Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Asunto de la revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Oral Health ; 24(1): 498, 2024 Apr 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38678246

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Orthodontic treatment presents challenges with plaque accumulation around brackets, archwires, and elastics, leading to retained plaque and gingival inflammation. Conventional toothbrushing may not be enough, requiring additional oral hygiene aids like interproximal brushes, dental flosses, and water flossers. Limited research exists on comparing water flossing and interdental flossing in orthodontic patients. Therefore, this study aims to assess their effectiveness in maintaining oral hygiene during active orthodontic treatment. METHODS: A single-blind, randomized, parallel clinical study recruited orthodontic patients with full-mouth brackets and archwires. Thirty participants were randomly assigned to either water jet flossing or interdental flossing groups. All participants were instructed to brush twice daily with a provided toothbrush and toothpaste and use the assigned intervention once daily at night. Clinical measures, including the Gingival Bleeding Index (BI), Plaque Index (PI), and Gingival Index (GI), were recorded at baseline and day 14. Descriptive statistics and statistical tests were performed using SPSS software. RESULTS: The water jet flossing group demonstrated a slightly higher, albeit non-significant, benefit in plaque removal (median difference of 6.79%%, P = 0.279) and bleeding reduction (median difference of 5.21%%, P = 0.172) compared to the interdental flossing group after two weeks. Both groups showed significant reductions in gingival bleeding index and plaque index from baseline to the 2-week follow-up. The interdental flossing group had median mean percentage differences of 16.13%% (plaque index) and 23.57% (gingival bleeding index), while the water jet flossing group had median percentage differences of 21.87% (plaque index) and 32.29% (gingival bleeding index). No significant changes in gingival index grades were observed in either group. CONCLUSION: Both water jet flossing and interdental flossing were effective in reducing plaque accumulation and gingival bleeding among orthodontic patients. While no significant differences were found between the two methods, water jet flossing showed a potential advantage. Further research is needed to validate its effectiveness, assess long-term impact, and understand its benefits for orthodontic patients.


Asunto(s)
Dispositivos para el Autocuidado Bucal , Índice de Placa Dental , Higiene Bucal , Índice Periodontal , Humanos , Femenino , Método Simple Ciego , Higiene Bucal/instrumentación , Higiene Bucal/métodos , Masculino , Adolescente , Aparatos Ortodóncicos Fijos , Placa Dental , Adulto Joven , Cepillado Dental/instrumentación , Agua , Adulto
2.
Cureus ; 15(12): e51202, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38155978

RESUMEN

Morphea is a subtype of scleroderma that does not involve Raynaud's phenomenon or internal organ involvement. It is a connective tissue disease that features the excessive deposition of collagen in the dermis and subcutaneous tissue, leading to a thickening of the dermis and subcutaneous tissue, eventually forming a scar-like lesion. We represent a 19-year-old male Saudi patient displaying a white patch on the marginal gingiva of tooth #21 and multiple yellowish papules on the outer surface of the lip. Both teeth #21 and #22 have experienced recession and bone loss. The patient's clinical history and histopathology revealed characteristic features of localized scleroderma. A treatment was proposed involving immunosuppressants, methotrexate, and pimecrolimus cream along with topical corticosteroids and excimer laser therapy (308 nm). The patient followed the treatment plan for a full month and the white patch quickly improved for the patient. Afterward, the patient has been taking only methotrexate with a significant but gradual improvement. In this paper, we discuss the differential diagnosis to be considered and present an unusual occurrence of localized scleroderma in the oral cavity.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA