RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Antiplatelet therapy is used for the primary and secondary prevention of thrombotic diseases such as acute coronary syndrome (ACS). These patients are more vulnerable to infections, as such, strategies are required to mitigate these risks. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using TriNetX, a global federated health research network that includes both inpatient and outpatient electronic medical records from health care organizations worldwide. Patients ≥18 years old, after ACS, who were placed on aspirin and ticagrelor were compared with patients placed on aspirin and clopidogrel or prasugrel. Patients were identified using International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems terminology codes. After propensity score matching (1:1), a total of 239,358 patients were identified in each cohort. The primary outcomes of interest investigated were rates of (1) acute and subacute infective endocarditis, (2) sepsis of unknown origin, (3) staphylococcus arthritis, (4) cellulitis and acute lymphangitis, (5) Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, and (6) staphylococcal pneumonia after initiation of treatment. Outcomes were analyzed at 1, 3, and 5 years. FINDINGS: At 5 years, a combination of aspirin and ticagrelor, compared with a combination of aspirin and clopidogrel or prasugrel, was associated with significantly reduced rates of (1) acute and subacute endocarditis (hazard ratio [HR] plus 95% CI) (HR = 0.85; 0.77-0.945; P = 0.030), (2) sepsis of unknown origin (HR = 0.89; 95% CI, 0.86-0.91; P < 0.0001), (3) cellulitis and acute lymphangitis (HR = 0.89; 95% CI, 0.87-0.92; P < 0.0001, and (4) Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (HR = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.61-0.85; P = 0.0007). However, a combination of aspirin and clopidogrel was associated with a marinally lower risk of staphylococcal pneumonia (HR = 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.062; P < 0.0001). IMPLICATIONS: A combination of aspirin and ticagrelor is associated with a lower rate of a variety of bacterial infections. This combination warrants further investigation in in-vitro studies to tease out mechanisms and through clinical randomized trials in groups who have ACS and are at high infection risk.
RESUMEN
Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) is an under-recognised yet highly prevalent microvascular complication of diabetes. CAN affects approximately 20% of people with diabetes, with recent studies highlighting the presence of CAN in prediabetes (impaired glucose tolerance and/or impaired fasting glucose), indicating early involvement of the autonomic nervous system. Understanding of the pathophysiology of CAN continues to evolve, with emerging evidence supporting a potential link between lipid metabolites, mitochondrial dysfunction and genetics. Recent advancements, such as streamlining CAN detection through wearable devices and monitoring of heart rate variability, present simplified and cost-effective approaches for early CAN detection. Further research on the optimal use of the extensive data provided by such devices is required. Despite the lack of specific pharmacological interventions targeting the underlying pathophysiology of autonomic neuropathy, several studies have suggested a favourable impact of newer glucose-lowering agents, such as sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, where there is a wealth of clinical trial data on the prevention of cardiovascular events. This review delves into recent developments in the area of CAN, with emphasis on practical guidance to recognise and manage this underdiagnosed condition, which significantly increases the risk of cardiovascular events and mortality in diabetes.
RESUMEN
AIM: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is), used as a glucose-lowering therapy in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D), have significant cardiorenal benefits, reducing hospitalization for heart failure (HF) and cardiovascular mortality in patients with and without T2D. Recent clinical trial evidence suggests their potential utility in preventing incident T2D among the high-risk HF populations. Therefore, we aimed to assess whether this finding was reproducible in a real-world setting. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of 484 643 patients with HF, without baseline diabetes, prescribed either angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers with/without SGLT2is (treatment, n = 42 018; reference, n = 442 625) across 95 global health care organizations, using a large real-world ecosystem. Propensity score matching balanced arms 1:1 for confounders (n = 39 168 each arm). Subgroup analysis further evaluated the impact on patients with prediabetes and the efficacy of dapagliflozin/empagliflozin, specifically, on incident T2D and secondary outcomes, including all-cause mortality, acute pulmonary oedema and hospitalization. RESULTS: Treatment with SGLT2is significantly reduced incident T2D {hazard ratio (HR) 0.71 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63, 0.75]} in patients with HF. The analysis of patients with prediabetes found that SGLT2is further reduced incident T2D [HR 0.62 (95% CI 0.45, 0.80)]. The magnitude of reduction in incident T2D was higher in patients prescribed dapagliflozin [HR 0.47 (95% CI 0.39, 0.56)] versus empagliflozin [HR 0.81 (95% CI 0.70, 0.93)]. CONCLUSION: Treatment with SGLT2is in patients with HF was associated with a reduced risk of incident T2D, most strikingly in people with prediabetes.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN) in diabetes mellitus (DM) is independently associated with cardiovascular (CV) events and CV death. Diagnosis of this complication of DM is time-consuming and not routinely performed in the clinical practice, in contrast to fundus retinal imaging which is accessible and routinely performed. Whether artificial intelligence (AI) utilizing retinal images collected through diabetic eye screening can provide an efficient diagnostic method for CAN is unknown. METHODS: This was a single center, observational study in a cohort of patients with DM as a part of the Cardiovascular Disease in Patients with Diabetes: The Silesia Diabetes-Heart Project (NCT05626413). To diagnose CAN, we used standard CV autonomic reflex tests. In this analysis we implemented AI-based deep learning techniques with non-mydriatic 5-field color fundus imaging to identify patients with CAN. Two experiments have been developed utilizing Multiple Instance Learning and primarily ResNet 18 as the backbone network. Models underwent training and validation prior to testing on an unseen image set. RESULTS: In an analysis of 2275 retinal images from 229 patients, the ResNet 18 backbone model demonstrated robust diagnostic capabilities in the binary classification of CAN, correctly identifying 93% of CAN cases and 89% of non-CAN cases within the test set. The model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCROC) of 0.87 (95% CI 0.74-0.97). For distinguishing between definite or severe stages of CAN (dsCAN), the ResNet 18 model accurately classified 78% of dsCAN cases and 93% of cases without dsCAN, with an AUCROC of 0.94 (95% CI 0.86-1.00). An alternate backbone model, ResWide 50, showed enhanced sensitivity at 89% for dsCAN, but with a marginally lower AUCROC of 0.91 (95% CI 0.73-1.00). CONCLUSIONS: AI-based algorithms utilising retinal images can differentiate with high accuracy patients with CAN. AI analysis of fundus images to detect CAN may be implemented in routine clinical practice to identify patients at the highest CV risk. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This is a part of the Silesia Diabetes-Heart Project (Clinical-Trials.gov Identifier: NCT05626413).
Asunto(s)
Aprendizaje Profundo , Neuropatías Diabéticas , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Neuropatías Diabéticas/diagnóstico , Neuropatías Diabéticas/fisiopatología , Neuropatías Diabéticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neuropatías Diabéticas/etiología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Retinopatía Diabética/diagnóstico , Retinopatía Diabética/diagnóstico por imagen , Retinopatía Diabética/epidemiología , Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador , Sistema Nervioso Autónomo/fisiopatología , Sistema Nervioso Autónomo/diagnóstico por imagen , Fondo de Ojo , Cardiopatías/diagnóstico por imagen , Cardiopatías/diagnóstico , Adulto , Inteligencia ArtificialRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: From 2008 and following the withdrawal of rosiglitazone, obligatory cardiovascular outcomes trials are performed for glucose lowering drugs introduced to the market to ensure their cardiovascular (CV) safety. Paradoxically, these studies have demonstrated CV safety but also shown additional cardio-reno-vascular protection of some therapeutic agents. Additionally, nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (ns-MRA) have emerged as novel drugs for cardio - and renoprotection in type 2 diabetes (T2D) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). In addition to atherosclerotic CV disease, heart failure (HF) and CKD are important clinical problems in T2D leading to poor quality of life and premature death as such cardio-reno-vascular protection is an important clinical issue. AREAS COVERED: We provide new insights into pharmacotherapeutic cardio-reno-vascular protection in T2D based on the new glucose lowering drugs and ns-MRA. PUB MED/CINAHL/Web of Science/Scopus were searched (May 2024). EXPERT OPINION: The conventional glucose lowering approach alone which was implemented for decades is now replaced by the use of disease modifying drugs which lower the rates of CV events, HF decompensation, hospitalization due to HF, slow progression of CKD and all-cause mortality. Indeed, the choice of medications in T2D should be focused on underlying co-morbidities with cardio-reno-vascular protection rather than a gluco-centric approach.
RESUMEN
Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is an inflammatory joint and entheseal disease associated with significant personal and public health burden. PsA has a prevalence of up to 1%, affecting ~20% of people suffering with psoriasis. PsA is frequently accompanied by metabolic syndrome (MetS), and both conditions are characterised by a chronic pro-inflammatory state, with several key cytokines in PsA (interleukin (IL)-17 and IL-23) also elevated in those with MetS. This narrative review aims to provide an update on MetS in PsA, focusing on its prevalence, pathogenesis, prognosis, treatment interactions and future therapeutic options. MetS is particularly prevalent in PsA compared to other inflammatory arthritides. Cohort studies indicate a higher risk of PsA in individuals with obesity, while Mendelian randomization studies link childhood obesity, insulin resistance, and dyslipidaemia to PsA. Weight loss interventions have been shown to reduce disease activity in PsA. Additionally, MetS negatively impacts the efficacy of tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) drugs in treating PsA. Drugs given for PsA may also affect the conditions constituting MetS. Leflunomide has been shown to reduce body weight but also increase blood pressure. TNFi drugs lead to weight gain but reduce cardiovascular risk. Janus kinase inhibitors increase lipid levels and cardiovascular risk among high-risk groups. Anti-IL-17 and anti-IL-12/IL-23 drugs may cause a short-term increase in cardiovascular risk, although the long-term effects have yet to be established. Weight loss represents an unexplored avenue for disease modification in PsA, alongside a plethora of general health benefits. Dietary and exercise modifications are the cornerstone of weight management but vary substantially across individuals. Novel therapies to treat weight loss, such as glucagon-like peptide 1 agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, may prove useful alongside disease-modifying therapies for those with PsA and MetS and should be investigated as potential therapeutic adjuncts.
What effects do obesity and related health problems have on psoriatic arthritis? Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a condition that causes joint pain and swelling, which can lead to permanent damage to the joints over time. This condition affects 1 in 100 people and 1 in 5 people with psoriasis. Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a condition where a person has a combination of high body fat, high blood pressure, high blood sugar and/or high cholesterol. MetS is more common in someone with PsA. If a person has MetS, they are more likely to get PsA. If a person with PsA has MetS, they have worse joint problems and their joint problems do not improve as much with certain treatments. Many of the drugs given for PsA can affect MetS. This can include increasing or decreasing body weight, increasing blood pressure and increasing or decreasing the risk of having a heart attack or stroke. Different medications affect these risks in different ways. Weight loss helps people with PsA improve their joint problems. However, some people find losing weight harder than others. Medications that can help people lose weight, could be useful to improve joint problems in PsA. Future studies should see if these medications can be useful in people with PsA and MetS.
