Addressing Medication Administration Safety Through Simulation: A Quasi-Experimental Study Among Nursing Students.

Healthcare institutions are dedicated to minimizing medication errors and promoting their reporting. This study investigates the impact of simulation on nursing students' attitudes toward and intention to report medication errors. A quasi-experimental one-group pre-post-test study was conducted. Third-year nursing students (N = 63) participated in a scenario-based simulation for medication administration. Participants' errors were documented. Participants self-reported attitudes toward medication administration safety and intention to report errors. The most reported error was "contraindicated in disease" (61%). The simulation increased attitudes of preparedness by the training program received (p < 0.01) and belief in the patient's involvement in preventing errors (p < 0.01), and decreased the belief that professional incompetence reveals errors (p = 0.015). Intention to report errors was influenced by medication error training received (p = 0.045), confidence in error reporting (p < 0.001), and a sense of responsibility to disclose errors (p = 0.001). Simulation effectively shapes attitudes and intentions regarding medication error reporting. Improving nursing students' awareness, skills, and clinical judgment can foster a safety culture and potentially reduce patient harm. Future research should examine the long-term effects of simulation and its impact on reducing medication errors.

Determinants of physical activity habit formation: a theory-based qualitative study among young adults.

PURPOSE: Engagement in physical activity significantly contributes to reducing the onset and severity of chronic diseases. Nonetheless, establishing habits around this behaviour remains a persistent challenge. This research endeavours to discern the determinants influencing the formation of physical activity habit among young adults in Israel, drawing upon a socio-ecological model. METHODS: A qualitative approach with phenomenological-hermeneutical method was used. In-depth interviews were carried to cover four levels of the socio-ecological model. RESULTS: Interviewees were categorized into three subgroups according to their physical activity habit strength: Habitually physically active (n = 8), Variably physically active (n = 11), and physically inactive (n = 6). The content analysis yielded four overarching themes associated with physical activity habit formation. Intrapersonal determinants encompassed personal traits, perceptions and attitudes, perceived benefits, and emotional responses related to physical activity. Interpersonal determinants encompassed social support, modelling support, and peer pressure. Community determinants pertained to social norms, resource availability, and accessibility. Finally, public policy considerations encompassed educational policies as well as workplace policies and cultural influences. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the unique determinants contributing to the formation of physical activity habit. As intrapersonal and interpersonal factors are significant determinants, interventions should focus on these elements in order to promote this behaviour among young adults.

Effectiveness of a virtual program for OSCE preparation during COVID-19: a descriptive and repeated cross-sectional study among nursing students.

BACKGROUND: Despite the prevalence of distance learning during COVID-19, conducting clinical training for nursing students remains challenging. In compliance with social-distancing restrictions, a Zoom-based virtual OSCE preparation program for nursing students was designed, and it included clinical skills. The aims of this study were to assess nursing students' satisfaction with a virtual program for Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) preparation, and to evaluate its learning outcomes measured by OSCE scores as compared to those of in-person preparation programs. METHODS: A descriptive and repeated cross-sectional study was designed. Students' satisfaction with the virtual program was based on a post-course survey and personal reflections. OSCE scores of graduates of the virtual program (n = 82) tested in 2021 were compared to those of 337 graduates of in-person programs tested in 2017-2020. RESULTS: A post-program survey revealed that 88% of the students in 2021 were satisfied with the virtual program and felt it prepared them properly for the OSCE (26% agree and 62% strongly agree). No significant differences were found between OSCE scores following the virtual program conducted in 2021 and scores following in-person programs conducted in 2017-2020. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that nursing education can benefit from integrating virtual programs which incorporate clinical practices into the curricula, without harming student competency. The study results may address the problem of maintaining clinical practices in a time of limited accessibility, and in settings of low resources. It is important to expand the investigation to long-term impact of virtual training programs on nursing students' competencies.

Choosing a Nursing Career During a Global Health Event: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: Although in the past, the decision to enter the nursing profession was mainly due to intrinsic motives, more recent generations present additional extrinsic career choice motives. The motivation of choosing a nursing career may be affected by global health events, such as COVID-19. PURPOSE: To examine the motivation for choosing a nursing career during COVID-19. METHODS: A repeated cross-sectional study was conducted among 211 first-year nursing students at a university in Israel. A questionnaire was distributed during 2020 and 2021. Linear regression evaluated the motives that predict choosing a nursing career during COVID-19. RESULTS: Intrinsic motives were the leading motives for choosing a nursing career in a univariate analysis. A multivariate linear model revealed that choosing a nursing career during the pandemic was associated with extrinsic motives (ß= .265, P < .001). Intrinsic motives did not predict choosing a nursing career during COVID-19. CONCLUSION: Reassessment of motives among candidates may help the efforts of faculty and nursing to recruit and retain nurses in the profession.

The influence of simulated medication administration learning on the clinical performance of nursing students: A comparative quasi-experimental study.

BACKGROUND: Medication administration is a main role of nurses, and by mastering this skill, medication errors can be reduced. Simulation provides a safe environment for learning and improving medication administration. Simulation design may influence the students' learning curve and ability to transfer skills into the clinical setting. OBJECTIVE: To examine the influence of simulation-based learning of the medication administration process, on satisfaction, self-perception of preparedness, and clinical performance of students who practice simulation either individually or in a group. DESIGN: A comparative quasi-experimental study. SETTING: A public university in southern Israel. PARTICIPANTS: Third-year nursing students in two consecutive academic years (78 in the individual sample and 50 in the group sample). METHODS: Nursing students participated in a scenario-based simulation for medication administration either individually or in a group. Self-reported questionnaires evaluated participants' satisfaction with the simulation experience, and perception of preparedness before and after the simulation. Faculty members observed and evaluated participants' medication administration during the simulation and in the clinical setting. Paired t-tests were performed to compare preparedness before and after the simulation experience. Linear regression models were formulated to elicit the predictors of preparedness after simulation and evaluations for medication administration in the clinical setting. RESULTS: The simulation experience increased participants' preparedness both when designed for an individual student and for a group of students. Simulation performance was the main contributor to the participant preparedness among the individual sample (ß = 0.51, p < 0.01), whereas previous preparedness was the main contributor among the group sample (ß = 0.42, p < 0.01). The association between simulation performance and clinical performance was mediated by preparedness after simulation in the individual sample, but not in the group sample. CONCLUSIONS: Simulation improves students' preparedness for medication administration. Individual simulation also impacts clinical performance, via preparedness. Further research is needed to identify other factors that facilitate skills transfer into the clinical setting.

The effect of regulatory focus and time preference on the dual process of physical activity: A cross-sectional study among nurses.

AIMS: To examine the dual process of physical activity adoption among nurses and its relationships with two personal orientations-regulatory focus-the tendency to focus on promotion (vs. prevention) goals and time preference as measured by delay discounting: the tendency to overvalue immediate rewards over long-term ones. BACKGROUND: The dual process theory suggests that both conscious and non-conscious processes influence the adoption of physical activity. However, the role of regulatory focus and time preference in this process was not yet examined. DESIGN: A cross-sectional online survey among 143 nurses during August-November 2017. METHODS: Validated measures were used to estimate physical activity habit strength (a non-conscious process) and intention, planning and behaviour control (conscious processes), physical activity level, regulatory focus and time preference. Multivariable ordered logit and logistic models were specified to examine determinants of both processes. RESULTS: Promotion focus was positively associated with having a strong habit of physical activity among nurses with moderate-to-low activity levels, but it was negatively associated with habit for active nurses. As for time preference, higher delay discounting was negatively associated with nurses' conscious intention to adopt physical activity and with their action planning. CONCLUSION: Promotion focus and time preference are associated with both conscious and non-conscious processes of physical activity adoption among nurses and should be considered in future health promotion interventions targeted to this population. IMPACT: Promotion focus and time preference have a significant role in this dual process. Enhancing physical activity of health providers by adjusting the intervention to personal orientations may improve public health.

Impact of Simulation and Clinical Experience on Self-efficacy in Nursing Students: Intervention Study.

This study compared the effect of simulation and clinical experience timing on self-confidence/self-efficacy for the nursing process. Using a randomized, double-crossover design, self-efficacy was measured 3 times. Although self-efficacy was significantly higher at time 1 for students who had clinical experience, there was no difference between the groups at the end of the course (time 2). Thus, simulation increased self-confidence/self-efficacy equivalently if placed either before or after clinical experience.

Regulatory focus and adherence to self-care behaviors among adults with type 2 diabetes.

The aims of this study were, first, to test the association between regulatory focus of adults with type 2 diabetes and their adherence to two types of self-care behaviors - lifestyle change (e.g. physical activity and diet) and medical care regimens (blood-glucose monitoring, foot care and medication usage). Second, to explore whether a fit between the message framing and patients' regulatory focus would improve their intentions to adhere specifically when the type of behavior fits the patients' regulatory focus as well. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 130 adults with type 2 diabetes who were hospitalized in an academic medical center. The patients completed a set of questionnaires that included their diabetes self-care activities, regulatory focus, self-esteem and demographic, socioeconomic and clinical data. In addition, participants were exposed to either a gain-framed or a loss-framed message, and were then asked to indicate their intention to improve adherence to self-care behaviors. A multivariable linear regression model revealed that promoters reported higher adherence to lifestyle change behaviors than preventers did (B = .60, p = .028). However, no effect of regulatory focus on adherence to medical care regimens was found (B = .46, p = .114). In addition, preventers reported higher intentions to adhere to medical care behaviors when the message framing was congruent with prevention focus (B = 1.16, p = .023). However, promoters did not report higher intentions to adhere to lifestyle behaviors when the message framing was congruent with promotion focus (B = -.16, p = .765). These findings justify the need to develop tailor-made interventions that are adjusted to both patients' regulatory focus and type of health behavior.