Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Asunto de la revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0304477, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38820301

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Health personnel (HP) are on the frontlines during response to public health emergencies like COVID-19. This risk of exposure suggests the need for safety in responding to any pandemic. Therefore, to ascertain the rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection and immunity, and their determinants amongst HP become relevant. METHODS: A cross sectional health facility-based study was carried-out amongst HP in the Centre Region of Cameroon from 1st February to 30th June 2021. Characteristics and access to preventive tools were collected using face-to-face administered questionnaire. Nasopharyngeal swabs and whole blood were collected for PCR, IgG and IgM testing respectively. STATA version 17 software was used for data analysis. Determinants of COVID-19 infection were explored by estimating crude and adjusted Odd Ratio. RESULTS: Out of 510 HP reached, 458 were enrolled with mean age of 35 (±10) years. Thirty-four (7.4%) were PCR-positive to SARS-CoV-2 with 73.5% being clinicians versus 9 (26.4%) non-clinicians (p = 0.05). Sero-positivity to SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM was 40.2% (184/458), with 84.2% being clinicians versus 29 (15.8%) non-clinicians (p = 0.733). Amongst the 34 HP with PCR-positivity, 16 (47%) had no antibodies, while, 15 (44%) were IgG only. An estimate of HP (43.7%) had at least an evidence of PCR, IgG or IgM contact to COVID-19. Determinants of PCR-positivity was being clinical staff (AOR = 0.29, P = 0.039); and that of IgG/IgM were being non clinical staff (AOR = 0.41, p = 0.018) and regular use of face masks (AOR = 0.44, p = 0.001). HP trained on IPC (24%) were mainly from peripheral level (74.7%, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Active infections were within the range of pandemic control (<10%). However, around two-fifths of participants have had contact with the virus, indicating that HP remains a population at risk of COVID-19 and other similarly-transmitted epidemic prone diseases, and also an important source of transmission. There is need of vaccine to achieve protectiveness, and optimal response also requires capacity building to improve the health system when challenged by a future pandemic.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales , COVID-19 , Personal de Salud , Salud Pública , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/virología , Camerún/epidemiología , Masculino , Adulto , Femenino , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Estudios Transversales , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Brotes de Enfermedades , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Inmunoglobulina G/inmunología , Inmunoglobulina M/sangre
2.
Ann Glob Health ; 89(1): 57, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37692379

RESUMEN

It is a prevalent misconception that healthcare professionals are specialists and thus can effectively manage their health. This is probably true, but given recent pandemics and the rise in violence in medical settings, one is compelled to question whether their health and safety are sufficient for a robust healthcare system. This is important because protecting and promoting the health, safety, and well-being of health workers will improve the quality of patient care and increase the resilience of health services in the face of outbreaks and public health emergencies. We thus strive to answer this question and suggest potential remedies to this growing public health issue.


Asunto(s)
Brotes de Enfermedades , Programas de Gobierno , Humanos , Personal de Salud , Fuerza Laboral en Salud , Asistencia Médica
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA