No gender-associated differences of cyclosporine pharmacokinetics in stable renal transplant patients treated with diltiazem.

Cytochrome-P450 enzymes metabolize cyclosporine both in the liver and in the intestinal wall. Diltiazem, by competitive inhibition of these enzymes, may increase the absorption and the bioavailability of cyclosporine. Some evidence points to a higher activity of some specific enzymes in women, such as CYP3A, that may influence differences in cyclosporine pharmacokinetics. We examined possible gender-associated differences in pharmacokinetic profiles of cyclosporine in 19 stable renal transplant recipients cotreated with diltiazem. Ten women and nine men, chronically using diltiazem associated with cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisone were randomly assigned to an 8-week period of continued controlled treatment with diltiazem (10 patients) or a wash-out period discontinuing diltiazem (nine patients). At the end of this period, the time-concentration curves of cyclosporine in the first 4 hours were performed after a single dose of cyclosporine. Thereafter, a cross-over between groups was performed, and time-concentration curves repeated. A specific RIA was used to measure cyclosporine concentrations. Comparisons between male and female patients in doses of cyclosporine and other pharmacokinetics parameters (C(0), C(2), AUC(0-4)), with or without diltiazem, did not show any difference related to gender. The association of diltiazem allowed a similar degree of reduction in Neoral dosage in male and female patients (21%). No changes in serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, potassium, uric acid, or blood pressure, or other adverse event were observed during the study. In these groups of patients, gender was not an important factor to be considered when diltiazem is added to cyclosporine therapy.

Correlation Between C2 and AUC(0-4) in Renal Transplant Patients Treated With Diltiazem.

BACKGROUND: The area-under-the-curve (AUC) of cyclosporine (CsA) reflects exposure to the drug, but this monitoring strategy is time-consuming and not cost-effective. Recently, it has been suggested that the concentration at 2 hours after dosing (C2) shows the best correlation with AUC. The C2 has been replacing the trough measurement (C0) to monitor CsA therapy, but in patients receiving diltiazem there is not much information about this issue. We investigated the correlations between C2 and C0 with absorption AUC over the first 4 hours (AUC(0-4)) in renal stable transplant patients receiving CsA therapy with or without diltiazem. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ten patients (five men) of ages 23 to 68 years and 6 to 84 months after transplantation, were randomly assigned to an 8-week initial period of either diltiazem washout or controlled treatment with diltiazem. Time-concentration curves of cyclosporine were performed at the end of this period using a specific RIA measurement of blood samples. Thereafter, a crossover of the groups was performed and after another 8 weeks, a second curve was obtained. Drugs that change the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine or diltiazem were not allowed. RESULTS: The cyclosporine daily dose was lower with diltiazem (173 +/- 4 mg vs 213 +/- 4 mg, P = .002), but despite a dose reduction of only 19% +/- 1.5%, there was a trend to a larger AUC/dose (28 +/- 5 ng x h/mL x mg vs 17 +/- 2 ng x h/mL x mg, P = .1) and a trend to an increased C2 when treatment included diltiazem (1035 +/- 156 ng/mL vs 652 +/- 126 ng/mL, P = NS). Moreover, we confirmed that C2 showed the best correlation with AUC(0-4), (r = 0.7, P = .04), a correlation that improved with diltiazem (r = 0.9, P < .002). CONCLUSION: C2 is the point that correlates best with AUC(0-4) with or without diltiazem. C2 in the presence of diltiazem was associated with a stronger, more significant correlation with AUC(0-4).