RESUMEN
AIMS: To develop a standardised, automated protocol for detecting protein gene product 9.5 (PGP9.5) positive intra-epidermal nerve fibres (IENFs) in skin biopsies, transitioning from the established manual technique to an automated platform. This automated method, although currently intended for research applications, may improve the accessibility of this diagnostic test for small fibre neuropathy in clinical settings. METHODS: Skin biopsies (n = 274) from 100 participants (fibromyalgia syndrome n = 62; idiopathic small fibre neuropathy: n = 16; healthy volunteers: n = 22) were processed using an automated immunohistochemistry platform. IENF quantification was performed by blinded examiners, with reliability assessed via a two-way mixed-effects model to evaluate inter- and intra-observer variability. RESULTS: The automated staining system reproduced intra-epidermal nerve fibre density (IENFD) counts consistent with free-floating sections (mean ± standard deviation: free-floating: 5.6 ± 3.4 fibres/mm; automated: 5.9 ± 3.2 fibres/mm). A median difference of 0.3 with a lower bound 95% Confidence Interval (CI) at -0.00005 established non-inferiority against a margin of -0.4 (p = .08). Specifically, the inter-class correlation coefficient (class denotes consistency in measured observations) was 99% (95% CI: 0.9-1), indicating excellent agreement between free-floating and automated methods. The inter- and intra-class coefficient between examiners were both 99% (95% CI: 0.9-0.1) for IENFD, demonstrating high reliability using sections stained using the automated method. INTERPRETATION: Automated immunohistochemistry provides high-throughput reliable and reproducible intra-epidermal nerve fibre quantification. This method, although currently proof-of-concept, for research use only, may be more widely deployed in histopathology laboratories to increase the adoption of IENFD assessment for the diagnosis of peripheral neuropathies.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the relative association between sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1Ra) with the incidence of gout in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) using real-world data. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study using data from TriNetX (an international federated database). We included patients commenced on metformin or insulin, either alone or with an SGLT2i or GLP-1Ra, at least 2 years prior to date of analysis. We propensity score matched (PSM) (1:1) for 26 relevant characteristics. Time to event analysis was performed to assess the incidence of gout, all-cause mortality (positive control), and herpes zoster infection (negative control) at 5 years following drug initiation. FINDINGS: Prior to PSM, the cohort numbers were as follows: metformin control, 1,111,449; SGLT2i with metformin, 101,706; GLP-1Ra with metformin, 110,180, insulin control, 1,398,066; SGLT2i with insulin, 68,697; and GLP-1Ra with insulin, 99,693. SGLT2i with metformin demonstrated a statistically significant decreased incidence of gout at 5 years compared to the metformin control cohort (HR 0.75 [95% CI 0.69-0.82], P < 0.0001). Similarly, SGLT2i with insulin demonstrated a statistically significant decreased incidence of gout at 5 years compared to the insulin control cohort (HR 0.83 [95% CI 0.74-0.92], P < 0.0001). Conversely, no significant disparity in gout incidence was observed between the use of GLP-1Ra and matched controls. Subgroup analysis showed an associated reduced incidence of gout with SGLT2i use compared to GLP-1Ra, in groups using metformin (HR 0.77 [95% CI 0.70-0.86], P < 0.0001) or insulin (HR 0.82 [95% CI 0.73-0.91)], P < 0.0001). IMPLICATIONS: In this large-scale real-world study, SGLT2i use was associated with a lower incidence of gout in patients with T2D compared to both insulin and metformin controls. These findings suggest the potential of SGLT2i as a promising therapeutic option for treating gout in this population.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and 2-hour postload plasma glucose (2hPG) measured during an oral glucose tolerance test, and the risk of developing diabetes in Chinese adults. METHODS: We followed 3,094 participants without diabetes, categorizing them based on their oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) results into low post load (2hPG ≤ FPG) and high post load (2hPG > FPG) at baseline. We monitored the incidence of diabetes, incidence of prediabetes, disease progression from prediabetes to diabetes and disease reversal from prediabetes to normal glucose tolerance (NGT) over an average of 3.2 years of follow-up. After the Schoenfeld residual test, Cox's time-varying covariate (Cox-TVC) models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) to compare the different clinical events between low and high post load groups. RESULTS: In the cohort study, of the 3,094 participants, 702 (22.7 %) had low post load (2hPG ≤ FPG, mean postload-fasting gap: -0.8 ± 0.7 mmol/L) and 2,392 (77.3 %) had high post load (2hPG > FPG, mean postload-fasting gap: 1.8 ± 1.2 mmol/L). Over 3.2 ± 0.2 years of follow-up, 282 (9.1 %) developed diabetes. In the low post load group, the incidence rates per 1,000 person-years were: diabetes was 7.9, prediabetes was 70.0, disease progression from prediabetes to diabetes was 23.4 and disease reversal to NGT was 327.2. For the high post load group, incidence rates for diabetes was 13.9, prediabetes was 124.3, disease progression was 59.5 and disease reversal was 238.6 per 1,000 person-years. Participants with high post load showed higher incidence rates of diabetes, prediabetes, and progression from prediabetes to diabetes compared to those with low post load. HRs were significantly higher for incident diabetes and prediabetes, and disease progression from prediabetes to diabetes, whereas disease reversal was lower. CONCLUSION: The risk of developing prediabetes/diabetes after 3.2 years of follow-up was higher in the participants with high post load. It suggested that postload-fasting gap may be a simple tool to predict the risk of developing prediabetes, diabetes or reversal to NGT.
Asunto(s)
Glucemia , Ayuno , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa , Estado Prediabético , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Glucemia/análisis , Glucemia/metabolismo , Estudios Prospectivos , Estado Prediabético/epidemiología , Estado Prediabético/sangre , Adulto , Ayuno/sangre , Incidencia , China/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Pueblo Asiatico/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/sangre , Pueblos del Este de AsiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We examined the impact of a co-diagnosis of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) on patient outcomes. METHODS: Using TriNetX, a global federated research network (n = 114 million), we undertook two retrospective cohort studies, using time-to-event analysis. Analysis 1 compared MASLD with T2D to MASLD alone; analysis 2 compared T2D with MASLD to T2D alone. Propensity score matching using greedy nearest neighbour (calliper .1) balanced the cohorts (1:1) for significant covariates. Primary outcomes were cardiovascular, liver, diabetes-related, and cancer events over 5 years. RESULTS: Analysis 1 (n = 95 275): a co-diagnosis of T2D significantly increased the risk of ischaemic heart disease (IHD) (HR 1.39; CI: 1.34, 1.44), ischaemic stroke (HR 1.45; CI: 1.35, 1.56), heart failure (HR 1.42; CI: 1.36, 1.49), atrial fibrillation (HR 1.09; CI: 1.03, 1.16), hepatocellular carcinoma (HR 1.96; CI: 1.69, 2.27), pancreatic cancer (HR 1.25; CI: 1.06, 1.48) and liver-related complications over 5 years from MASLD diagnosis. Analysis 2 (n = 15 208): a co-diagnosis of MASLD significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR 1.11; CI: 1.02, 1.22), IHD (HR 1.181; CI: 1.08, 1.29), hepatocellular (HR 50.31; CI: 6.94, 364.72), pancreatic (HR 1.78; CI: 1.12, 2.84), breast (HR 1.43; CI: 1.09, 1.88) and renal cancer (HR 2.01; CI: 1.24, 3.26), and diabetic neuropathy (HR 1.17; CI: 1.09, 1.27) over 5 years from metformin initiation. CONCLUSIONS: T2D significantly potentiates the risk of cardiovascular, malignancy and liver-related outcomes in people with MASLD. The effect of MASLD on people with T2D, although less dramatic, still potentiated risk of death, IHD, malignancy and peripheral neuropathy.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Sleep disturbance has been associated with chronic widespread pain (CWP), but their causal relationship remains unclear. We aimed to examine the causal relationship and direction between CWP and sleep traits, namely insomnia, sleep duration and chronotype, using Mendelian Randomization. METHOD: We used genetic association data from ~0.5 million individuals and up to 1.8 million controls from the UK Biobank (UKB). All traits were defined predominantly by self-report. Short sleep duration was defined as average ≤6 hours per 24 hours. Chronotype refers to the inclination to sleep at certain times where some wake and go to bed early ('morning' person), and others wake and go to sleep later ('evening' person). To permit use of the largest available genetic association data, we used the Causal Analysis Using Summary Effect estimates (CAUSE) method, which allows for sample overlap. RESULTS: Insomnia (OR 1.009, 95% credible interval 1.005, 1.014; p = 0.018 that the causal model is a better fit than non-causal model) and short sleep duration (OR 1.060, 95%CrI 1.038, 1.083; p = 0.040) were causally associated with increased risk of CWP, with limited evidence for reverse causation. There was no evidence in support of long sleep duration or chronotype being associated with CWP. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggest that insomnia and short sleep duration (≤6 hours) are associated with an increased risk of CWP. Improving short sleep duration and insomnia, rather than chronotype, may be effective in reducing the risk of CWP, although these results should be replicated in epidemiological and interventional studies.