Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Leukemia ; 35(12): 3534-3541, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34326466

RESUMEN

Multiple myeloma (MM) patients are at higher risk for severe COVID-19. Their mRNA vaccination response against SARS-CoV-2 is unknown. Thus, we analyzed responses to mRNA vaccination against COVID-19 among these patients. Using an ELISA-based assay that detects IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, we determined serum antibody levels prior to immunization and 12-21 and 14-21 days following the first and second vaccinations, respectively, with mRNA-1273 (Moderna) or BNT162b2 (Pfizer/BioNTech) among 103 MM patients (96 and 7 with active and smoldering disease, respectively). We stratified patients into clinically relevant responders (>250 IU/mL), partial responders (50-250 IU/mL, which was above pre-COVID-19 background), and nonresponders (<50 IU/mL). Smoldering MM patients responded better than those with active disease. Only 45% of active MM patients developed an adequate response, while 22% had a partial response. Lower spike antibody levels were associated with older age, impaired renal function, low lymphocyte counts, reduced uninvolved immunoglobulin levels, > second line of treatment, and among those not in complete remission. Patients who received mRNA-1273 vaccine had higher anti-spike antibody levels than those who were vaccinated with BNT162b2. Thus, most MM patients have impaired responses to mRNA vaccination against COVID-19, and specific clinical and myeloma-related characteristics predict vaccine responsiveness.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Vacuna BNT162/administración & dosificación , COVID-19/terapia , Mieloma Múltiple/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/inmunología , Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273/inmunología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Vacuna BNT162/inmunología , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/virología , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Inmunoglobulina G/inmunología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/complicaciones , Mieloma Múltiple/virología , Vacunación
2.
J Clin Psychiatry ; 78(8): 1110-1116, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28297589

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Risk factors for postpartum depression in euthymic pregnant women with histories of major depressive disorder (MDD) were evaluated. METHODS: From April 2003 to March 2009, 343 pregnant women with a history of Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID)-diagnosed major depressive disorder were prospectively assessed from the third trimester into the postpartum period using the SCID mood module and 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS). Data from 300 subjects who completed at least 2 mood module assessments (1 within 60 days before and the other within 60 days after delivery) were analyzed for predictive associations between variables assessed in the third trimester and the development of a postpartum depression. RESULTS: The majority of women were euthymic in pregnancy by SCID criteria. Women with third trimester SCID-diagnosed depression (n = 45) versus euthymia (n = 255) had a significantly higher risk for having depression after delivery (24% vs 11%, P = .013). For pregnant euthymic women, third trimester total HDRS scores significantly predicted postpartum depression (P < .0001); specifically, scores on 3 HDRS items alone-work activities, early insomnia, and suicidality-significantly predicted postpartum depression. Antidepressant use in the third trimester in euthymic women did not confer protection against the onset of postpartum depression. CONCLUSIONS: Among women with a history of MDD who are euthymic in the third trimester, 3 HDRS items-work activities, early insomnia, and suicidality-may be useful as screening items for clinicians working with pregnant women with histories of MDD to identify a group at risk for developing postpartum depression. Additionally, in euthymic women with a history of MDD, antidepressant use in the third trimester may not reduce the risk of developing postpartum depression.


Asunto(s)
Depresión Posparto , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/diagnóstico , Tercer Trimestre del Embarazo/psicología , Adulto , Afecto , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Depresión Posparto/diagnóstico , Depresión Posparto/epidemiología , Depresión Posparto/prevención & control , Depresión Posparto/psicología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/psicología , Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevista Psicológica/métodos , Anamnesis , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Pronóstico , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/diagnóstico , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/epidemiología , Ideación Suicida , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
3.
Am J Psychiatry ; 174(3): 266-276, 2017 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28135846

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The authors compared medication-induced mood switch risk (primary outcome), as well as treatment response and side effects (secondary outcomes) with three acute-phase treatments for bipolar II depression. METHOD: In a 16-week, double-blind, multisite comparison study, 142 participants with bipolar II depression were randomly assigned to receive lithium monotherapy (N=49), sertraline monotherapy (N=45), or combination treatment with lithium and sertraline (N=48). At each visit, mood was assessed using standardized rating scales. Rates of switch were compared, as were rates of treatment response and the presence and severity of treatment-emergent side effects. RESULTS: Twenty participants (14%) experienced a switch during the study period (hypomania, N=17; severe hypomania, N=3). Switch rates did not differ among the three treatment groups, even after accounting for dropout. No patient had a manic switch or was hospitalized for a switch. Most switches occurred within the first 5 weeks of treatment. The treatment response rate for the overall sample was 62.7% (N=89), without significant differences between groups after accounting for dropout. The lithium/sertraline combination group had a significantly higher overall dropout rate than the monotherapy groups but did not have an accelerated time to response. CONCLUSIONS: Lithium monotherapy, sertraline monotherapy, and lithium/sertraline combination therapy were associated with similar switch and treatment response rates in participants with bipolar II depression. The dropout rate was higher in the lithium/sertraline combination treatment group, without any treatment acceleration advantage.


Asunto(s)
Afecto/efectos de los fármacos , Trastorno Bipolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Carbonato de Litio/uso terapéutico , Sertralina/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Trastorno Bipolar/diagnóstico , Trastorno Bipolar/psicología , Método Doble Ciego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Carbonato de Litio/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pacientes Desistentes del Tratamiento , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Riesgo , Sertralina/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA