging for different indications). The mean operative time was 91.8 min (range: 45-215). Intraoperative blood transfusion was required in two cases. Diaphragmatic injury occurred in one case but was repaired laparoscopically. Open conversion occurred in two cases with severe colonic adhesions and injury, with one requiring primary repair, and the other managed with a colostomy. One patient developed fever; two patients developed paralytic ileus. Hospital stay mode was 5 days, ranging from 3 to 10 days. Conclusion: En bloc renal pedicle control during laparoscopic nephrectomies is safe with reasonable operative time, and there were no indications of AVF with this technique over the long term.

2.
Urol Ann ; 14(2): 152-155, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35711485

RESUMEN

Introduction and Study Purpose: Renal pedicle control is a crucial period in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN). Till now, there is no standardized technique for renal pedicle control. Proper evaluation and investigation of the different ways of renal vessel control have to be done to avoid any calamitous event. We aim to prove the safety and reliability of the Hem-o-Lok clips for the renal vascular control in transperitoneal LDN. Methods: All LDNs or hand-assisted LDNs done between January 2016 and December 2018 were collected. The primary outcome was the safety of the Hem-o-Lok clips. The secondary outcomes were blood loss, ischemia time, hospital stay, cost, and operative time. The data were analyzed using SPSS 20, and a statistical package was conducted. Results: The data showed that 238 laparoscopic donor nephrectomies were done. The renal pedicle control during the 1st year was done using a vascular stapler for the artery (63 cases) and two polymer self-locking clips extra-large (XL) for the vein. Two events were reported in the form of mechanical failure. In the following 2 years, the artery was controlled using polymer self-locking clips large (L) few millimeters distal to the aorta and two metallic clips distal to it to increase the safety and stability of the vascular stump (175 cases). However, the vein was controlled by the two polymer self-locking clips XL. There was no reported intraoperative complications or events related to this way of pedicle control; there was no open conversion or blood transfusion required. There was no postoperative complication or collection in ultrasound. Conclusion: Using a combined polymer self-locking clip few millimeters distal to the aorta and two metallic clips distal to it for renal artery control in laparoscopic donor nephrectomies is cost-effective and safe. However, further and broader evidenced base studies are still needed to establish a standard technique for renal pedicle control.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA