AI-based cluster analysis enables outcomes prediction among patients with increased LVM.

Background: The traditional classification of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), which relies on left ventricular geometry, fails to correlate with outcomes among patients with increased LV mass (LVM). Objectives: To identify unique clinical phenotypes of increased LVM patients using unsupervised cluster analysis, and to explore their association with clinical outcomes. Methods: Among the UK Biobank participants, increased LVM was defined as LVM index ≥72 g/m2 for men, and LVM index ≥55 g/m2 for women. Baseline demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected from the database. Using Ward's minimum variance method, patients were clustered based on 27 variables. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality with heart failure (HF) admissions, ventricular arrhythmia, and atrial fibrillation (AF). Cox proportional hazard model and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were applied. Results: Increased LVM was found in 4,255 individuals, with an average age of 64 ± 7 years. Of these patients, 2,447 (58%) were women. Through cluster analysis, four distinct subgroups were identified. Over a median follow-up period of 5 years (IQR: 4-6), 100 patients (2%) died, 118 (2.8%) were admissioned due to HF, 29 (0.7%) were admissioned due to VA, and 208 (5%) were admissioned due to AF. Univariate Cox analysis demonstrated significantly elevated risks of major events for patients in the 2nd (HR = 1.6; 95% CI 1.2-2.16; p < .001), 3rd (HR = 2.04; 95% CI 1.49-2.78; p < .001), and 4th (HR = 2.64; 95% CI 1.92-3.62; p < .001) clusters compared to the 1st cluster. Further exploration of each cluster revealed unique clinical phenotypes: Cluster 2 comprised mostly overweight women with a high prevalence of chronic lung disease; Cluster 3 consisted mostly of men with a heightened burden of comorbidities; and Cluster 4, mostly men, exhibited the most abnormal cardiac measures. Conclusions: Unsupervised cluster analysis identified four outcomes-correlated clusters among patients with increased LVM. This phenotypic classification holds promise in offering valuable insights regarding clinical course and outcomes of patients with increased LVM.

Ventricular Arrhythmias in Acute Heart Failure. A Clinical Consensus Statement of the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care Association (ACVC), the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC.

Patients presenting with or alerting emergency networks due to acute heart failure (AHF) form a diverse group with a plethora of symptoms, risks, comorbidities, and aetiologies. During AHF, there is an increased risk of destabilizing the functional substrate and modulatory adding to the risk of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) already created by the structural substrate. New VAs during AHF have previously identified patients with higher intra-hospital and 60-day morbidity and mortality. Risk stratification and criteria/best time point for coronary intervention and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation, however, are still controversial topics in this difficult clinical setting. The characteristics and logistics of prehospital emergency medicine, as well as the density of centers capable of treating AHF and VAs, differ massively throughout Europe. Scientific guidelines provide clear recommendations for the management of arrhythmias in chronic HF patients. However, the incidence, significance, and management of arrhythmias in patients with AHF have been less studied. This consensus paper aimed to address the identification and treatment of VAs that complicate the course of patients who have AHF, including cardiogenic shock.

Repurposing of glatiramer acetate to treat cardiac ischemia in rodent models.

Myocardial injury may ultimately lead to adverse ventricular remodeling and development of heart failure (HF), which is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Given the slow pace and substantial costs of developing new therapeutics, drug repurposing is an attractive alternative. Studies of many organs, including the heart, highlight the importance of the immune system in modulating injury and repair outcomes. Glatiramer acetate (GA) is an immunomodulatory drug prescribed for patients with multiple sclerosis. Here, we report that short-term GA treatment improves cardiac function and reduces scar area in a mouse model of acute myocardial infarction and a rat model of ischemic HF. We provide mechanistic evidence indicating that, in addition to its immunomodulatory functions, GA exerts beneficial pleiotropic effects, including cardiomyocyte protection and enhanced angiogenesis. Overall, these findings highlight the potential repurposing of GA as a future therapy for a myriad of heart diseases.

Human Gut Microbiota in Cardiovascular Disease.

The gut ecosystem, termed microbiota, is composed of bacteria, archaea, viruses, protozoa, and fungi and is estimated to outnumber human cells. Microbiota can affect the host by multiple mechanisms, including the synthesis of metabolites and toxins, modulating inflammation and interaction with other organisms. Advances in understanding commensal organisms' effect on human conditions have also elucidated the importance of this community for cardiovascular disease (CVD). This effect is driven by both direct CV effects and conditions known to increase CV risk, such as obesity, diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension, and renal and liver diseases. Cardioactive metabolites, such as trimethylamine N -oxide (TMAO), short-chain fatty acids (SCFA), lipopolysaccharides, bile acids, and uremic toxins, can affect atherosclerosis, platelet activation, and inflammation, resulting in increased CV incidence. Interestingly, this interaction is bidirectional with microbiota affected by multiple host conditions including diet, bile acid secretion, and multiple diseases affecting the gut barrier. This interdependence makes manipulating microbiota an attractive option to reduce CV risk. Indeed, evolving data suggest that the benefits observed from low red meat and Mediterranean diet consumption can be explained, at least partially, by the changes that these diets may have on the gut microbiota. In this article, we depict the current epidemiological and mechanistic understanding of the role of microbiota and CVD. Finally, we discuss the potential therapeutic approaches aimed at manipulating gut microbiota to improve CV outcomes. © 2024 American Physiological Society. Compr Physiol 14:5449-5490, 2024.

Beyond the Initial Insult: Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of Heart Failure with Improved Ejection Fraction.

INTRODUCTION: Heart failure with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF) is a recently defined subtype of HF, characterized by an increase in ejection fraction (EF) after a prior diagnosis of reduced EF. There are limited data on the characteristics and outcome of this patient subset. The study aimed to investigate the clinical profile and prognosis of this patient group. METHODS: HFimpEF patients from a large echocardiography database with comprehensive clinical and outcome data were evaluated for clinical characteristics and outcomes including mortality and cardiovascular hospitalizations. HFimpEF was defined as prior HF diagnosis with EF ≤40% followed by an EF increase of ≥10% to >40%. RESULTS: The study included 2,883 patients with an EF ≤40%. 27% (777) fulfilled criteria of HFimpEF. Non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, female sex, and smaller left ventricular dimensions were associated with EF improvement. Median follow-up duration was 1,346 days. Patients with HFimpEF had a significantly improved prognosis compared to those without EF improvement. Patients with a significant improvement in the EF (≥50%) experienced a 30% lower mortality rate (HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.57-0.86, p < 0.001) and a decreased risk of cardiovascular hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS: HFimpEF is a distinct clinical entity observed in 27% of patients with initially reduced EF and conveys a better prognosis. However, even with improvement, EF in most patients does not fully recover, and clinical events can still occur.

Left Ventricular Function, Congestion, and Effect of Empagliflozin on Heart Failure Risk After Myocardial Infarction.

BACKGROUND: Empagliflozin reduces the risk of heart failure (HF) hospitalizations but not all-cause mortality when started within 14 days of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the association of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), congestion, or both, with outcomes and the impact of empagliflozin in reducing HF risk post-AMI. METHODS: In the EMPACT-MI (Trial to Evaluate the Effect of Empagliflozin on Hospitalization for Heart Failure and Mortality in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial, patients were randomized within 14 days of an AMI complicated by either newly reduced LVEF<45%, congestion, or both, to empagliflozin (10 mg daily) or placebo and were followed up for a median of 17.9 months. RESULTS: Among 6,522 patients, the mean baseline LVEF was 41 ± 9%; 2,648 patients (40.6%) presented with LVEF <45% alone, 1,483 (22.7%) presented with congestion alone, and 2,181 (33.4%) presented with both. Among patients in the placebo arm of the trial, multivariable adjusted risk for each 10-point reduction in LVEF included all-cause death or HF hospitalization (HR: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.31-1.69; P < 0.0001), first HF hospitalization (HR: 1.64; 95% CI: 1.37-1.96; P < 0.0001), and total HF hospitalizations (rate ratio [RR]: 1.89; 95% CI: 1.51-2.36; P < 0.0001). The presence of congestion was also associated with a significantly higher risk for each of these outcomes (HR: 1.52, 1.94, and RR: 2.03, respectively). Empagliflozin reduced the risk for first (HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.60-0.98) and total (RR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.50-0.89) HF hospitalizations, irrespective of LVEF or congestion, or both. The safety profile of empagliflozin was consistent across baseline LVEF and irrespective of congestion status. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AMI, the severity of left ventricular dysfunction and the presence of congestion was associated with worse outcomes. Empagliflozin reduced first and total HF hospitalizations across the range of LVEF with and without congestion. (Trial to Evaluate the Effect of Empagliflozin on Hospitalization for Heart Failure and Mortality in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction [EMPACT-MI]; NCT04509674).

Empagliflozin after Acute Myocardial Infarction.

BACKGROUND: Empagliflozin improves cardiovascular outcomes in patients with heart failure, patients with type 2 diabetes who are at high cardiovascular risk, and patients with chronic kidney disease. The safety and efficacy of empagliflozin in patients who have had acute myocardial infarction are unknown. METHODS: In this event-driven, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, patients who had been hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction and were at risk for heart failure to receive empagliflozin at a dose of 10 mg daily or placebo in addition to standard care within 14 days after admission. The primary end point was a composite of hospitalization for heart failure or death from any cause as assessed in a time-to-first-event analysis. RESULTS: A total of 3260 patients were assigned to receive empagliflozin and 3262 to receive placebo. During a median follow-up of 17.9 months, a first hospitalization for heart failure or death from any cause occurred in 267 patients (8.2%) in the empagliflozin group and in 298 patients (9.1%) in the placebo group, with incidence rates of 5.9 and 6.6 events, respectively, per 100 patient-years (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76 to 1.06; P = 0.21). With respect to the individual components of the primary end point, a first hospitalization for heart failure occurred in 118 patients (3.6%) in the empagliflozin group and in 153 patients (4.7%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.98), and death from any cause occurred in 169 (5.2%) and 178 (5.5%), respectively (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.19). Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of empagliflozin and were similar in the two trial groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients at increased risk for heart failure after acute myocardial infarction, treatment with empagliflozin did not lead to a significantly lower risk of a first hospitalization for heart failure or death from any cause than placebo. (Funded by Boehringer Ingelheim and Eli Lilly; EMPACT-MI ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04509674.).

Effect of Empagliflozin on Heart Failure Outcomes After Acute Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the EMPACT-MI Trial.

BACKGROUND: Empagliflozin reduces the risk of heart failure (HF) events in patients with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk, chronic kidney disease, or prevalent HF irrespective of ejection fraction. Whereas the EMPACT-MI trial (Effect of Empagliflozin on Hospitalization for Heart Failure and Mortality in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction) showed that empagliflozin does not reduce the risk of the composite of hospitalization for HF and all-cause death, the effect of empagliflozin on first and recurrent HF events after myocardial infarction is unknown. METHODS: EMPACT-MI was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, event-driven trial that randomized 6522 patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction at risk for HF on the basis of newly developed left ventricular ejection fraction of <45% or signs or symptoms of congestion to receive empagliflozin 10 mg daily or placebo within 14 days of admission. In prespecified secondary analyses, treatment groups were analyzed for HF outcomes. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 17.9 months, the risk for first HF hospitalization and total HF hospitalizations was significantly lower in the empagliflozin compared with the placebo group (118 [3.6%] versus 153 [4.7%] patients with events; hazard ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.60, 0.98]; P=0.031, for first HF hospitalization; 148 versus 207 events; rate ratio, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.51, 0.89]; P=0.006, for total HF hospitalizations). Subgroup analysis showed consistency of empagliflozin benefit across clinically relevant patient subgroups for first and total HF hospitalizations. The need for new use of diuretics, renin-angiotensin modulators, or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists after discharge was less in patients randomized to empagliflozin versus placebo (all P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Empagliflozin reduced the risk of HF in patients with left ventricular dysfunction or congestion after acute myocardial infarction. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04509674.

Endomyocardial biopsy in clinical practice: the diagnostic yield and insights from a 5-year single-center experience.

OBJECTIVES: Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is a diagnostic tool for evaluating various cardiac conditions, such as myocarditis and myocardial infiltrative diseases. It is also the gold standard screening technique for detecting allograft rejection after heart transplantation. Despite advances in noninvasive imaging modalities for myocardial tissue characterization, EMB is still necessary for making a definitive diagnosis and determining treatment for certain conditions. Herein, we report our recent experience using EMB and its diagnostic yield. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively reviewed EMBs performed at our institution from March 2018 through March 2023. Clinical data, including patient characteristics, indication and diagnostic yield of EMB, and procedure-related complications, were collected. Histopathological findings of the biopsies were recorded and classified based on the degree to which they matched the clinical diagnosis and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) findings. A total of 212 EMBs obtained in 178 consecutive patients were retrospectively analyzed, with 42 biopsies performed for allograft rejection surveillance (10 patients) and the remaining performed for presumptive diagnosis of acute myocarditis or unexplained cardiomyopathy. Among the non-heart transplant cases, 54.7% of EMBs provided a clear diagnosis. The most common diagnosis was myocarditis (69%), followed by cardiac amyloidosis (CA) (26%). EMB was also helpful in detecting several rare cardiac conditions, such as eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA), Fabry disease, and cardiac sarcoidosis. In a cohort of 101 patients who underwent both CMR and EMB, the results were concordant in 66% of cases. However, in 24.7% of patients, EMB was able to identify pathological conditions where CMR results were inconclusive, highlighting its complementary role in determining an accurate diagnosis. No complications were reported in any of the 212 EMBs performed. CONCLUSIONS: With advances in cardiac imaging modalities, EMB is not routinely indicated for the diagnosis of cardiomyopathy. However, EMB is still an important tool for diagnosing specific cardiac diseases and could be crucial for confirming the diagnosis. EMB is generally safe if performed at experienced centers.

Physician perceptions, attitudes, and strategies towards implementing guideline-directed medical therapy in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. A survey of the Heart Failure Association of the ESC and the ESC Council for Cardiology Practice.

AIMS: Recent guidelines recommend four core drug classes (renin-angiotensin system inhibitor/angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor [RASi/ARNi], beta-blocker, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist [MRA], and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor [SGLT2i]) for the pharmacological management of heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We assessed physicians' perceived (i) comfort with implementing the recent HFrEF guideline recommendations; (ii) status of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) implementation; (iii) use of different GDMT sequencing strategies; and (iv) barriers and strategies for achieving implementation. METHODS AND RESULTS: A 26-question survey was disseminated via bulletin, e-mail and social channels directed to physicians with an interest in HF. Of 432 respondents representing 91 countries, 36% were female, 52% were aged <50 years, and 90% mainly practiced in cardiology (30% HF). Overall comfort with implementing quadruple therapy was high (87%). Only 12% estimated that >90% of patients with HFrEF without contraindications received quadruple therapy. The time required to initiate quadruple therapy was estimated at 1-2 weeks by 34% of respondents, 1 month by 36%, 3 months by 24%, and ≥6 months by 6%. The average respondent favoured traditional drug sequencing strategies (RASi/ARNi with/followed by beta-blocker, and then MRA with/followed by SGLT2i) over simultaneous initiation or SGLT2i-first sequences. The most frequently perceived clinical barriers to implementation were hypotension (70%), creatinine increase (47%), hyperkalaemia (45%) and patient adherence (42%). CONCLUSIONS: Although comfort with implementing all four core drug classes in patients with HFrEF was high among physicians, a majority estimated implementation of GDMT in HFrEF to be low. We identified several important perceived clinical and non-clinical barriers that can be targeted to improve implementation.

Sex difference and outcome trends following surgical aortic valve replacement from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) Database.

BACKGROUND: Based on worldwide registries, approximately 50% of patients who underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) via surgical aortic valve replacement are females. Although AVR procedures have improved greatly in recent years, differences in outcome including mortality between sexes remain. We aimed to investigate the trends in SAVR outcomes in females versus males. METHODS: Using the 2011-2017 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, we identified hospitalizations for patients with diagnosis of aortic stenosis during which SAVR was performed. Patients' sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, procedure complications, and mortality were analyzed. Piecewise regression analyses were performed to assess temporal trends in SAVR utilization in females versus males. Multivariable analyses were performed to identify predictors of in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: A total of 392,087 hospitalizations for SAVR across the USA were analyzed. Utilization of SAVR in both sex patients decreased significantly during the years 2011-2017. Males compared to females had significantly higher rates of hyperlipidemia, chronic renal disease, peripheral artery disease, coronary artery disease and tended to be smokers. Differences in mortality rates among sexes were observed for SAVR procedures. Women had higher in-hospital mortality with 3.7% compared to men with 2.5% (OR 1.38 [95% CI 1.33-1.43, P<0.001]). In a multivariable regression model analysis adjusted for potential confounders, women had higher mortality risk with odd ratio (OR 1.38 [95% CI 1.33-1.43], P<0.001). Women had significantly higher rates of vascular complications (5.1% compared to men with 4.6%, P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of SAVR showed a downward trend during the study period. Higher in-hospital mortality was recorded in females compared to males.

