Painful Sleep: Insomnia in Patients with Chronic Pain Syndrome and its Consequences.

Insomnia is a chronic condition that occurs a minimum of three times per week over a period of three or more subsequent months. There are multiple causes of insomnia, and even though it is considered a symptom, it can be associated with chronic illnesses. Chronic pain syndrome, which is defined as pain that persists for a period longer than 3 months, is one of several etiologies of insomnia. The prevalence of insomnia among chronic pain patients is greater in comparison with the general population (percentage or ratio). Chronic pain is common in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, spinal pain (such as chronic back pain) and fibromyalgia. The prevalence of in-somnia is also higher in cancer patients when compared to the general population. When the clinical history indicates a straightforward diagnosis of chronic pain syndrome, patients will complain of insomnia as part of their symptomatology. It is imperative to manage their underlying illness to alleviate their sleep disorder. Various medications may be used to relieve and even improve pain symptoms. Other than pharmacological interventions, non-pharmacological alternatives such as yoga, meditation, acupuncture, and psychotherapy can help improve the quality of life of these patients. The purpose of this article is to review the diagnosis and management of insomnia in chronic pain syndrome and its impact on the quality of life.

Acute Fibrinous and Organizing Pneumonia: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND Acute fibrinous organizing pneumonia (AFOP) is a rare condition of the lung that is associated with acute lung injury, and has a poor prognosis. AFOP is characterized histologically by intra-alveolar fibrin. AFOP has been described to be associated with lung infections, connective tissue disorders, drugs, toxic environmental exposure, and in lung transplantation. However, most cases of AFOP remain idiopathic, and because the condition can present with a wide variety of clinical manifestations, open lung biopsy or video-assisted thoracoscopic (VAT) lung biopsy is necessary for the diagnosis. Currently, treatments for AFOP remain under investigation. CASE REPORT A 35-year-old woman presented with a cough and dyspnea, and was initially diagnosed to have pneumonia.  Due to the progression of her symptoms and increasing respiratory failure she underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic (VAT) biopsy and was diagnosed with AFOP, 19 days following hospital admission. She was treated with mechanical ventilation, intravenous steroids, and cyclophosphamide. She required tracheostomy after 14 days of mechanical ventilation and died two weeks later. CONCLUSIONS AFOP is an uncommon clinical condition, with a poor prognosis, which often has a delay in diagnosis. Some patients benefit from steroids and immunosuppressive therapy. Currently, new treatments for AFOP are under investigation.

An Unusual Presentation of Congenital Lobar Emphysema.

Congenital lobar emphysema is an uncommon bronchopulmonary malformation characterized by lobar overinflation and accompanying alveolar septum damage that leads to compression atelectasis of the lung parenchyma and displacement of mediastinal structures, with the resultant ventilation-perfusion mismatch. We present a case of a 33-year-old lady with progressive exertional dyspnea. Chest radiograph findings lead to the suspicion of congenital lobar emphysema, which was then confirmed by a computed tomography (CT) scan. This condition is most commonly identified in newborns, with very few cases being reported in adults. Lobectomy remains the treatment of choice and in general has good outcome.

Diathermocoagulation in cutting mode and large flap dissection.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the overall complication rate associated with the use of diathermocoagulation in cutting mode for flap dissection. METHODS: Because of the high rate of complications generally associated with abdominoplasty, a large flap, abdominoplasty, or abdominal dermolipectomy model was chosen. A retrospective review was conducted regarding 647 abdominoplasty procedures, 320 of which were performed with the monopolar diathermocoagulation in the cutting mode and 327 of which were performed with a steel scalpel. The two groups were similar regarding morphologic characteristics, prescriptions, and procedures. In both cases, hemostasis was performed with punctual monopolar coagulation current. Analysis was performed regarding the frequency of major general complications (e.g., deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism), major surgical complications (e.g., acute hemorrhage), and "minor" complications (e.g., postoperative secondary collections or delayed wound healing). RESULTS: In the electrosurgery group, the incidence of noninfectious collections was significantly higher, as was the production of the drains. No difference was seen in terms of reintervention for acute hematoma, postoperative infectious collections, blood loss, hospital stay, or thromboembolic complications. Operations took significantly longer with the steel scalpel. The follow-up was significantly longer in the diathermocoagulation group. CONCLUSIONS: Monopolar diathermocoagulation has already proven its place in the general work of every surgeon. Moreover, this technique remains superior in terms of the rapidity with which surgery can be performed when dissecting large areas. Nevertheless, the higher rate of surgical complications leads to a longer follow-up period that, in part, runs counter to this advantage.