RESUMEN
Aims: Direct current cardioversion (DCCV) is a commonly utilized rhythm control technique for atrial fibrillation. Follow-up typically comprises a hospital visit for 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) two weeks post-DCCV. We report the feasibility, costs, and environmental benefit of remote photoplethysmography (PPG) monitoring as an alternative. Methods and results: We retrospectively analysed DCCV cases at our centre from May 2020 to October 2022. Patients were stratified into those with remote PPG follow-up and those with traditional 12-lead ECG follow-up. Monitoring type was decided by the specialist nurse performing the DCCV at the time of the procedure after discussing with the patient and offering them both options if appropriate. Outcomes included the proportion of patients who underwent PPG monitoring, patient compliance and experience, and cost, travel, and environmental impact. Four hundred sixteen patients underwent 461 acutely successful DCCV procedures. Two hundred forty-six underwent PPG follow-up whilst 214 underwent ECG follow-up. Patient compliance was high (PPG 89.4% vs. ECG 89.8%; P > 0.999) and the majority of PPG users (90%) found the app easy to use. Sinus rhythm was maintained in 71.1% (PPG) and 64.7% (ECG) of patients (P = 0.161). Twenty-nine (11.8%) PPG patients subsequently required an ECG either due to non-compliance, technical failure, or inconclusive PPG readings. Despite this, mean healthcare costs (£47.91 vs. £135 per patient; P < 0.001) and median cost to the patient (£0 vs. £5.97; P < 0.001) were lower with PPG. Median travel time per patient (0 vs. 44â min; P < 0.001) and CO2 emissions (0 vs. 3.59â kg; P < 0.001) were also lower with PPG. No safety issues were identified. Conclusion: Remote PPG monitoring is a viable method of assessing for arrhythmia recurrence post-DCCV. This approach may save patients significant travel time, reduce environmental CO2 emission, and be cost saving in a publicly-funded healthcare system.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: VEXAS (vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic) syndrome is a newly discovered autoinflammatory condition characterised by somatic mutation of the UBA1 gene. The syndrome leads to multi-system inflammation affecting predominantly the skin, lungs and bone marrow. METHODS: We undertook a systematic review of the multisystem features and genotypes observed in VEXAS syndrome. Articles discussing VEXAS syndrome were included. Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched. Information was extracted on: demographics, type and prevalence of clinical manifestations, genetic mutations and treatment. Meta-analysis using a random effects model was used to determine pooled estimates of serum markers. RESULTS: From 303 articles, 90 were included, comprising 394 patients with VEXAS. 99.2% were male, with a mean age of 67.1 years (SD 8.5) at disease onset. The most frequent diagnoses made prior to VEXAS were: relapsing polychondritis (n = 59); Sweet's syndrome (n = 24); polyarteritis nodosa (n = 11); and myelodysplastic syndrome (n = 10). Fever was reported in 270 cases (68.5%) and weight loss in 79 (20.1%). Most patients had haematological (n = 342; 86.8%), dermatological (n = 321; 81.5%), pulmonary (n = 297; 75.4%%) and musculoskeletal (n = 172; 43.7%) involvement, although other organ manifestations of varying prevalence were also recorded. The most commonly reported mutations were "c.122T > C pMET41Thr" (n = 124), "c.121A > G pMET41Val" (n = 62) and "c.121A > C pMet41Leu" (n = 52). Most patients received glucocorticoids (n = 240; 60.9%) followed by methotrexate (n = 82; 20.8%) and IL-6 inhibitors (n = 61, 15.4%). One patient underwent splenectomy; 24 received bone marrow transplants. CONCLUSION: VEXAS syndrome is a rare disorder affecting predominantly middle-aged men. This is the first systematic review to capture clinical manifestations, genetics and treatment of reported cases. Further studies are needed to optimise treatment and subsequently reduce morbidity and mortality.