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The clinical impact of Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease(NAFLD) in patients with atrial fibrillation(AF) is still controversial. AIM: To evaluate the 1-year risk of all-cause death, thromboembolic events, and bleeding in AF-NAFLD patients. METHODS: Retrospective study with a health research network(TriNetX). AF patients on oral anticoagulation(OAC) were categorized according to the presence of NAFLD into two groups. The primary outcomes were the 1-year risks of: i) a composite cardiovascular outcome (all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiac arrest, and pulmonary embolism); and ii) a composite hemorrhagic outcome(intracranial hemorrhage and gastrointestinal bleeding). Cox regression analysis before and after propensity-score-matching(PSM) was used to estimate Hazard Ratio(HR) and 95% confidence intervals(95%CI). Sensitivity analyses investigated the risk associated with cirrhosis, thrombocytopenia, and type of OAC(warfarin vs non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants(NOAC). RESULTS: We identified 22,636 AF-NAFLD patients (69±12 years, 46.7% females) and 391,014 AF patients without liver disease(72±12 years, 42.7% females). NAFLD was associated with a higher risk of composite cardiovascular (HR 1.54,95%CI 1.47-1.61) and hemorrhagic (HR 1.56,95%CI 1.42-1.72) outcomes. This was consistent also for all the single outcomes. Cirrhotic and thrombocytopenic AF-NAFLD patients showed the highest risks. Compared to AF-NAFLD patients on NOAC, those on warfarin were associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular and hemorrhagic outcomes. CONCLUSION: In AF patients, NAFLD is associated with a higher 1-year risk of adverse events, with the risk of adverse events progressively increasing from non-cirrhotic to cirrhotic and from non-thrombocytopenic to thrombocytopenic patients. NOACs were associated with a better effectiveness and safety profile compared to warfarin.
RESUMEN
Aims: We compared the glycaemic and cardiorenal effects of combination therapy involving metformin, pioglitazone, sodium-glucose-linked-cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i), and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) versus a more conventional glucocentric treatment approach combining sulphonylureas (SU) and insulin from the point of type 2 diabetes (T2D) diagnosis. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using the Global Collaborative Network in TriNetX. We included individuals prescribed metformin, pioglitazone, an SGLT2i, and a GLP-1 RA for at least 1-year duration, within 3 years of a T2D diagnosis, and compared with individuals prescribed insulin and a SU within the same temporal pattern. Individuals were followed up for 3 years. Results: We propensity score-matched (PSM) for 26 variables. A total of 1762 individuals were included in the final analysis (n = 881 per cohort). At 3-years, compared to the insulin/SU group, the metformin/pioglitazone/SGLT2i/GLP-1 RA group had a lower risk of heart failure (HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.13-0.87, p = 0.018), acute coronary syndrome (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.12-0.67, p = 0.002), stroke (HR 0.17, 95% CI 0.06-0.49, p < 0.001), chronic kidney disease (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.25-0.99, p = 0.042), and hospitalisation (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.46-0.77, p < 0.001). Conclusions: In this real-world study, early, intensive polytherapy, targeting the distinct pathophysiological defects in T2D, is associated with significantly more favourable cardiorenal outcomes, compared to insulin and SU therapy.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Quimioterapia Combinada , Receptor del Péptido 1 Similar al Glucagón , Hipoglucemiantes , Insulina , Metformina , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2 , Compuestos de Sulfonilurea , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Masculino , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Metformina/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Sulfonilurea/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2/uso terapéutico , Insulina/uso terapéutico , Receptor del Péptido 1 Similar al Glucagón/agonistas , Pioglitazona/uso terapéutico , Bases de Datos Factuales , Glucemia/metabolismo , Glucemia/efectos de los fármacos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
