Early recanalization after tenecteplase versus alteplase: Experience in a large stroke network.

INTRODUCTION: Previously published data are conflicting regarding the ability of tenecteplase versus alteplase to produce early recanalization of an intracranial large vessel occlusion. We compared the performance of each thrombolytic in a stroke network. METHODS: We queried our prospectively collected code stroke registry for basilar, internal carotid, or proximal middle cerebral artery occlusion patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis from 11/17/2021-9/16/2023. The primary outcome was early recanalization, defined using angiographic or clinical criteria. Secondary and safety outcomes included 90-day functional independence and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. A multivariable regression analysis was performed to determine independent associations with the primary outcome. RESULTS: 233 patients, with mean age 66.9 (16.6) years and median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 15 (10-21), were included. One-hundred twenty-four of 233 (53.2 %) patients were treated with alteplase while 109/233 (46.8 %) were treated with tenecteplase. Endovascular thrombectomy was performed in 82 % of subjects. Early recanalization rates were similar between the groups (alteplase 22.6 %, tenecteplase 14.7 %; p = 0.14), as were rates of 90-day independent neurological function, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality. Patients with an internal carotid artery occlusion or with higher presenting stroke severity were less likely to achieve early recanalization. CONCLUSIONS: Tenecteplase and alteplase have similar rates of early recanalization, 90-day functional independence, and safety outcomes in large vessel occlusion patients. Occlusion site and stroke severity predict response to thrombolysis. Future studies may investigate other factors associated with a positive response to thrombolytics as expanded treatment indications are explored.

Neurological outcomes for patients meeting radiographic criteria for DEFUSE 3 and SELECT2.

BACKGROUND: The DEFUSE 3 and SELECT2 thrombectomy trials included some patients with similar radiographic profiles, although the rates of good functional outcomes differed widely between the studies. OBJECTIVE: To report neurological outcomes for patients who meet CT and CT perfusion (CTP) inclusion criteria common to both DEFUSE 3 and SELECT2. METHODS: Retrospective study of thrombectomy patients, presenting between November 2016 and December 2023 to a large health system, with Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score ≥6, core infarction 50-69 mL, mismatch ratio ≥1.8, and mismatch volume ≥15 mL. The primary outcome was 90-day modified Rankin Scale score 0-2. A logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of the primary outcome. RESULTS: 85 patients, with mean age 64.6 (16.6) years and median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 18 (15-23), were included. Thirty-eight of 85 patients (44.7%) were functionally independent at 90 days. Predictors of functional independence included age (OR=0.943, 95% CI 0.908 to 0.980; P=0.003), initial glucose (OR=0.989, 95% CI 0.978 to 1.000; P=0.044), and time last known well to skin puncture (OR=0.997, 95% CI 0.994 to 1.000; P=0.028). The area under the curve for the multivariable model predicting the primary outcome was 0.82 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.92). CONCLUSION: Nearly half of patients meeting radiographic criteria common to DEFUSE 3 and SELECT2 are functionally independent at 90 days, similar to rates reported for the treated DEFUSE 3 cohort. This might be due to their moderate core volumes and large ischemic penumbra.

Predictors of devastating functional outcome despite successful basilar thrombectomy.

BACKGROUND: Basilar thrombosis frequently leads to poor functional outcomes, even with good endovascular reperfusion. We studied factors associated with severe disability or death in basilar thrombectomy patients achieving revascularization. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed records from a health system's code stroke registry, including successful basilar thrombectomy patients from January 2017 to May 2023 who were evaluated with pretreatment computed tomography perfusion. The primary outcome was devastating functional outcome (90-day modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score 5-6). A multivariable logistic regression model was constructed to determine independent predictors of the primary outcome. The area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC) was calculated for the model distinguishing good from devastating outcome. RESULTS: Among 64 included subjects, with mean (standard deviation) age 65.6 (14.1) years and median (interquartile range) National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) 18 (5.75-24.5), the primary outcome occurred in 28 of 64 (43.8%) subjects. Presenting NIHSS (odds ratio [OR] 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.14, p = 0.02), initial glucose (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.97-1.00, p < 0.05), and proximal occlusion site (OR 7.38, 95% CI 1.84-29.60, p < 0.01) were independently associated with 90-day mRS 5-6. The AUC for the multivariable model distinguishing outcomes was 0.81 (95% CI 0.70-0.92). CONCLUSION: We have identified presenting stroke severity, lower glucose, and proximal basilar occlusion as predictors of devastating neurological outcome in successful basilar thrombectomy patients. These factors may be used in medical decision making or for patient selection in future clinical trials.

The Charlotte Large artery occlusion Endovascular therapy Outcome Score predicts independent outcome after thrombectomy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Predicting functional outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is of interest to patients and families as they navigate hospital and post-acute care decision-making. We evaluated the prognostic ability of several scales to predict good neurological function after EVT. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed records from a health system's code stroke registry, including consecutive successful thrombectomy patients from August 2020 to February 2023 presenting with an anterior circulation large vessel occlusion who were evaluated with pre-EVT CT perfusion. Primary and secondary outcomes were 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores 0-2 and 0-1, respectively. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate the ability of each scale to predict the outcomes. Scales were compared by calculating the area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: A total of 465 patients (mean age 68.1 [±14.9] years, median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] 16 [11-21]) met inclusion criteria. In the logistic regression, the Charlotte Large artery occlusion Endovascular therapy Outcome Score (CLEOS), Totaled Health Risks in Vascular Events, Houston Intra-Arterial Therapy-2, Pittsburgh Response to Endovascular therapy, and Stroke Prognostication using Age and NIHSS were significant in predicting the primary and secondary outcomes. CLEOS was superior to all other scales in predicting 90-day mRS 0-2 (AUC .75, 95% confidence interval [CI] .70-.80) and mRS 0-1 (AUC .74, 95% CI .69-.78). Twenty of 22 patients (90.9%) with CLEOS <315 had 90-day mRS 0-2. CONCLUSIONS: CLEOS predicts independent and excellent neurological function after anterior circulation EVT.

Predicting severe disability or death in endovascular thrombectomy with large computed tomography perfusion core infarction and limited penumbra.

BACKGROUND: Patients presenting with large core infarctions benefit from treatment with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), with a notable 50% reduction in rates of severe disability (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 5) at 90 days. We studied the ability of previously reported prognostic scales to predict devastating outcomes in patients with a large ischemic core and limited salvageable brain tissue. METHODS: Retrospective analysis from a health system's code stroke registry, including consecutive thrombectomy patients from November 2017 to December 2022 with an anterior circulation large vessel occlusion, computed tomography perfusion core infarct ≥ 50 ml, and mismatch volume < 15 ml or mismatch ratio < 1.8. Previously reported scales were compared using logistic regression and area under the curve (AUC) analyses to predict 90-day mRS 5-6. RESULTS: Sixty patients (mean age 62.38 ± 14.25 years, median core volume 103 ml [74.75-153]) met inclusion criteria, of whom 27 (45%) had 90-day mRS 5-6. The Charlotte Large artery occlusion endovascular therapy Outcome Score (CLEOS) (odds ratio [OR] 1.35, 95% CI [1.14-1.60], p = 0.0005), Houston Intra-Arterial Therapy-2 (OR 1.35, 95% CI [1.00-1.83], p = 0.0470), and Totaled Health Risks in Vascular Events (OR 1.53, 95% CI [1.07-2.18], p = 0.0199) predicted the primary outcome in the logistic regression analysis. CLEOS performed best in the AUC analysis (AUC 0.83, 95% CI [0.72-0.94]). CONCLUSION: CLEOS predicts devastating outcomes after EVT in patients with large core infarctions and small volumes of ischemic penumbra.

The charlotte large artery occlusion endovascular therapy outcome score compares favorably to the critical area perfusion score for prognostication before basilar thrombectomy.

INTRODUCTION: The Critical Area Perfusion Score (CAPS) predicts functional outcomes in vertebrobasilar thrombectomy patients based on computed tomography perfusion (CTP) hypoperfusion. We compared CAPS to the clinical-radiographic Charlotte Large artery occlusion Endovascular therapy Outcome Score (CLEOS). METHODS: Acute basilar thrombosis patients from January 2017-December 2021 were included in this retrospective analysis from a health system's stroke registry. Inter-rater reliability was assessed for 6 CAPS raters. A logistic regression with CAPS and CLEOS as predictors was performed to predict 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 4-6. Area under the curve (AUC) analyses were performed to evaluate prognostic ability. RESULTS: 55 patients, mean age 65.8 (± 13.1) years and median NIHSS score 15.55-24, were included. Light's kappa among 6 raters for favorable versus unfavorable CAPS was 0.633 (95% CI 0.497-0.785). Increased CLEOS was associated with elevated odds of a poor outcome (odds ratio (OR) 1.0010, 95% CI 1.0007-1.0014, p<0.01), though CAPS was not (OR 1.0028, 95% CI 0.9420-1.0676, p=0.93). An overall favorable trend was observed for CLEOS (AUC 0.69, 95% CI 0.54-0.84) versus CAPS (AUC 0.49, 95% CI 0.34-0.64; p=0.051). Among 85.5% of patients with endovascular reperfusion, CLEOS had a statistically higher sensitivity than CAPS at identifying poor 90-day outcomes (71% versus 21%, p=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: CLEOS demonstrated better predictive ability than CAPS for poor outcomes overall and in patients achieving reperfusion after basilar thrombectomy.

The Charlotte Large Artery Occlusion Endovascular Therapy Outcome Score Predicts Poor Outcomes 1 Year After Endovascular Thrombectomy.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the ability of several outcome prognostic scales to predict poor 1-year outcomes and mortality after endovascular thrombectomy. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis from the stroke registry of a large integrated health system, consecutive patients presenting from August 2020 to September 2021 with an anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy were included. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine the ability of each scale to predict the primary outcome (1-year modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score of 4-6) and the secondary outcome (1-year mortality). Area under the curve analyses were performed for each scale. RESULTS: In 237 included patients (mean age 68 [±15] years; median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 16 [11-21]), poor 1-year outcomes were present in 116 patients (49%) and 1-year mortality was 34%. The CLEOS (Charlotte Large Artery Occlusion Endovascular Therapy Outcome Score), which incorporates age, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, initial glucose level, and computed tomography perfusion cerebral blood volume index, had a significant association with poor 1-year outcomes (per 25-point increase; odds ratio, 1.0134; P = 0.02). CLEOS and PRE (Pittsburgh Response to Endovascular Therapy) were both significantly associated with 1-year mortality. Area under the curve values were comparable for CLEOS, PRE, Houston Intra-Arterial Therapy 2, and Totaled Health Risks in Vascular Events to predict 1-year mRS score 4-6 and mortality. Only 1 of 18 patients with CLEOS ≥690 had a 1-year mRS score of 0-3. CONCLUSIONS: CLEOS can predict poor 1-year outcomes and mortality for patients with anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion using prethrombectomy variables.

A Telestroke Nurse and Neuroradiologist Model for Extended Window Code Stroke Triage.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Distinguishing features of our stroke network include routine involvement of a telestroke nurse (TSRN) for code stroke activations at nonthrombectomy centers and immediate availability of neuroradiologists for imaging interpretation. On May 1, 2021, we implemented a new workflow for code stroke activations presenting beyond 4.5 hours from last known well that relied on a TSRN supported by a neuroradiologist for initial triage. Patients without a target large vessel occlusion (LVO) were managed without routine involvement of a teleneurologist, which represented a change from the preimplementation period. METHODS: We collected data 6 months before and after implementation of the new workflow. We compared preimplementation process metrics for patients managed with teleneurologist involvement with the postimplementation patients managed without teleneurologist involvement. RESULTS: With the new workflow, teleneurologist involvement decreased from 95% (n = 953) for patients presenting beyond 4.5 hours from last known well to 37% (n = 373; P < .001). Compared with patients in the preimplementation period, postimplementation patients without teleneurologist involvement experienced less inpatient hospital admission and observation (87% vs 90%; unadjusted P = .038, adjusted P = .06). Among the preimplementation and postimplementation admitted patients, there was no statistically significant difference in follow-up neurology consultation or nonstroke diagnoses. A similar percentage of LVO patients were transferred to the thrombectomy center (54% pre vs 49% post, P = .612), whereas more LVO transfers in the postimplementation cohort received thrombectomy therapy (75% post vs 39% pre, P = .014). Among LVO patients (48 pre and 41 post), no statistical significance was observed in imaging and management times. CONCLUSION: Our work shows the successful teaming of a TSRN and a neuroradiologist to triage acute stroke patients who present beyond an eligibility window for systemic thrombolysis, without negatively impacting care and process metrics. This innovative partnering may help to preserve the availability of teleneurologists by limiting their involvement when diagnostic imaging drives decision making.

Transcranial ultrasonography to detect intracranial pathology: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Transcranial ultrasonography (TCU) can be a useful diagnostic tool in evaluating intracranial pathology in patients with limited or delayed access to routine neuroimaging in critical care or austere settings. We reviewed available literature investigating the diagnostic utility of TCU for detecting pediatric and adult patient's intracranial pathology in patients with intact skulls and reported diagnostic accuracy measures. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of PubMed® , Cochrane Library, Embase® , Scopus® , Web of Science™, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases to identify articles evaluating ultrasound-based detection of intracranial pathology in comparison to routine imaging using broad Medical Subject Heading sets. Two independent reviewers reviewed the retrieved articles for bias using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tools and extracted measures of diagnostic accuracy and ultrasound parameters. Data were pooled using meta-analysis implementing a random-effects approach to examine the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of ultrasound-based diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 44 studies out of the 3432 articles screened met the eligibility criteria, totaling 2426 patients (Mean age: 60.1 ± 14.52 years). We found tumors, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and neurodegenerative diseases in the eligible studies. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of TCU and their 95% confidence intervals were 0.80 (0.72, 0.89), 0.71 (0.59, 0.82), and 0.76 (0.71, 0.82) for neurodegenerative diseases; 0.88 (0.74, 1.02), 0.81 (0.50, 1.12), and 0.94 (0.92, 0.96) for ICH; and 0.97 (0.92, 1.03), 0.99 (0.96, 1.01), and 0.99 (0.97, 1.01) for intracranial masses. No studies reported ultrasound presets. CONCLUSIONS: TCU has a reasonable sensitivity and specificity for detecting intracranial pathology involving ICH and tumors with clinical applications in remote locations or where standard imaging is unavailable. Future studies should investigate ultrasound parameters to enhance diagnostic accuracy in diagnosing intracranial pathology.

Validation of the Charlotte large artery occlusion endovascular therapy outcome score using Viz.ai-derived cerebral blood volume index.

BACKGROUND: The Charlotte large artery occlusion endovascular therapy outcome score (CLEOS) predicts poor 90-day outcomes for patients presenting with internal carotid artery (ICA) or middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusions. It incorporates RAPID-derived cerebral blood volume (CBV) index, a marker of collateral circulation. We validated the predictive ability of CLEOS with Viz.ai-processed computed tomography perfusion (CTP) imaging. METHODS: The original CLEOS derivation cohort was compared to a validation cohort consisting of all ICA and MCA thrombectomy patients treated at a large health system with Viz.ai-processed CTP. Rates of poor 90-day outcome (mRS 4-6) were compared in the derivation and validation cohorts, stratified by CLEOS. CLEOS was compared to previously described prediction models using area under the curve (AUC) analyses. Calibration of CLEOS was performed to compare predicted risk of poor outcomes with observed outcomes. RESULTS: One-hundred eighty-one patients (mean age 66.4 years, median NIHSS 16) in the validation cohort were included. The validation cohort had higher median CTP core volumes (24 vs 8 ml) and smaller median mismatch volumes (81 vs 101 ml) than the derivation cohort. CLEOS-predicted poor outcomes strongly correlated with observed outcomes (R2 = 0.82). AUC for CLEOS in the validation cohort (0.72, 95% CI 0.64-0.80) was similar to the derivation cohort (AUC 0.75, 95% CI 0.70-0.80) and was comparable or superior to previously described prognostic models. CONCLUSIONS: CLEOS can predict risk of poor 90-day outcomes in ICA and MCA thrombectomy patients evaluated with pre-intervention, Viz.ai-processed CTP.

Automated detection of intracranial large vessel occlusions using Viz.ai software: Experience in a large, integrated stroke network.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Endovascular thrombectomy is an evidence-based treatment for large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke. Commercially available artificial intelligence has been designed to detect the presence of an LVO on computed tomography angiogram (CTA). We compared Viz.ai-LVO (San Francisco, CA, USA) to CTA interpretation by board-certified neuroradiologists (NRs) in a large, integrated stroke network. METHODS: From January 2021 to December 2021, we compared Viz.ai detection of an internal carotid artery (ICA) or middle cerebral artery first segment (MCA-M1) occlusion to the gold standard of CTA interpretation by board-certified NRs for all code stroke CTAs. On a monthly basis, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. Trend analyses were conducted to evaluate for any improvement of LVO detection by the software over time. RESULTS: 3851 patients met study inclusion criteria, of whom 220 (5.7%) had an ICA or MCA-M1 occlusion per NR. Sensitivity and specificity were 78.2% (95% CI 72%-83%) and 97% (95% CI 96%-98%), respectively. PPV was 61% (95% CI 55%-67%), NPV 99% (95% CI 98%-99%), and accuracy was 95.9% (95% CI 95.3%-96.5%). Neither specificity or sensitivity improved over time in the trend analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Viz.ai-LVO has high specificity and moderately high sensitivity to detect an ICA or proximal MCA occlusion. The software has the potential to streamline code stroke workflows and may be particularly impactful when emergency access to NRs or vascular neurologists is limited.

The Charlotte large artery occlusion endovascular therapy outcome score predicts outcome after basilar artery thrombectomy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Charlotte Large artery occlusion Endovascular therapy Outcome Score (CLEOS) and Totaled Health Risks in Vascular Events (THRIVE) predict functional outcomes after anterior circulation endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). We evaluated the performance of CLEOS and THRIVE in patients presenting with an acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) treated with EVT. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a health system's stroke registry. Patients presenting with an acute BAO treated with EVT and evaluated with pre-thrombectomy CT perfusion (CTP) from January 2017 to December 2021 were included. CLEOS = (5 × age) + (10 × National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS]) + Glucose - (150 × CTP cerebral blood volume index) and THRIVE (0-9 points) = age 60-79 years, 1 point; age ≥ 80 years, 2 points; NIHSS 11-20, 2 points; NIHSS ≥ 21, 4 points; hypertension, diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, 1 point each. Multivariable logistic regression was performed for the ability of CLEOS and THRIVE to predict the primary outcome, modified Rankin Scale score 3-6. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients had mean age 66.6 (± 14.9) years and median NIHSS 15.5 (5-24). In the multivariable regression analysis, increased CLEOS was associated with significantly higher odds of a poor functional outcome (odds ratio [OR] = 1.0011, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0003-1.0019, p = .008), whereas THRIVE was not (OR = 1.0326, 95% CI: 0.9478-1.1250, p = .466). CLEOS > 503 best predicted poor outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: A higher CLEOS score was associated with elevated odds of a poor 90-day functional outcome in our cohort of acute BAO patients treated with EVT.

Brain topography on adult ultrasound images: Techniques, interpretation, and image library.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Many studies have explored the possibility of using cranial ultrasound for discerning intracranial pathologies like tumors, hemorrhagic stroke, or subdural hemorrhage in clinical scenarios where computer tomography may not be accessible or feasible. The visualization of intracranial anatomy on B-mode ultrasound is challenging due to the presence of the skull that limits insonation to a few segments on the temporal bone that are thin enough to allow transcranial transmission of sound. Several artifacts are produced by hyperechoic signals inherent in brain and skull anatomy when images are created using temporal windows. METHODS: While the literature has investigated the accuracy of diagnosis of intracranial pathology with ultrasound, we lack a reference source for images acquired on cranial topography on B-mode ultrasound to illustrate the appearance of normal and abnormal structures of the brain and skull. Two investigators underwent hands-on training in Cranial point-of-care ultrasound (c-POCUS) and acquired multiple images from each patient to obtain the most in-depth images of brain to investigate all visible anatomical structures and pathology within 24 hours of any CT/MRI imaging done. RESULTS: Most reproducible structures visible on c-POCUS included bony parts and parenchymal structures. Transcranial and abdominal presets were equivalent in elucidating anatomical structures. Brain pathology like parenchymal hemorrhage, cerebral edema, and hydrocephalus were also visualized. CONCLUSIONS: We present an illustrated anatomical atlas of cranial ultrasound B-mode images acquired in various pathologies in a critical care environment and compare our findings with published literature by performing a scoping review of literature on the subject.

Visualization of the Anterior Temporal Artery as a Predictor of Outcome in Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion Patients Achieving Successful Recanalization After Transfer.

Introduction Anterior temporal artery (ATA) visualization on computed tomography angiography (CTA) has been previously associated with good outcomes in middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusions, but not in the setting of patients who initially present to non-thrombectomy centers. Methods We retrospectively identified acute MCA (M1) occlusion patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy after transfer from non-thrombectomy-capable centers. Neuroradiologists confirmed the MCA (M1) as the most proximal site of occlusion on CTA and assessed for visualization of the ATA. Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) 2b or greater revascularization scores were confirmed by neurointerventionalists blinded to patient outcomes. Ninety-day modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores were obtained via a structured telephone questionnaire. Results We identified 102 M1 occlusion patients over a three-and-a-half-year period presenting to a non-thrombectomy-capable center who underwent transfer and mechanical thrombectomy. There were no significant differences in age, gender, race, comorbidities, or median National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores between the ATA visualized (n = 47) versus non-visualized (n = 55) cohort, and no significant differences in baseline Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography (ASPECT) scores, post-intervention TICI scores, or interval from last known well to revascularization. There was a strong trend in functional independent outcome (mRS ≤ 2) for patients with ATA visualization (63.8% vs. 45.5%, p = 0.064). Conclusion For patients presenting to non-thrombectomy centers without CT perfusion capability, ATA visualization should be further investigated as an outcome predictor, given its association with functional independence after successful recanalization. This article was previously presented as a meeting abstract at the 2021 International Stroke Conference on March 17-19, 2021.

Endovascular Thrombectomy Reduces Risk of Poor Functional Outcomes in Patients Presenting within 0-6 Hours with Large Ischemic Core Volumes on Computed Tomography Perfusion.

INTRODUCTION: Patients presenting with large ischemic core volumes (LICVs) on computed tomography perfusion (CTP) are at high risk for poor functional outcomes. We sought to identify predictors of outcome in patients with an internal carotid artery (ICA) or middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion and LICV. METHODS: A large healthcare system's prospectively collected code stroke registry was utilized for this retrospective analysis of patients presenting within 6 hours with at least 50 ml of CTP reduced relative cerebral blood flow (CBF) < 30%. A multivariable logistic regression model was constructed to identify independent predictors (p < 0.05) of poor discharge outcome (modified Rankin scale score 4-6). RESULTS: Over a 38-month period, we identified 104 patients meeting inclusion criteria, with a mean age of 65.4 ± 16.2 years, median presenting National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 20 (IQR 16-24), median ischemic core volume (CBF < 30%) 82 ml (IQR 61-118), and median mismatch volume 80 ml (IQR 56-134). Seventy-five patients (72.1%) had a discharge modified Rankin scale score of 4-6. Sixty-six of 104 (63.5%) patients were treated with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). In the multivariable regression model, EVT (OR 0.303; 95% CI 0.080-0.985; p = 0.049) and lower blood glucose (per 1-point increase, OR 1.014; 95% CI 1.003-1.030; p = 0.030) were independently protective against poor discharge outcome. CONCLUSIONS: EVT is independently associated with a reduced risk of poor functional outcome in patients presenting within 6 hours with ICA or MCA occlusions and LICV.

A tool to improve stroke outcome prediction: The charlotte large artery occlusion endovascular therapy outcome score.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to optimize functional outcome prediction for large artery occlusion (LAO) patients treated with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients presenting with an anterior circulation LAO treated with EVT from November 2016-July 2020 were included from a health system's code stroke registry. Data were separated into training and validation cohorts using a simple random sampling method. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify pre-intervention prognostic factors independently associated with 90-day modified Rankin score 4-6 in the training cohort. The model was tested in the validation cohort and compared to previously reported scales using Area Under Curve (AUC) analyses. RESULTS: 646 total patients were included. The Charlotte Large artery occlusion Endovascular therapy Outcome Score, CLEOS = (5 x Age) + (10 x NIHSS) + Glucose - (150 x Cerebral Blood Volume Index). CLEOS was associated with an increased odds of poor 90-day outcome (per 1-point increase, OR 1.008, 95% CI 1.006-1.010, p < 0.0001) and performed better than Stroke Prognostication using Age and National Institute of Health Stroke Scale - 100 (AUC 0.62, p < 0.0001) and Houston Intra-Arterial Therapy 2 (AUC 0.70, p < 0.0063), with a trend observed versus Pittsburgh Response to Endovascular therapy (AUC 0.72, p = 0.0884), in the combined analysis of the derivation and validation cohorts. CLEOS ≥ 700 was not associated with a lower risk of poor outcome despite excellent endovascular reperfusion. CONCLUSIONS: CLEOS can predict poor 90-day outcomes after thrombectomy and help risk stratify patients based on the degree of revascularization after EVT.

Association of Recent Use of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants With Intracranial Hemorrhage Among Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Treated With Alteplase.

Importance: Current guidelines recommend against use of intravenous alteplase in patients with acute ischemic stroke who are taking non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). Objective: To evaluate the safety and functional outcomes of intravenous alteplase among patients who were taking NOACs prior to stroke and compare outcomes with patients who were not taking long-term anticoagulants. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study of 163 038 patients with acute ischemic stroke either taking NOACs or not taking anticoagulants prior to stroke and treated with intravenous alteplase within 4.5 hours of symptom onset at 1752 US hospitals participating in the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke program between April 2015 and March 2020, with complementary data from the Addressing Real-world Anticoagulant Management Issues in Stroke registry. Exposures: Prestroke treatment with NOACs within 7 days prior to alteplase treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurring within 36 hours after intravenous alteplase administration. There were 4 secondary safety outcomes, including inpatient mortality, and 7 secondary functional outcomes assessed at hospital discharge, including the proportion of patients discharged home. Results: Of 163 038 patients treated with intravenous alteplase (median age, 70 [IQR, 59 to 81] years; 49.1% women), 2207 (1.4%) were taking NOACs and 160 831 (98.6%) were not taking anticoagulants prior to their stroke. Patients taking NOACs were older (median age, 75 [IQR, 64 to 82] years vs 70 [IQR, 58 to 81] years for those not taking anticoagulants), had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities, and experienced more severe strokes (median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, 10 [IQR, 5 to 17] vs 7 [IQR, 4 to 14]) (all standardized differences >10). The unadjusted rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was 3.7% (95% CI, 2.9% to 4.5%) for patients taking NOACs vs 3.2% (95% CI, 3.1% to 3.3%) for patients not taking anticoagulants. After adjusting for baseline clinical factors, the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was not significantly different between groups (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.88 [95% CI, 0.70 to 1.10]; adjusted risk difference [RD], -0.51% [95% CI, -1.36% to 0.34%]). There were no significant differences in the secondary safety outcomes, including inpatient mortality (6.3% for patients taking NOACs vs 4.9% for patients not taking anticoagulants; adjusted OR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.69 to 1.01]; adjusted RD, -1.20% [95% CI, -2.39% to -0%]). Of the secondary functional outcomes, 4 of 7 showed significant differences in favor of the NOAC group after adjustment, including the proportion of patients discharged home (45.9% vs 53.6% for patients not taking anticoagulants; adjusted OR, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.06 to 1.29]; adjusted RD, 3.84% [95% CI, 1.46% to 6.22%]). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous alteplase, use of NOACs within the preceding 7 days, compared with no use of anticoagulants, was not associated with a significantly increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage.

Cerebral blood volume index as a predictor of functional independence after basilar artery thrombectomy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The role of CT perfusion (CTP)in the evaluation of acute basilar artery occlusion (aBAO) patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is unclear. We investigated the association of individual CTP parameters with functional outcomes in aBAO patients undergoing EVT. METHODS: A health system's prospectively collected code stroke registry was used in this retrospective analysis of aBAO patients treated with EVT presenting between January 2017 and February 2021 with pre-EVT CTP. The primary outcome measure was modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0-2 at 90 days. Factors with a univariate association (p < .05) with mRS 0-2 were combined in a multivariable regression model to determine independent predictors of 90-day favorable functional outcome. RESULTS: Forty-six subjects, with median age 67 years and median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale 16, were included, of whom 17 (37%) achieved mRS 0-2 at 90 days. In the multivariable logistic regression model, CTP cerebral blood volume (CBV) index (per 0.1-point increase, odds ratio = 1.843; 95% confidence interval: 1.039, 3.268; p-value .0365) was independently associated with a favorable 90-day outcome. CONCLUSIONS: CBV index was independently associated with a favorable 90-day outcome in aBAO patients treated with EVT, a novel finding in this patient population. CBV index may assist in treatment and prognosis discussions and inform future studies investigating the role of CTP in aBAO.

Prehospital Evaluation of the FAST-ED as a Secondary Stroke Screen to Identify Large Vessel Occlusion Strokes.

Introduction: The Field Assessment Stroke Triage for Emergency Destination (FAST-ED) was developed to identify Large Vessel Occlusion Strokes (LVOS) presenting out of hospital, although there is limited prospective research validating its use in this setting. This study evaluated the test characteristics of the FAST-ED to identify LVOS when used as a secondary stroke screen in the prehospital environment. Secondary analysis compared the performance of the CPSS and the FAST-ED in identifying an LVOS. Methods: This prospective, observational study was conducted from April 2018 to December 2019 in a municipal EMS system with all ALS ambulance response. The FAST-ED was implemented as a secondary screening tool for emergent stroke patients who had at least one positive Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Screen (CPSS) item. CPSS and FAST-ED scores were extracted from prehospital electronic care reports, while the presence of LVOS was extracted from hospital records. Results: A total 1,359 patients were enrolled; 55.3% female, 47.5% white, with a mean age of 69.4 (SD 15.8). In this cohort, 11.3% of patients experienced an LVOS. The mean FAST-ED for a patient experiencing an LVOS was 5.33 (95%CI 4.97-5.69) compared to 3.06 (95%CI 2.95-3.12) (p < 0.001). A score of greater or equal to 4 yielded the highest combination of sensitivity (77.78%) and specificity (65.34%) with positive likelihood ratio 2.24 (95% CI 2.00-2.52) and negative likelihood ratio 0.34 (95% CI 0.25-0.46). Area under the ROC curve was 0.77 (95%CI 0.73, 0.81). A CPSS with all three items positive demonstrated a sensitivity of 73.20% and 69.57% specificity, with an ROC area of 0.73 (95% CI 0.70-0.77). When comparing a FAST-ED ≥4 to a CPSS of all positive items, there was no significant difference in sensitivity (p > 0.05), and the FAST-ED had a significantly lower specificity than the CPSS (p < 0.005). Conclusion: As stroke care advances, EMS agencies must consider their destination triage needs. This study suggests agencies must consider the use of single versus secondary scales, and to determine the ideal sensitivity and specificity for their system.

Brain venography performance following the pause of Ad.26.COV2.S COVID-19 vaccine administration.

Cases of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) associated with vaccine induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) were reported following administration of the adenoviral vector COVID-19 vaccines, resulting in a pause in Ad.26.COV2.S vaccine administration in the United States, beginning on April 14, 2021. We aimed to quantify and characterize an anticipated increase in brain venograms performed in response to this pause. Brain venogram cases were retrospectively identified during the three-week period following the vaccine pause and during the same calendar period in 2019. For venograms performed in 2021, we compared COVID vaccinated to unvaccinated patients. There was a 262% increase in venograms performed between 2019 (n = 26) and 2021 (n = 94), compared to only a 19% increase in all radiologic studies. Fifty-seven percent of patients in 2021 had a history of COVID-19 vaccination, with the majority being Ad.26.COV2.S. All patients diagnosed with CVT were unvaccinated. COVID vaccinated patients lacked platelet or D-dimer measurements consistent with VITT. Significantly more vaccinated versus unvaccinated patients had a headache (94% vs 70%, p = 0.0014), but otherwise lacked compelling CVT presentations, such as decreased/altered consciousness (7% vs 23%, p = 0.036), neurologic deficit (28% vs 48%, p = 0.049), and current/recent pregnancy (2% vs 28%, p = 0.0003). We found a dramatic increase in brain venograms performed following publicity of rare COVID-19 vaccine associated CVT cases, with no CVTs identified in vaccinated patients. Clinicians should carefully consider if brain venogram performance is indicated in COVID-19 vaccinated patients lacking thrombocytopenia and D-dimer elevation, especially without other compelling CVT risk factors or symptoms.