MR Uniformity Ratio Estimates to Evaluate Ventricular Mechanical Dyssynchrony and Prognosis After ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

BACKGROUND: The impact of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony (LVMD) on the long-term prognosis of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is unclear. HYPOTHESIS: MR uniformity ratio estimates (URE) can detect LVMD and assess STEMI prognosis. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective analysis of a prospective multicenter registry (EARLY-MYO trial, NCT03768453). POPULATION: Overall, 450 patients (50 females) with first-time STEMI were analyzed, as well as 40 participants without cardiovascular disease as controls. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3.0-T, balanced steady-state free precession cine and late gadolinium enhancement imaging. ASSESSMENT: MRI data were acquired within 1 week of symptom onset. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), including cardiovascular death, nonfatal re-infarction, hospitalization for heart failure, and stroke, were the primary clinical outcomes. LVMD was represented by circumferential URE (CURE) and radial URE (RURE) calculated using strain measurements. The patients were grouped according to clinical outcomes or URE values. Patients' clinical characteristics and MR indicators were compared. STATISTICAL TESTS: The Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis with area under the curve, Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox regression, logistic regression, intraclass correlation coefficient, c-index, and integrated discrimination improvement were used. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: CURE and RURE were significantly lower in patients with STEMI than in controls. The median follow-up was 60.5 months. Patients with both lower CURE and RURE values experienced a significantly higher incidence of MACEs by 3.525-fold. Both CURE and RURE were independent risk factors for MACEs. The addition of UREs improved diagnostic efficacy and risk stratification based on infarct size and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The indicators associated with LVMD included male sex, serum biomarkers (peak creatine phosphokinase and cardiac troponin I), infarct size, and LVEF. DATA CONCLUSION: CURE and RURE may be useful to evaluate long-term prognosis after STEMI. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Peak early diastolic strain rate improves prediction of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic role of diastolic dysfunction measured by the circumferential peak early diastolic strain rate (PEDSR) on ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is not completely established. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of diastolic function by measuring PEDSR within 1 week after STEMI. METHODS: The cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) pictures of 420 subjects from a clinical registry study (NCT03768453) were analyzed and the composite major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) were followed up. RESULTS: The PEDSR of patients was significantly lower compared with that of control subjects (P < 0.001). Within the median follow-up period of 52 months, PEDSR of patients who experienced MACEs deceased more significantly than that of patients without MACEs (P < 0.001). After adjusting with clinical or CMR indexes, per 0.1/s reduction of PEDSR increased the risks of MACEs to 1.402 or 1.376 fold and the risk of left ventricular (LV) remodeling to 1.503 or 1.369 fold. When PEDSR divided by best cutoff point, significantly higher risk of MACEs (P < 0.001) and more remarkable LV remodeling (P < 0.001) occurred in patients with PEDSR ≤ 0.485/s. Moreover, when adding the PEDSR to the conventional prognostic factors such as LV ejection fraction and infarction size, better prognostic risk classification models were created. Finally, aging, tobacco use, remarkable LV remodeling, and a low LV ejection fraction were factors related with the reduction of PEDSR. CONCLUSIONS: Diastolic dysfunction has an important prognostic effect on patients with STEMI. Measurement of the PEDSR in the acute phase could serve as an effective index to predict the long-term risk of MACEs and cardiac remodeling.

Comparison of direct stenting with conventional strategy on myocardial impairments in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a cardiac magnetic resonance imaging study.

Direct stenting (DS) without pre-dilatation of the culprit lesion might improve myocardial perfusion and prognosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI); however, some studies report conflicting results. We investigated whether DS provides incremental myocardial benefits over conventional stenting (CS) in STEMI patients based on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) measures. Reperfused patients who underwent CMR examinations within 1 week of STEMI onset were selected from a multicenter CMR registry of STEMI (NCT: 03768453). Patients were stratified into either a DS or CS group. Each group comprised 137 patients after 1:1 propensity score matching. Major adverse events (MACEs), including death, myocardial re-infarction, re-admission for heart failure, and stroke were noted during a median period of 44 months (interquartile range 32-58 months). DS was associated with larger (p = 0.007) and shorter (p = 0.005) stent sizes than CS. DS and CS achieved comparable angiographic TIMI-3 flow grades (p = 0.86) and myocardial blush grades (p = 0.70). There were no group differences regarding the incidence of CMR manifestations of microvascular dysfunction, including microvascular obstruction (MVO) (p = 0.89) and intramyocardial hemorrhage (p = 0.47), the extent of MVO (p = 0.21), infarction size (p = 0.83), or left ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.57). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed similar risks of MACEs (log rank p = 0.909), which occurred in 23.4% of DS and 26.3% of CS patients (p = 0.576). DS did not show any incremental benefits over CS on myocardial impairments as evaluated using CMR.Clinical Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT: 03768453.