The association between stent type and developing angina pectoris following percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Angina pectoris can occur in up to 40% of patients following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). There is limited data assessing whether the type of stent implanted during revascularization can predict post-PCI angina symptoms. METHODS: In this study, data regarding revascularization characteristics including the stent type in patients admitted for PCI was collected. Prospective data including occurrence of angina and the presenting class, new onset ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and other clinical outcomes were collected at 1, 3, and 6-month follow-up intervals. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the potential predictors of angina symptoms at 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 787 patients (64.5% males) undergoing PCI with three stent types (Orsiro, Promus, and Xience) were included in the study. The occurrence of post PCI angina pectoris and new STEMI was similar among the stent types (p > 0.05). A linear association was found between the development of new STEMI (p = 0.018) and stroke (p = 0.003) and the worsening of angina class. The stent type was not a predictor of angina during the follow-up period. Other variables including dyslipidemia (odds ratio (OR) (95% CI), 1.51 (1.08; 2.10)), prior coronary artery disease (CAD) (OR (95% CI), 1.63 (1.02; 2.61)), and previous hospitalization (OR (95% CI), 2.10 (1.22; 3.63)) were independent predictors of angina. CONCLUSIONS: Although the type of stent may not have an association with the post-PCI angina, other predictors such as dyslipidemia and previous CAD and hospitalization may predict recurrence of cardiac angina. The class of angina severity may have a linear association with new-onset STEMI and stroke.

Design and rationale for a randomized, open-label, parallel clinical trial evaluating major adverse cardiovascular events (pharmacological treatment versus diet control) in patients with high-normal blood pressure: the PRINT-TAHA9 trial.

BACKGROUND: The distinction between normal and high blood pressure remains a debated topic, with varying guidelines on when to start medication. Contemporary guidelines advocate for the initiation of antihypertensive therapy in individuals who present with high-normal blood pressure, particularly those exhibiting elevated 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk scores. Despite these recommendations, there is a notable lack of direct evidence supporting the efficacy of treating high-normal blood pressure to prevent major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). METHODS: The PRINT-TAHA9 trial, a unicentric, randomized, open-label, controlled, parallel clinical study, seeks to explore the effects of intensive blood pressure control on MACE in participants with high-normal blood pressure. We will enroll 1620 adults aged 18 years and above with a systolic blood pressure range of 130-140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure under 90 mmHg, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk score exceeding 7.5%. The study will be executed in five distinct phases, with each phase enrolling between 300 and 400 participants. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the treatment group receiving antihypertensive medication (amlodipine/valsartan) and a low-salt/low-fat diet or to the control group receiving a similar diet. Follow-up visits are scheduled every 6 months over a 3-year period to monitor blood pressure, evaluate medication adherence, document any adverse events, and adjust the intervention as necessary. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis will be employed to examine the disparities between the two arms. DISCUSSION: Despite guidelines promoting early treatment of elevated blood pressure, the debate continues due to insufficient evidence that such interventions significantly reduce the occurrence of MACE. This trial seeks to address this critical evidence gap. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The PRINT-TAHA9 trial was registered in October 2019 with the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT.ir) under the registration number IRCT20191002044961N1. https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/trial/43092 .

Efficacy of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation on major adverse cardiovascular events and cardiac function indices in patients with chronic heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: The effects of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) on heart failure (HF) have been controversial. This study was conducted to investigate whether the transplantation of MSCs after HF could help improve clinical outcomes and myocardial performance indices. METHODS: Using a systematic approach, electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which evaluated the transplantation of MSCs after HF. The outcomes owf interest included clinical outcomes and myocardial function indices. We also assessed the role of age, cause of heart failure, cell origin, cell number, type of donor (autologous/allogeneic), and route of cell delivery on these outcomes. Using the random-effects method, a relative risk (RR) or mean difference (MD) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled. RESULTS: Seventeen RCTs including 1684 patients (927 and 757 patients in the intervention and control arms, respectively) were enrolled. The RR (95% CI) of mortality was 0.78 (0.62; 0.99, p = 0.04) in the MSC group compared to the controls. HF rehospitalization decreased in the MSC group (RR = 0.85 (0.71-1.01), p = 0.06), but this was only significant in those who received autologous MSCs (RR = 0.67 (0.49; 0.90), p = 0.008). LVEF was significantly increased among those who received MSC (MD = 3.38 (1.89; 4.87), p < 0.001). LVESV (MD = -9.14 (-13.25; -5.03), p < 0.001), LVEDV (MD = -8.34 -13.41; -3.27), p < 0.001), and scar size (standardized MD = -0.32 (-0.60; -0.05), p = 0.02) were significantly decreased. NYHA class (MD = -0.19 (-0.34; -0.06), p = 0.006), BNP level (standardized MD = -0.28 (-0.50; -0.06), p = 0.01), and MLHFQ (MD = -11.55 (-16.77; -6.33), p = 0.005) significantly decreased and 6-min walk test significantly improved (MD = 36.86 (11.22; 62.50), p = 0.001) in the MSC group. Trials were not affected by the participants' etiology of heart failure, while trials with the autologous source of cells, MSC doses lower than 100 million cells, and intracoronary injection performed significantly better in some of the outcomes. CONCLUSION: Transplantation of MSCs for ischemic or dilated heart failure patients may reduce all-cause mortality and improve clinical condition. Moreover, this treatment would improve left ventricular function indices and reduce scar size.

Comparative effectiveness of mesenchymal stem cell versus bone-marrow mononuclear cell transplantation in heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: There is no clear evidence on the comparative effectiveness of bone-marrow mononuclear cell (BMMNC) vs. mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) stem cell therapy in patients with chronic heart failure (HF). METHODS: Using a systematic approach, eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of stem cell therapy (BMMNCs or MSCs) in patients with HF were retrieved to perform a meta-analysis on clinical outcomes (major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), hospitalization for HF, and mortality) and echocardiographic indices (including left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)) were performed using the random-effects model. A risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled based on the type of the outcome and subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate the potential differences between the types of cells. RESULTS: The analysis included a total of 36 RCTs (1549 HF patients receiving stem cells and 1252 patients in the control group). Transplantation of both types of cells in patients with HF resulted in a significant improvement in LVEF (BMMNCs: MD (95% CI) = 3.05 (1.11; 4.99) and MSCs: MD (95% CI) = 2.82 (1.19; 4.45), between-subgroup p = 0.86). Stem cell therapy did not lead to a significant change in the risk of MACE (MD (95% CI) = 0.83 (0.67; 1.06), BMMNCs: RR (95% CI) = 0.59 (0.31; 1.13) and MSCs: RR (95% CI) = 0.91 (0.70; 1.19), between-subgroup p = 0.12). There was a marginally decreased risk of all-cause death (MD (95% CI) = 0.82 (0.68; 0.99)) and rehospitalization (MD (95% CI) = 0.77 (0.61; 0.98)) with no difference among the cell types (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Both types of stem cells are effective in improving LVEF in patients with heart failure without any noticeable difference between the cells. Transplantation of the stem cells could not decrease the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events compared with controls. Future trials should primarily focus on the impact of stem cell transplantation on clinical outcomes of HF patients to verify or refute the findings of this study.

Polypill versus medication monotherapy in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases in Iran: An economic evaluation study.

Background and Aims: Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are one of the major diseases in developing and developed countries and have high prevalence and mortality rates. Pharmacological interventions, especially the use of combination medications, can have preventive effects in patients with CVDs. Recently, in the PolyIran trial, a combination of atorvastatin, hydrochlorothiazide, aspirin, and valsartan or enalapril (Polypill) was shown to be effective in providing survival benefits as a primary prevention strategy. In the present study, we examine the cost-effectiveness of the use of polypill compared to its individual components (named as medication monotherapy) in the prevention of CVDs in Iran. Methods: This was an economic evaluation study conducted to compare the cost-utility of polypill with that of medication monotherapy for 10,000 hypothetical cohorts of people over 35 years of age using the Markov model and with a lifetime horizon. The study perspective was patient perspective and direct medical costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio were estimated. To deal with uncertaintysensitivity analyses were used. Results: The results showed that polypill, with the lowest costs (871 USD) and highest QALYs (14.55), had the most cost-utility than medication monotherapy. Also, the results showed that the highest sensitivities were related to the utilities of angina and stroke states. At the 21,768 USD threshold, polypill had a 92% probability of being cost-effective versus other medications. Conclusion: Considering that polypill had the most cost-utility, it is suggested that health system policymakers pay special attention to polypill in designing clinical guidelines. Also, through covering this medication by health insurance organizations, it is possible to complete the country's medicine pharmacopeia in preventing CVDs.

Effect of different reperfusion strategies on recovery of ventricular function after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A longitudinal single-center study.

Background and Aims: Although the clinical benefit of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on cardiovascular outcomes has been widely investigated, the impact of this revascularization strategy compared to other alternatives on the degree of left ventricular function recovery is poorly demonstrated. In this regard, we investigated whether time delays between the presentation of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and PCI in reperfusion strategies have different impacts on left ventricular function recovery. Methods: In this single-center study, all the patients who presented with STEMI and a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≤ 40%) were enrolled. Included patients were subjected to four different treatment groups of primary, rescue (immediate transfer for angioplasty due to failed fibrinolytic therapy), facilitated (fibrinolytic therapy followed by angioplasty within 24 h), and deferred (successful fibrinolytic therapy and PCI after 24 h) PCI based on hospital facilities. Echocardiography was performed for all the patients at the time of hospitalization and 6 months later. Results: A total of 128 patients were included in this study. The LVEF improved by 15.3 ± 6.3%, 11.5 ± 3.61%, 4.0 ± 1.0%, and -1.3 ± 7.0% in primary, rescue, facilitated, and deferred PCI groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Patients undergoing deferred PCI experienced a significantly lower improvement in LVEF compared with primary and rescue PCI (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Primary PCI demonstrated the most promising recovery in left ventricular function following STEMI compared to other alternative strategies. Performing PCI as soon as possible provides better recovery of LVEF.

Hemoglobin A1c levels and 1-year mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Background: In this study, we investigated whether different levels of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) are associated with different short-term and 1-year mortality rates among diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients & methods: Clinical events including in-hospital, 1-month and 1-year mortality were compared between three groups based on HbA1c levels of patients (I: ≤5.6%, II: 5.7-6.4%, III: ≥6.5%). Results: Among 165 diabetic individuals, patients with abnormal HbA1c levels (≥6.5%) experienced significantly higher hospitalization days (7.65 ± 1.64 days) compared with those with normal HbA1c (4.94 ± 0.97 days) (p < 0.0001). In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in group III (14.5%) and II (5.5%) compared with group I (0%) (p = 0.008). Conclusion: HbA1c levels may be a reliable predictor of short-term clinical events in diabetic patients.

[Box: see text].

Management of Anterior Urethral Stricture: A Survey of Contemporary Practice of Iranian Urologists.

PURPOSE: To evaluate Iranian urologists' approach to urethral stricture and assess how often they select open urethroplasty over minimally invasive procedures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This cross-sectional observational study was conducted via www. SURVEY: porsline.ir among members of the Iranian urologists' community. The urologists were contacted via email and social media applications (e.g., WhatsApp, Telegram), and data, including their demographic information and years of practice, as well as questions related to their attitude towards the management of urethral stricture, were collected. RESULTS: A total number of 376 patients were included in the current survey. The specialty of reconstructive urology was selected by less than 2% (n=5) as their field of interest. Only 6.64% (n=25) of the urologists stated that they received adequate training for management of urethral stricture. Only about 5% (n=19), believed that according to scientific resources, chose open urethroplasty as the initial management. Almost 94% (n=353) did not perform any urethroplasties during the past year and about 0.2% (n=2) performed more than 20 open urethroplasties. For diagnosing urethral stricture, almost 99% of them chose RUG+VCUG, 72% chose urethrocystoscopy, and 69% chose uroflowmetry in the third place. For evaluation of urethroplasty postoperative outcomes, 76% (n=269) used RUG+VCUG, 15% (n=56) used Rigid Cystoscopy, and 8% (n=29) used Flexible Cystoscopy, Conclusion: Iranian urologists prefer minimally invasive procedures for treating urethral stricture, similar to other countries. This lack of urologists' interest in open urethroplasty is greatly due to poor training during the residency years and little experience with urethral strictures. Therefore, further considerations in order to improve urologists' knowledge and expertise for management of urethral stricture is recommended.

Effectiveness of polypill for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial (PolyPars).

BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of fixed-dose combination therapy (polypill) for primary and secondary prevention of major cardiovascular diseases in a typical rural setting. METHODS: The PolyPars Study is a two-arm pragmatic cluster-randomised trial nested within the PARS cohort study, including all residents aged over 50 years in the entire district in southern Iran. The 91 villages underwent random allocation into two arms: the control arm, encompassing 45 clusters, was subjected to non-pharmacological intervention (educational training on healthy lifestyle), whereas the intervention arm, comprising 46 clusters, received the non-pharmacological interventions in conjunction with a once-daily polypill tablet. This tablet comprised two antihypertensive agents, a statin and aspirin. The primary outcome was the first occurrence of major cardiovascular events defined as a composite of hospitalisation for acute coronary syndrome (non-fatal myocardial infarction and unstable angina), fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal and fatal stroke, sudden death and heart failure. The Cox regression model, with shared frailty, was used to account for clustering effect. RESULTS: During December 2015-December 2016, a total of 4415 participants aged 50-75 years were recruited (2200 participants in the intervention arm and 2215 participants in the control arm). The overall median of follow-up duration was 4.6 years (interquartile interval 4.4-4.9). The achieved adherence rate to polypill in intervention arm was 86%. In the control group, 176 (8.0%) of 2215 participants developed primary outcome, compared with 88 (4.0%) of 2200 participants in the polypill group. We found substantial reduction in risk of primary outcome both in relative and absolute scales (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.65; absolute risk reduction 4.0%, 95% CI 2.5% to 5.3%). No difference in serious adverse events was observed between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The fixed-dose combination therapy using polypill can safely halve the risk of major cardiovascular diseases at the population level. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03459560.

Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy and Autoimmune Disorders: A Systematic Scoping Review of Published Cases.

Introduction: Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TCM) features transient left ventricular apical dysfunction or ballooning. The underlying mechanism remains elusive; however, evidence suggests the role of different physical and psychological stressors. We systematically reviewed patients presenting with TCM and autoimmunity to explore the link between the two conditions. Methods: We applied the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) to report this review. Using keywords related to autoimmune/immune-mediated diseases and TCM, we searched PubMed, Scopus, and WOS in March 2022. The final results were added to a data extraction sheet. Data were analyzed by SPSS version 26.0. Results: Our search yielded 121 studies, including 155 patients. Females were considerably predominant. Most patients had a history of autoimmune disease, and almost a third had a history of cardiovascular disease. Dyspnea and chest pain were the most common chief complaints. More than 70% of patients had experienced physical stress. Myasthenia gravis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and multiple sclerosis were the most frequently reported autoimmune diseases. Conclusion: There were similarities in age and sex compared to classic TCM. TCM should be considered as a differential diagnosis for ACS, especially in patients with a positive background of autoimmunity. A precise reporting system is required for further studies.

Efficacy of exercise training-based cardiac rehabilitation programmes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: The beneficial effects of exercise training-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in different cardiac conditions have been previously studied. In this meta-analysis, we focused on the potential impact of CR on patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Methods: Multiple databases were searched in a systematic approach to find the eligible studies. All the studies investigating the potential impact of exercise training-based CR programmes on exercise capacity and health-related quality of life in patients undergoing TAVI were retrieved. The primary endpoint of interest was 6-min walk test (6MWT). The pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95 % confidence interval (CI) were measured to compare the improvement or worsening the endpoints using a random- or fixed-effects model, as appropriate. Results: A total of eleven studies (685 patients) were considered eligible for quantitative synthesis. The results showed that performing exercise training-based CR after TAVI is associated with significant improvement in 6MWT (SMD 0.59, 95 % CI (0.48; 0.71), p < 0.01), Barthel index (SMD 0.73, 95 % CI (0.57; 0.89), p < 0.01), 12-item Short Form (SF-12) physical (SMD 0.30, 95 % CI (0.08; 0.52), p < 0.01) and mental (SMD 0.27, 95 % CI (0.05; 0.49), p = 0.02) survey scores, and hospital anxiety and depression scale - depression (HADS-D) score (SMD -0.26, 95 % CI (-0.42; -0.10), p < 0.01). Conclusion: Performing exercise training-based CR following TAVI has significant benefits regarding physical capacity and health-related quality of life irrespective of the programme duration.

Clinical outcomes of optical coherence tomography versus conventional angiography guided percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Performing optical coherence tomography (OCT) as a guide for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared to conventional coronary angiography has been the subject of the recent cohorts and randomized trials. However, clear evidence demonstrating its superiority is still controversial. METHODS: We performed a thorough search in digital databases to find the relevant observational studies and randomized trials comparing OCT and angiography in patients undergoing PCI. A random-effects meta-analysis was undertaken comparing clinical outcomes to generate an odds ratio (OR) with a corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Subgroup analyzes were performed based on study design, underlying cardiac condition, and complexity of cases. RESULTS: A total of 21 studies (10 RCTs and 11 observational studies) with 11,163 participants (5319: OCT and 5844: angiography group) were included for quantitative synthesis. Performing OCT was associated with lower odds of all-cause (OR (95% CI) = 0.56 (0.48; 0.67)) and cardiac mortality (OR (95% CI) = 0.47 (0.35; 0.63)), major adverse cardiovascular events (OR (95% CI) = 0.60 (0.48; 0.76)), myocardial infarction (OR (95% CI) = 0.79 (0.64; 0.97)), and stent thrombosis (OR (95% CI) = 0.61 (0.39; 0.96)) compared to the angiography group. Other clinical outcomes were similar between the studied groups. The outperformance of OCT was more evident in observational studies and the ones with PCI on complex lesions. CONCLUSION: Performing OCT prior to PCI is associated with better clinical outcomes compared to angiography alone based on contemporary evidence. Future well-designed randomized trials are needed to confirm the findings of this meta-analysis.

Ablation versus medical therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation: An updated meta-analysis.

To investigate the effect of ablation compared to medical therapy on clinical outcomes of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched using ablation, medical treatment, AF, and related words. The effect of ablation and medical therapy was sought to be gathered on stroke or transitional ischemic attack, mortality, hospitalization, recurrence of AF, progression of AF, and left ventricular ejection fraction. Analyses were performed using R software. 31 studies (the results of 27 randomized controlled trials), compromising an overall 6965 patients (Ablation, n = 3643; Medical treatment, n = 3322) were reviewed in our study, revealed that catheter ablation would result in substantial benefits for patients with AF without significant difference in serious adverse events compared to medical management (Risk Ratio: 0.92, [95% Confidence Interval (CI), 0.64-1.33]). Catheter ablation in patients with AF significantly resulted in a 29% reduction in all-cause mortality (RR: 0.71, [95% CI, 0.57-0.88]), a 57% reduction in hospitalization (RR: 0.43, [95% CI, 0.27-0.67]), a 53% reduction in AF recurrence (RR: 0.47, [95% CI, 0.36-0.61]), and a dramatic reduction, 89%, in progression of paroxysmal to persistent AF (RR: 0.11, [95% CI, 0.02-0.65]); also associated with a remarkable improvement in their left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (Mean Difference, MD: 6.84%, [95% CI, 3.27-10.42]) compared to medical therapy. Our study showed that ablation may be superior to medical therapy in patients with AF regarding AF recurrence, mortality, LVEF improvement, hospitalization, and AF progression outcomes.

Sex-Specific Differences in Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Coronary Bifurcation Lesions.

Coronary bifurcation lesions are frequent challenging findings during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Contemporary evidence has explored the potential sex-specific differences in patients undergoing PCI. In the present meta-analysis, we compared clinical outcomes of patients undergoing bifurcation PCI between women and men. Using the random-effects method, we compared the clinical outcomes of patients with a coronary bifurcation lesion following PCI between women and men. The results were reported using relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Baseline comorbidities and mean age were compared between the 2 studied groups. Four observational studies comprising 30,684 patients (8898 women and 21,786 men) were included in the meta-analysis. Women were significantly older than men with a relatively higher prevalence of baseline comorbidities. After using adjusted data from 2 out of 4 available studies, performing PCI for bifurcation lesions in women was not associated with an increased risk of mortality (RR 1.33, 95% CI, 0.78-2.29), myocardial infarction (RR 1.22, 95% CI, 0.41-3.61), target lesion revascularization (RR 1.06, 95% CI, 0.40-2.81), stent thrombosis (RR 0.99, 95% CI, 0.09-10.52), and stroke (RR 1.19, 95% CI, 0.64-2.22). Women were at higher risk of major bleeding compared to male counterparts (RR 2.23, 95% CI, 1.73-2.89). The present study showed no difference in the risk of adverse clinical outcomes except the risk of bleeding between genders with coronary bifurcation lesions. Future studies with adjustment of age and baseline comorbidities are needed to confirm these findings.

Effect of once versus twice intracoronary injection of allogeneic-derived mesenchymal stromal cells after acute myocardial infarction: BOOSTER-TAHA7 randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) transplantation can improve the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Transplanted MSCs exert a paracrine effect, which might be augmented if repeated doses are administered. This study aimed to compare the effects of single versus double transplantation of Wharton's jelly MSCs (WJ-MSCs) on LVEF post-AMI. METHODS: We conducted a single-blind, randomized, multicenter trial. After 3-7 days of an AMI treated successfully by primary PCI, 70 patients younger than 65 with LVEF < 40% on baseline echocardiography were randomized to receive conventional care, a single intracoronary infusion of WJ-MSCs, or a repeated infusion 10 days later. The primary endpoint was the 6-month LVEF improvement as per cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. RESULTS: The mean baseline EF measured by CMR was similar (~ 40%) in all three groups. By the end of the trial, while all patients experienced a rise in EF, the most significant change was seen in the repeated intervention group. Compared to the control group (n = 25), single MSC transplantation (n = 20) improved the EF by 4.54 ± 2%, and repeated intervention (n = 20) did so by 7.45 ± 2% when measured by CMR imaging (P < 0.001); when evaluated by echocardiography, these values were 6.71 ± 2.4 and 10.71 ± 2.5%, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Intracoronary transplantation of WJ-MSCs 3-7 days after AMI in selected patients significantly improves LVEF, with the infusion of a booster dose 10 days later augmenting this effect. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials, IRCT20201116049408N1. Retrospectively Registered 20 Nov. 2020, https://en.irct.ir/trial/52357.

The impact of antihypertensive treatment of mild to moderate hypertension during pregnancy on maternal and neonatal outcomes: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Currently, there is controversy regarding the treatment of pregnant patients with mild hypertension (blood pressure 140-159/90-109 mm Hg). While guidelines do not recommend this treatment, results from recent clinical trials are supportive of the treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to clarify if active treatment of mild hypertension during pregnancy results in better maternal and fetal outcomes. All of the potentially eligible randomized controlled trials were retrieved through a systematic database search investigating the impact of pharmacological treatment in mild hypertensive patients on maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes. Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. Data from 12 trials comprising 4461 pregnant women diagnosed with mild to moderate hypertension (2395 in the intervention group and 2066 in the control group) were extracted for quantitative synthesis. Antihypertensive treatment was associated with better outcomes in seven out of the 19 analyzed outcomes: Severe hypertension (RR = 0.53; 95% CI = [0.38;0.75]), preeclampsia (RR = 0.71; 95% CI = [0.54; 0.93]), placental abruption (RR = 0.48; 95% CI = [0.26; 0.87]), changes in electrocardiogram (RR = 0.43; 95% CI = [0.25; 0.72]), renal impairment (RR = 0.42; 95% CI = [0.34; 0.51]), pulmonary edema (RR = 0.46; 95% CI = [0.25; 0.84]), and neonatal mortality (RR = 0.72; 95% CI = [0.57; 0.92]). The primary safety outcome of small for gestational age was not different between the treatment group and the control group (RR = 1.12; 95% CI = [0.80; 1.57]). The results of this meta-analysis are in favor of the beneficial impact of pharmacological treatment of mild hypertension on both maternal and neonatal outcomes and without significant adverse events for the fetus.

Preventive Effect of Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cell Transplantation on Acute Myocardial Infarction-Induced Heart Failure: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

PURPOSE: Heart failure (HF) is a major complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Transplantation of bone marrow mononuclear cells (BM-MNC) in the setting of AMI has been proposed as a means for myocardial tissue regeneration. Several trials have explored the outcomes of these cells on surrogate end points such as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with AMI. However, the data regarding the clinical efficacy are infrequent. Here, we performed a meta-analysis investigating the effect of BM-MNCs injection on the rate of hospitalization for HF in the long-term follow-up period. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were queried with various combinations of keywords through May 2, 2022. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to calculate risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of hospitalization for HF, all-cause mortality, and stroke rate. Subgroup analyses for hospitalization based on time and cell dose were performed. RESULTS: A total of 2150 patients with AMI across 22 trials were included for quantitative synthesis. At long-term follow-up, AMI patients treated with an intracoronary injection of BM-MNCs were less likely to be hospitalized for heart failure compared to the control group receiving standard treatment (RR = 0.54, 95% CI = [0.37; 0.78], p = 0.002). There was no association between BM-MNC therapy and all-cause mortality (RR = 0.69, 95% CI = [0.47; 1.01], p = 0.05) and stroke (RR = 1.12, 95% CI= [0.24; 5.21], p = 0.85). CONCLUSION: Autologous injection of BM-MNC in the setting of AMI may be associated with decreased risk of hospitalization of heart failure in the long term. However, its effect on all-cause mortality and stroke rate is questionable.

Protective effects of Panax ginseng against doxorubicin-induced cardiac toxicity in patients with non-metastatic breast cancer: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Anthracycline-based chemotherapy increases the risk of cancer therapeutics-related cardiac dysfunction. Recently, evidences from in vitro experiments and animal studies have shown that ginsenosides may exert cardiovascular protection against cancer therapeutics-related cardiac dysfunction. Here, we aimed to evaluate this effect in a clinical situation. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, women with non-metastatic breast cancer whose left ventricular ejection fraction was ≥ 50% were randomly assigned in 1:1 ratio to receive ginseng (1 g/day) or placebo besides standard chemotherapy. Echocardiographic measurements were performed at baseline, after the fourth, and eighth chemotherapy cycles. High-sensitive cardiac troponin I was assessed at baseline and after the 4th cycle. The primary endpoint of the study was change in left ventricular ejection fraction. Cancer therapeutics-related cardiac dysfunction was defined as a drop in left ventricular ejection fraction of ≥ 10% from baseline. RESULTS: Results from 30 patients were included in the final analysis (15 patients in each group). In the intervention and control groups, left ventricular ejection fraction was dropped from 62.0 ± 0.9% to 60.7 ± 1.0% (difference = -1.3 ± 1.1%) and from 63.27 ± 1.1% to 58.0 ± 1.3% (difference = -5.27 ± 0.8%), respectively (difference = 3.97%, p = 0.006) at the end of the fourth cycle of chemotherapy. After the eighth cycle of chemotherapy, the mean left ventricular ejection fraction was increased by 0.8 ± 1.3% from baseline in the intervention group, whereas the placebo group experienced a reduction of -7.3 ± 1.4% (difference = 8.1%, p-value < 0.001). None of the patients in the ginseng group in comparison to 1(6.7%, p-value = 0.5) and 5 (33.3%, p-value = 0.02) patients in the placebo group developed cancer therapeutics-related cardiac dysfunction after the fourth and eighth cycles, respectively. High-sensitive cardiac troponin I levels were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic ginseng supplementation may protect against doxorubicin-induced early cancer therapeutics-related cardiac dysfunction and early decline in left ventricular ejection fraction in breast cancer patients.

Impacts of opium addiction on patterns of angiographic findings in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Opium is one of the most abused substances in the Middle East. The effects of opium use on coronary artery disease (CAD) are a matter of debate. This study aimed to assess the association between opium use and angiographic findings as well as the complexity of CAD in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) diagnosis. In this case-control study, all patients admitted for coronary angiography from 2019 to 2020 were evaluated. After applying the eligibility criteria, they were categorized into two groups opium and non-opium based on their history of opium use. Both groups were matched regarding the demographic features. The prevalence, location, and severity of obstruction of the vessels were compared between the non-opium and opium groups. The SYNTAX score was also calculated and compared between the two groups. The scores ≤ 22 are considered low risk and the higher scores are a non-low risk. P value < 0.05 is considered significant. A total of 170 patients with a mean age of 61.59 ± 9.07 years were finally enrolled in our study. Regarding the severity of vascular involvement, there was a significant difference between the non-opium and opium groups in LAD (P = 0.025), and PLV (P = 0.018) vessels. From the location points of view of obstructive coronary artery involved segments, only in the PDA (P = 0.006), and LCX (P = 0.004) vessels, a significant difference was observed. Moreover, 47.1% of opium and 30.6% of non-opium use group were in the non-low risk SYNTAX score classification which is a statistically significant difference between these two groups (P value = 0.048). Opium, as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, can have specific effects on angiographic findings in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Likewise, the complexity of CAD in opium users who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention is significantly higher.