Electronic Health Record and Semantic Issues Using Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources: Systematic Mapping Review.

BACKGROUND: The increasing use of electronic health records and the Internet of Things has led to interoperability issues at different levels (structural and semantic). Standards are important not only for successfully exchanging data but also for appropriately interpreting them (semantic interoperability). Thus, to facilitate the semantic interoperability of data exchanged in health care, considerable resources have been deployed to improve the quality of shared clinical data by structuring and mapping them to the Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) standard. OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study are 2-fold: to inventory the studies on FHIR semantic interoperability resources and terminologies and to identify and classify the approaches and contributions proposed in these studies. METHODS: A systematic mapping review (SMR) was conducted using 10 electronic databases as sources of information for inventory and review studies published during 2012 to 2022 on the development and improvement of semantic interoperability using the FHIR standard. RESULTS: A total of 70 FHIR studies were selected and analyzed to identify FHIR resource types and terminologies from a semantic perspective. The proposed semantic approaches were classified into 6 categories, namely mapping (31/126, 24.6%), terminology services (18/126, 14.3%), resource description framework or web ontology language-based proposals (24/126, 19%), annotation proposals (18/126, 14.3%), machine learning (ML) and natural language processing (NLP) proposals (20/126, 15.9%), and ontology-based proposals (15/126, 11.9%). From 2012 to 2022, there has been continued research in 6 categories of approaches as well as in new and emerging annotations and ML and NLP proposals. This SMR also classifies the contributions of the selected studies into 5 categories: framework or architecture proposals, model proposals, technique proposals, comparison services, and tool proposals. The most frequent type of contribution is the proposal of a framework or architecture to enable semantic interoperability. CONCLUSIONS: This SMR provides a classification of the different solutions proposed to address semantic interoperability using FHIR at different levels: collecting, extracting and annotating data, modeling electronic health record data from legacy systems, and applying transformation and mapping to FHIR models and terminologies. The use of ML and NLP for unstructured data is promising and has been applied to specific use case scenarios. In addition, terminology services are needed to accelerate their use and adoption; furthermore, techniques and tools to automate annotation and ontology comparison should help reduce human interaction.

Assessing Available Open-Source PACS Options.

Medical imaging technology is producing a growing number of medical images types as well as patient-related information. The benefits of using modern medical imaging systems in healthcare are undeniable. Picture archiving and communication system (PACS) have revolutionized medical imaging practice. PACS have widely impacted the accessibility of medical images, reduced imaging costs, eliminated the physical storage of films, improved time management of radiologists, and allowed automated decision-making and diagnosis. Many health organizations and manufacturers have invested on developing commercial PACS. However, commercial PACS are not affordable for all hospitals while open-source PACS are increasingly becoming a viable option. Our research project is looking for an open-source PACS for the Donka University hospital of Guinea. Open-source PACS are currently available and are offering varying functionalities, documentation, and technical support from their developer communities. Selecting an open-source PACS is not an easy task and not only depends on the hospital requirements but also requires assessing each open-source PACS to find the best match. In this paper, the most popular open-source PACS are evaluated using a simple comparison approach based on four criteria. The result of this assessment shows that Orthanc, DCM4CHE, DCMTK, and Dicoogle are the most mature open-source PACS according to our criteria and the needs of Donka.