AIM: To evaluate the impact of denosumab on (i) the incidence of type 2 diabetes (T2D), and (ii) long-term health outcomes (microvascular [neuropathy, retinopathy, nephropathy] and macrovascular [cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular accident] complications, and all-cause mortality) in patients with T2D, before (iii) combining results with prior studies using meta-analysis. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of data in a large global federated database (TriNetX; Cambridge, MA) was conducted from 331 375 patients, without baseline T2D or cancer, prescribed either denosumab (treatment, n = 45 854) or bisphosphonates (control, n = 285 521), across 83 healthcare organizations. Propensity score matching (1:1) of confounders was undertaken that resulted in 45 851 in each cohort. Secondary analysis further evaluated the impact of denosumab on long-term health outcomes in patients with T2D. Additionally, we systematically searched prior literature that assessed the association between denosumab and T2D. Estimates were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Risk of bias and evidence quality were assessed using Cochrane-endorsed tools. RESULTS: Denosumab (vs. bisphosphonates) was associated with a lower risk of incident T2D over 5 years (hazard ratio 0.83 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.78-0.88]). Secondary analysis showed significant risk reduction in all-cause mortality (0.79 [0.72-0.87]) and foot ulceration (0.67 [0.53-0.86]). Also, pooled results from four studies (three observational, one randomized controlled trial) following meta-analysis showed a reduced relative risk (RR [95% CI]) for incident T2D in patients prescribed denosumab (0.83 [0.79-0.87]) (I2 = 10.76%). CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest cohort study to show that denosumab treatment is associated with a reduced RR of incident T2D, as well as an associated reduced RR of all-cause mortality and microvascular complications, findings that may influence guideline development in the treatment of osteoporosis, particularly in patients who are at a high risk of T2D.
Asunto(s)
Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea , Denosumab , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Difosfonatos , Osteoporosis , Humanos , Denosumab/uso terapéutico , Denosumab/efectos adversos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/mortalidad , Incidencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/efectos adversos , Femenino , Masculino , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteoporosis/epidemiología , Anciano , Difosfonatos/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pie Diabético/prevención & control , Pie Diabético/epidemiología , Pie Diabético/mortalidad , Pie Diabético/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Estudios de CohortesAsunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2 , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
The prevalence of obesity in older adults (people aged >60 years) is increasing in line with the demographic shift in global populations. Despite knowledge of obesity-related complications in younger adults (increased risk of type 2 diabetes, liver and cardiovascular disease and malignancy), these considerations may be outweighed, in older adults, by concerns regarding weight-loss induced reduction in skeletal muscle and bone mass, and the awareness of the 'obesity paradox'. Obesity in the elderly contributes to various obesity-related complications from cardiometabolic disease and cancer, to functional decline, worsening cognition, and quality of life, that will have already suffered an age-related decline. Lifestyle interventions remain the cornerstone of obesity management in older adults, with emphasis on resistance training for muscle strength and bone mineral density preservation. However, in older adults with obesity refractory to lifestyle strategies, pharmacotherapy, using anti-obesity medicines (AOMs), can be a useful adjunct. Recent evidence suggests that intentional weight loss in older adults with overweight and obesity is effective and safe, hence a diminishing reluctance to use AOMs in this more vulnerable population. Despite nine AOMs being currently approved for the treatment of obesity, limited clinical trial evidence in older adults predominantly focuses on incretin therapy with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (liraglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide). AOMs enhance weight loss and reduce cardiometabolic events, while maintaining muscle mass. Future randomised controlled trials should specifically evaluate the effectiveness of novel AOMs for long-term weight management in older adults with obesity, carefully considering the impact on body composition and functional ability, as well as health economics.
RESUMEN
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: A protective role of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1-ra) in the development of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular oedema has been described in some recent studies, which may extend beyond glycaemic control. We aimed to review the clinical impact of SGLT2i and GLP1-ra therapy on the risk of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular oedema in individuals with type 2 diabetes taking insulin. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort analysis of approximately two million people with type 2 diabetes receiving insulin across 97 healthcare organisations using a global federated health research network (TriNetX, Cambridge, USA). Two intervention cohorts (SGLT2i + insulin, n=176,409; GLP1-ra + insulin, n=207,034) were compared against a control cohort (insulin with no SGLT2i/GLP1-ra, n=1,922,312). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed and estimated HRs were reported for each outcome. Propensity score was used to 1:1 match for age, sex, ischaemic heart disease, hypertension, microvascular complications, chronic kidney disease, HbA1c, BMI and use of pioglitazone, lipid modifying agents, antilipemic agents, ACE inhibitors, angiotensin II inhibitors and metformin. A sub-analysis comparing the two intervention cohorts was also performed. RESULTS: SGLT2i with insulin was associated with a reduced HR (95% CI) for diabetic macular oedema compared with the control cohort (0.835; 0.780, 0.893), while GLP1-ra with insulin demonstrated a lack of signal with no statistical significance to the HR (1.013; 0.960, 1.069). SGLT2i with insulin was not associated with a clinically significant increase in the risk of developing diabetic retinopathy (1.076; 1.027, 1.127), while GLP1-ra with insulin increased diabetic retinopathy risk (1.308; 1.261, 1.357). Compared with SGLT2i with insulin, GLP1-ra with insulin was associated with higher risk of diabetic retinopathy (1.205; 1.153, 1.259) and diabetic macular oedema (1.130; 1.056, 1.208). CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Our study suggests that the combination of SGLT2i and insulin is associated with lower risk of developing diabetic macular oedema. However, the use of GLP1-ra was associated with an increased risk of diabetic retinopathy in individuals with type 2 diabetes also taking insulin. A comparative analysis showed favourable outcomes with SGLT2i and insulin in the development of diabetic macular oedema and diabetic retinopathy. RCTs using dedicated retinal imaging are required to determine the causal relationship with these therapies.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Retinopatía Diabética , Receptor del Péptido 1 Similar al Glucagón , Edema Macular , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2 , Humanos , Retinopatía Diabética/tratamiento farmacológico , Retinopatía Diabética/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2/uso terapéutico , Edema Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Edema Macular/epidemiología , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Receptor del Péptido 1 Similar al Glucagón/agonistas , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Insulina/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy and cardiovascular outcomes of combination pioglitazone with either a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) or a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) by conducting a systematic review, meta-analysis, and analysis of a large international real-world database. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, SCOPUS and Web of Science to identify relevant articles for inclusion (PROSPERO [CRD: 42023483126]). Nineteen studies assessing pioglitazone + SGLT2 inhibitors or GLP-1RAs versus controls were identified, 16 of which were randomized controlled trials. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane-endorsed tools and quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE. We additionally performed a retrospective cohort study of all individuals aged 18 years or over with T2D, using the TriNetX platform. We included propensity-score-matched individuals who were treated for at least 1 year with pioglitazone and a GLP-1RA or pioglitazone and an SGLT2 inhibitor, compared against GLP-1RA and SGLT2 inhibitor monotherapy. Outcomes were all-cause mortality, heart failure, chronic kidney disease and composite stroke and transient ischaemic attack. RESULTS: The average follow-up in the included studies ranged from 24 to 52 weeks. Combination of pioglitazone with a GLP-1RA reduced glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and weight greater than in controls: mean differences -1% (95% confidence interval [CI] -1.27, -0.74) and -1.19 kg (95% CI -1.80, -0.58), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in systolic blood pressure (SBP) or mortality between groups: mean difference - 1.56 mmHg (95% CI -4.48, 1.35; p = 0.30) and relative risk (RR) 0.29 (95% CI 0.07-1.15; p = 0.08), respectively. Combination of pioglitazone with SGLT2 inhibitors reduced HbA1c, weight and SBP to a greater extent than control treatment: mean differences -0.48% (95% CI -0.67, -0.28), -2.3 kg (95% CI -2.72, -1.88) and -2.4 mmHg (95% CI -4.1, -0.7; p = 0.01), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality between groups (RR 1.81, 95% CI 0.30-10.97; p = 0.52). The included trials demonstrated a reduction in risk of heart failure with combination treatment. Similarly, from the real-world database (n = 25 230 identified), pioglitazone and SGLT2 inhibitor combination therapy was associated with reduced risk of heart failure compared to monotherapy alone (hazard ratio 0.50, 95% CI 0.38-0.65; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Both our systematic review/meta-analysis and the real-world dataset show that combination of pioglitazone with either GLP-1RAs or SGLT2 inhibitors is associated with increased weight loss and reduced risk of heart failure compared with monotherapy.