Integration of implantable device therapy in patients with heart failure. A clinical consensus statement from the Heart Failure Association (HFA) and European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).

Implantable devices form an integral part of the management of patients with heart failure (HF) and provide adjunctive therapies in addition to cornerstone drug treatment. Although the number of these devices is growing, only few are supported by robust evidence. Current devices aim to improve haemodynamics, improve reverse remodelling, or provide electrical therapy. A number of these devices have guideline recommendations and some have been shown to improve outcomes such as cardiac resynchronization therapy, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and long-term mechanical support. For others, more evidence is still needed before large-scale implementation can be strongly advised. Of note, devices and drugs can work synergistically in HF as improved disease control with devices can allow for further optimization of drug therapy. Therefore, some devices might already be considered early in the disease trajectory of HF patients, while others might only be reserved for advanced HF. As such, device therapy should be integrated into HF care programmes. Unfortunately, implementation of devices, including those with the greatest evidence, in clinical care pathways is still suboptimal. This clinical consensus document of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) and European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) describes the physiological rationale behind device-provided therapy and also device-guided management, offers an overview of current implantable device options recommended by the guidelines and proposes a new integrated model of device therapy as a part of HF care.

Diurnal cardio-respiratory changes in ambulatory individuals deciphered using a multi-parameter wearable device.

Background: Recent technological developments enable big data-driven insights on diurnal changes. This study aimed to describe the trajectory of multiple and advanced parameters using a medical-grade wearable remote patient monitor. Methods: Parameters were monitored for 24 h in 256 ambulatory participants who kept living their normal life. Parameters included heart rate, blood pressure, stroke volume, cardiac index, systemic vascular resistance, blood oxygen saturation, and respiratory rate. Diurnal variations were evaluated, and analyses were stratified based on sex, age, and body mass index. Results: All parameters showed diurnal changes (p < 0.001). Females demonstrated higher heart rate and cardiac index with lower systemic vascular resistance. Obese participants had a higher blood pressure, and lower stroke volume and cardiac index. Systemic vascular resistance was higher among the elderly. Diurnal changes corresponded with awake-sleep hours and differed between sex, age, and body mass index groups. Conclusion: Wearable monitoring platforms could decipher hemodynamic changes in subgroups of individuals, and might help with efforts to provide personalized medicine, pre-symptomatic diagnosis and prevention, and drug development.

Trends in Atrial Fibrillation Management-Results from a National Multi-Center Urgent Care Network Registry.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common diagnosis in patients presenting to urgent care centers (UCCs), yet there is scant research regarding treatment in these centers. While some of these patients are managed within UCCs, some are referred for further care in an emergency department (ED). OBJECTIVES: We aimed to identify the rate of patients referred to an ED and define predictors for this outcome. We analyzed the rates of AF diagnosis and hospital referral over the years. Finally, we described trends in patient anticoagulation (AC) medication use. METHODS: This retrospective study included 5873 visits of patients over age 18 visiting the TEREM UCC network with a diagnosis of AF over 11 years. Multivariate analysis was used to identify predictors for ED referral. RESULTS: In a multivariate model, predictors of referral to an ED included vascular disease (OR 1.88 (95% CI 1.43-2.45), p < 0.001), evening or night shifts (OR 1.31 (95% CI 1.11-1.55), p < 0.001; OR 1.68 (95% CI 1.32-2.15), p < 0.001; respectively), previously diagnosed AF (OR 0.31 (95% CI 0.26-0.37), p < 0.001), prior treatment with AC (OR 0.56 (95% CI 0.46-0.67), p < 0.001), beta blockers (OR 0.63 (95% CI 0.52-0.76), p < 0.001), and antiarrhythmic medication (OR 0.58 (95% CI 0.48-0.69), p < 0.001). Visits diagnosed with AF increased over the years (p = 0.030), while referrals to an ED decreased over the years (p = 0.050). The rate of novel oral anticoagulant prescriptions increased over the years. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of referral to an ED from a UCC over the years is declining but remains high. Referrals may be predicted using simple clinical variables. This knowledge may help to reduce the burden of hospitalizations.

The QRS frontal plane axis changes during left bundle branch block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is common after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and associated with a left or normal QRS axis. We aim to assess the QRS frontal plane axis shift changes during LBBB after TAVR and determine if the risk of procedure-related high degree atrioventricular block (AVB) is affected by QRS axis shift changes. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a retrospective single-center study of 720 consecutive patients who underwent TAVR, 141 (19.6%) with normal baseline QRS duration developed a new LBBB after TAVR and constituted the study group. Most patients (59.6%) were females and the mean age of the cohort was 81.2 ± 6 years. RESULTS: As compared with the baseline QRS axis before TAVR, the occurrence of LBBB was associated with a leftward QRS axis shift (by 40 ± 28.3°) in 73% of the study patients and a rightward (by 18.6 ± 19.4°) or no change in QRS axis in 25.6% and 1.4% of the study patients, respectively. A left QRS axis (-30°) was observed in 14.9% and 38.3% of the study patients before and after TAVR, respectively. The group of patients exhibiting a rightward or no QRS axis shift had a greater incidence of high degree AVB than the group of patients exhibiting a leftward QRS axis shift (18.4% vs. 6.8%, p = .056). CONCLUSION: Although post TAVR-LBBB is associated with a leftward QRS axis shift in most patients, a non-negligible proportion of patients (27%) exhibited a rightward or no QRS axis shift. The latter group tend to have a higher risk of developing high degree AVB.

Pre- and Post-transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) Serum Mean Platelet Volume Levels and All-Cause Mortality.

BACKGROUND: Among the most frequent complications following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is hemostasis imbalance that presents either as thromboembolic or bleeding. Deviations in platelet count (PC) and mean platelet volume (MPV) are markers of hemostasis imbalance. OBJECTIVES: To determine the predictive value of pre- and post-procedural PC and MPV fL 1-year all-cause mortality in patients who underwent TAVR. METHODS: In this population-based study, we included 236 TAVR patients treated at the Tzafon Medical Center between 1 June 2015 and 31 August 2018. Routine blood samples for serum PC levels and MPV fL were taken just before the TAVR and 24-hour post-TAVR. We used backward regression models to evaluate the predictive value of PC and MPV in all-cause mortality in TAVR patients. RESULTS: In this study cohort, MPV levels 24-hour post-TAVR that were greater than the cohort median of 9 fL (interquartile range 8.5-9.8) were the strongest predictor of 1-year mortality (hazard ratio 1.343, 95% confidence interval 1.059-1.703, P-value 0.015). A statistically significant relationship was seen in the unadjusted regression model as well as after the adjustment for clinical variables. CONCLUSIONS: Serum MPV levels fL 24-hour post-procedure were found to be meaningful markers in predicting 1-year all-cause mortality in patients after TAVR.

Single- Versus Dual-Chamber Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator for Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death in the United States.

Background Routine addition of an atrial lead during an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death, in patients without pacing indications, was not shown beneficial in contemporary studies. We aimed to investigate the use and safety of single- versus dual-chamber ICD implantations in these patients. Methods and Results Using the National Inpatient Sample database, we identified patients with no pacing indications who underwent primary-prevention ICD implantation in the United States between 2015 and 2019. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, as well as in-hospital complications, were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of in-hospital complications. An estimated total of 15 940 patients, underwent ICD implantation for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death during the study period, 8860 (55.6%) received a dual-chamber ICD. The mean age was 64 years, and 66% were men. In-hospital complication rates in the dual-chamber ICD and single-chamber ICD group were 12.8% and 10.7%, respectively (P<0.001), driven by increased rates of pneumothorax/hemothorax (4.6% versus 3.4%; P<0.001) and lead dislodgement (3.6% versus 2.3%; P<0.001) in the dual-chamber ICD group. Multivariable analyses confirmed atrial lead addition as an independent predictor for "any complications" (odds ratio [OR], 1.1 [95% CI, 1.0-1.2]), for pneumo/hemothorax (odds ratio, 1.1 [95% CI, 1.0-1.4]), and for lead dislodgement (odds ratio, 1.3 [95% CI, 1.1-1.6]). Conclusions Despite lack of evidence for clinical benefit, dual-chamber ICDs are implanted for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death in a majority of patients who do not have pacing indication. This practice is associated with increased risk of periprocedural complications. Avoidance of routine implantation of atrial leads will likely improve safety outcomes.