Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
J Assist Reprod Genet ; 38(3): 645-650, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33454901

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To determine the utility of the endometrial receptivity analysis (ERA) in women with prior failed embryo transfers (ET). METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent an ERA test with a subsequent frozen ET. Women were classified based on their indication for an ERA test: (1) ≥ 1 prior failed ET (cases), or (2) as a prophylactic measure (controls). A subset analysis of women with ≥ 3 prior failed transfers was performed. Pregnancy outcomes of the subsequent cycle were examined, including conception, clinical pregnancy, and ongoing pregnancy/live birth. RESULTS: A total of 222 women were included, 131 (59%) women with ≥ 1 prior failed ET and 91 (41%) controls. Among the 131 women with ≥ 1 prior failed ET, 20 women (9%) had ≥ 3 prior failed ETs. The proportion of non-receptive ERA tests in the three groups were the following: 45% (≥ 1 prior failed ET), 40% (≥ 3 prior failed ETs), and 52% (controls). The results did not differ between cases and controls. The pregnancy outcomes did not differ between women with ≥ 1 prior failed ET and controls. In women with ≥ 3 prior failed ETs, there was a lower ongoing pregnancy/live birth rate (28% vs 54%, P = 0.046). CONCLUSION: Women with ≥ 1 prior failed ET and ≥ 3 prior failed ETs had a similar prevalence of non-receptive endometrium compared to controls. Women with ≥ 3 prior failed ETs had a lower ongoing pregnancy/live birth rate despite a personalized FET, suggesting that there are additional factors in implantation failure beyond an adjustment in progesterone exposure.


Asunto(s)
Endometrio/fisiopatología , Fertilización In Vitro/métodos , Infertilidad Femenina/terapia , Nacimiento Vivo/epidemiología , Adulto , Implantación del Embrión , Transferencia de Embrión , Femenino , Humanos , Infertilidad Femenina/fisiopatología , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
J Reprod Med ; 56(9-10): 398-404, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22010523

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the DISC (Dominance, Influence, Steadiness/Submission, and Conscientious/ Compliance) assessment correlates with obstetrics and gynecology resident performance. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 46 residents completed the DISC assessment. Residents were classified as "administrators" based on service to the program or as "concerning" if they were on remediation. Residents were categorized by negative comments by nurses or other residents and severe adverse event (SAE)/patient complaints. A quantitative assessment of compliance was used to assess residents. In-service examination scores and faculty evaluations of residents were analyzed. A p value of < 0.05 was taken as significant. RESULTS: Residents with SAE/patient complaints had higher Influence (p = 0.021) and lower Conscientious/Compliance scores (p = 0.029). Administrator-residents demonstrated a positive correlation with Dominance (r = 0.336, p = 0.042). In-service examination scores positively correlated with Dominance and negatively with Steadiness/Submission. There was a negative correlation between resident compliance scores (based on residency requirements) and Steadiness/Submission (r = -0.495, p = 0.043). CONCLUSION: Residents who are successful in executing administrative duties, provide safe patient care, or obtain high scores on examinations may have a DISC profile that is high in Dominance and Conscientious/Compliance but lower in Steadiness/Submission and Influence. Implementation of programs to promote emotional intelligence may allow for increased compassionate and safe patient care.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Ginecología/educación , Internado y Residencia , Obstetricia/educación , Determinación de la Personalidad , Personalidad , Competencia Clínica , Emoción Expresada , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas
3.
Rev Cardiovasc Med ; 10(2): 83-90, 2009.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19593320

RESUMEN

The prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is estimated to be nearly 10% among reproductive age women. PCOS may represent the largest underappreciated segment of the female population at risk of cardiovascular disease. Clinicians providing care to women of childbearing age must recognize the presenting clues, including irregular menses, hirsutism, alopecia, hyperandrogenemia, and obesity. The pathophysiology of PCOS is complex, involving the hypothalamus-pituitary-ovarian axis, ovarian theca cell hyperplasia, hyperinsulinemia, and a multitude of other cytokine- and adipocyte-driven factors. Cardiac risk factors associated with PCOS have public health implications and should drive early screening and intervention measures. There are no consensus guidelines regarding screening for cardiovascular disease in patients with PCOS. Fasting lipid profiles and glucose examinations should be performed regularly. Carotid intimal medial thickness examinations should begin at age 30 years, and coronary calcium screening should begin at age 45 years. Treatment of the associated cardiovascular risk factors, including insulin resistance, hypertension, and dyslipidemia, should be incorporated into the routine PCOS patient wellness care program.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico/complicaciones , Salud de la Mujer , Adulto , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico/diagnóstico , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico/fisiopatología , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico/terapia , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo
4.
Rev Obstet Gynecol ; 2(4): 232-9, 2009.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20111659

RESUMEN

The prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is estimated to be nearly 10% among reproductive-age women. PCOS may represent the largest underappreciated segment of the female population at risk of cardiovascular disease. Clinicians providing care to women of childbearing age must recognize the presenting clues, including irregular menses, hirsutism, alopecia, hyperandrogenemia, and obesity. The pathophysiology of PCOS is complex, involving the hypothalamus-pituitary-ovarian axis, ovarian theca cell hyperplasia, hyperinsulinemia, and a multitude of other cytokine- and adipocyte-driven factors. Cardiac risk factors associated with PCOS have public health implications and should drive early screening and intervention measures. There are no consensus guidelines regarding screening for cardiovascular disease in patients with PCOS. Fasting lipid profiles and glucose examinations should be performed regularly. Carotid intimal medial thickness examinations should begin at age 30 years, and coronary calcium screening should begin at age 45 years. Treatment of the associated cardiovascular risk factors, including insulin resistance, hypertension, and dyslipidemia, should be incorporated into the routine PCOS patient wellness care program.

5.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 199(6): 596-609, 2008 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19084097

RESUMEN

Women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) have a myriad of phenotypic and clinical features that may guide therapeutic options for metabolic protection and ovulation induction. The use of metformin may prove beneficial in a subset of the population of women with PCOS. Hyperinsulinemia, as demonstrated by elevated insulin levels on a 2-hour 75-g load glucose tolerance test, is an important parameter in deciding whether or not to initiate metformin therapy to women with PCOS with the hope of preventing or delaying the onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). Cardiovascular risk factors including markers of subclinical inflammation, and dyslipidemia may also be improved by metformin therapy. For ovulation induction, metformin is not as effective as clomiphene citrate as first-line therapy for women with PCOS. There are no clear data to suggest that metformin reduces pregnancy loss or improves pregnancy outcome in PCOS, and it is currently recommended that metformin be discontinued with the first positive pregnancy test result, unless there are other medical indications (eg, type 2 DM). This review addresses practical management guidelines for the uses of metformin in women with PCOS.


Asunto(s)
Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Resistencia a la Insulina , Metformina/uso terapéutico , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Clomifeno/efectos adversos , Clomifeno/uso terapéutico , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/efectos adversos , Infertilidad Femenina/tratamiento farmacológico , Infertilidad Femenina/etiología , Metformina/efectos adversos , Ovulación/efectos de los fármacos , Ovulación/fisiología , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico/complicaciones , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico/diagnóstico , Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo , Embarazo de Alto Riesgo , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Tiazolidinedionas/efectos adversos , Tiazolidinedionas/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA