Association Between Hispanic Ethnicity and Engagement in a Remote Postpartum Blood Pressure Monitoring Programs: Secondary Analysis of a Pilot Randomized Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Remote self-measured blood pressure (SMBP) programs improve racial health equity among postpartum people with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) who receive recommended blood pressure ascertainment after hospital discharge.1-3 However, as prior studies have been conducted within racially diverse but ethnically homogeneous populations,1-3 the effect of SMBP programs on ethnicity-based inequities is less understood.4 We examined whether SMBP rates differed among Hispanic versus non-Hispanic participants in remote SMBP programs. STUDY DESIGN: This is a planned secondary analysis of a RCT conducted among postpartum patients with HDP who were enrolled into our remote SMBP program, in which they obtain SMBP and then manually enter the SMBP value into a patient portal for individual provider response. In the parent trial, consenting patients were randomized to continued manual blood pressure entry of SMBP or use of a Bluetooth-enabled blood pressure cuff synched to a smartphone application utilizing artificial intelligence to respond to each obtained blood pressure or symptom for six weeks and to flag abnormalities for providers. Both SMBP programs were available in Spanish and English. For this study, women who self-reported their ethnicity were stratified into two ethnic groups - Hispanic and non-Hispanic - regardless of randomization group. Those who did not self-report ethnicity but completed all study procedures in Spanish were also categorized as Hispanic. Outcomes were the same in the parent study and this secondary analysis. The primary outcome was ≥1 SMBP assessment within 10 days postpartum. Secondary outcomes included number of blood pressure assessments and healthcare utilization outcomes (remote antihypertensive medication initiation or dose-increase and presentation to the Emergency Department or readmission for hypertension within 30 days of discharge). Participants rated their experience with SMBP via a scale from 0 (worst possible) to 10 (best possible) and the Decision Regret Scale, which assessed their regret in SMBP program participation (0=no regret; 100=high regret)).5 Outcomes were compared between groups. Risk differences (RD) were calculated for categorical and regression coefficients for continuous outcomes. The parent RCT was IRB-approved and published on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05595629) before enrollment. RESULTS: Among 119 women in the parent study, 83 (70%) self-reported ethnicity and the proportion of Hispanic people was similar in both treatment groups. This study compared 23 Hispanic (19% monolingual in Spanish) to 62 non-Hispanic women. Rates of SMBP assessment within 10 days postpartum was similar (Hispanic 64% vs non-Hispanic 79%; RD -0.1 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) -0.4, 0.1). There were no differences in mean number of remote SMBP assessments or rates of remote antihypertensive medication initiation or dose titration. The rates of hypertension-related presentations to the Emergency Department or hospital readmission were also similar between groups. Lastly, regardless of ethnicity, participants had low scores on the Decision Regret Scale and rated their experience with their remote SMBP program highly favorably. (See Table 1.) Conclusion: Hispanic and non-Hispanic postpartum patients with HDP had similar outcomes and favorable patient perceptions. The small sample size in this study may have produced inadequate power to detect a difference between study groups, thereby leading to Type II error. Thus, more research on Hispanic participants in remote SMBP programs is needed. However, the effect of remote SMBP programs on perinatal equity may not be limited to race-based disparities.

Implementation of In-Hospital Postpartum Glucose Tolerance Testing for People with Gestational Diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate uptake of the glucose tolerance test performed during delivery hospitalization as part of routine clinical care. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study of people with GDM at a tertiary center. We collected 9 months of postimplementation data after the in-hospital ("early") glucose tolerance test was adopted as a routine screening option. Adherence was compared between those who elected early glucose tolerance testing versus those who deferred testing to the standard postpartum period. Bivariable statistics including demographics, care team, and postpartum testing/visit attendance were compared between those who received early testing and those who did not using chi-square, Fisher's exact, and t-tests. RESULTS: A total of 681 patients with GDM delivered during the study period. Of those who had an early glucose tolerance test ordered (n = 408), 340 (83.3%) completed the test. Among those who did not complete an early glucose tolerance test (ordered and not completed or never ordered), only 104/341 (30.5%) completed any postpartum glucose testing in the first 12 months of postpartum. There were significant differences in characteristics in terms of race/ethnicity, insurance, type of gestational diabetes (A1GDM vs. A2GDM), diabetes medications, obstetric care provider, and delivery mode. Among those who completed early testing, 43.7% of participants had impaired glucose metabolism and 6.5% had values concerning for overt diabetes mellitus. Among those who deferred testing to the standard 6- to 12-week period, 24.0% had impaired glucose metabolism and none had overt diabetes. Those who completed an early glucose tolerance test had a lower rate of postpartum visit attendance compared with those who deferred (75.6 vs. 91.5%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: In this cohort, when the early glucose tolerance test is offered in clinical practice, adherence rates are higher than when the test is deferred until the postpartum visit. KEY POINTS: · Adherence rates with the early glucose tolerance test (GTT) are higher than if the testing is deferred.. · Those who completed an early GTT had a lower rate of postpartum visit attendance compared with those who deferred.. · Offering an in-hospital postpartum GTT can help address low rates of glucose testing postpartum..

Psyche: The 5th 'P' and its Associated Impact on the Second Stage of Labor.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with depression during labor display dysregulated patterns of oxytocin release and this may impact second stage of labor. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between maternal preconception and antenatal depressive disorders on the duration of second stage of labor and perinatal outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of patients enrolled in the Behavioral and Mood in Mothers, Behavior in Infants study who reached the second stage of labor. Participants were assigned to: pre-conception only major depressive disorder (MDD), prenatal major depressive disorder, and non-depressed controls. Primary outcome was prolonged second stage of labor. Secondary outcomes included perinatal morbidities. RESULTS: 172 patients were included. 24.4% (42/172) participants had preconception-only MDD, 42.4% (73/172) patients had prenatal MDD, and 33.1% (57/172) patients had as non-depressed controls. The adjusted pair-wise analysis between groups showed no significant difference in the duration of second stage. No statistically significant differences were noted between groups for adverse neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSION: Maternal depressive disorders did not impact length of second stage of labor or immediate perinatal outcomes.

Early-Pregnancy Resilience Characteristics Before Versus During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: Resilience is associated with mental and somatic health benefits. Given the social, physical, and mental health toll of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, we examined whether the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with population-level changes in resilience among pregnant people. STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a prospective cohort of nulliparous pregnant people <20 weeks' gestation from a single hospital. Participants completed baseline assessments of resilience characteristics, including dispositional optimism (DO), mindfulness, and proactive coping. For this analysis, participants recruited before the COVID-19 pandemic were compared with those recruited during the pandemic. The primary outcome was DO, assessed as a continuous score on the validated Revised Life Orientation Test. Secondary outcomes included continuous scores on mindfulness and proactive coping assessments. Bivariable analyses were completed using chi-squared and Mann-Whitney U tests. Multivariable linear regression compared resilience scores by recruitment time frame, controlling for confounders selected a priori: maternal age, education, and marital status. RESULTS: Of the 300 participants, 152 (50.7%) were recruited prior to the pandemic. Demographic and pregnancy characteristics differed between groups: the during-pandemic group was older, had higher levels of education, and were more likely to be married/partnered. There were no significant differences in any of the resilience characteristics before versus during the pandemic in bivariable or multivariable analyses. CONCLUSION: In this cohort, there were no differences in early pregnancy resilience characteristics before versus during the COVID-19 pandemic. This affirms that on a population level, resilience is a stable metric, even in the setting of a global pandemic. KEY POINTS: · Resilience is associated with mental and somatic health benefits.. · No difference in early-pregnancy resilience in those recruited before versus during the pandemic.. · Consistent with conceptualization of resilience as an innate characteristic..

The effect of digital health interventions on postpartum depression or anxiety: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the effect of digital health interventions compared with treatment as usual on preventing and treating postpartum depression and postpartum anxiety. DATA SOURCES: Searches were conducted in Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov. STUDY ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS: The systematic review included full-text randomized controlled trials comparing digital health interventions with treatment as usual for preventing or treating postpartum depression and postpartum anxiety. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Two authors independently screened all abstracts for eligibility and independently reviewed all potentially eligible full-text articles for inclusion. A third author screened abstracts and full-text articles as needed to determine eligibility in cases of discrepancy. The primary outcome was the score on the first ascertainment of postpartum depression or postpartum anxiety symptoms after the intervention. Secondary outcomes included screening positive for postpartum depression or postpartum anxiety --as defined in the primary study --and loss to follow-up, defined as the proportion of participants who completed the final study assessment compared with the number of initially randomized participants. For continuous outcomes, the Hedges method was used to obtain standardized mean differences when the studies used different psychometric scales, and weighted mean differences were calculated when studies used the same psychometric scales. For categorical outcomes, pooled relative risks were estimated. RESULTS: Of 921 studies originally identified, 31 randomized controlled trials-corresponding to 5532 participants randomized to digital health intervention and 5492 participants randomized to treatment as usual-were included. Compared with treatment as usual, digital health interventions significantly reduced mean scores ascertaining postpartum depression symptoms (29 studies: standardized mean difference, -0.64 [95% confidence interval, -0.88 to -0.40]; I2=94.4%) and postpartum anxiety symptoms (17 studies: standardized mean difference, -0.49 [95% confidence interval, -0.72 to -0.25]; I2=84.6%). In the few studies that assessed screen-positive rates for postpartum depression (n=4) or postpartum anxiety (n=1), there were no significant differences between those randomized to digital health intervention and treatment as usual. Overall, those randomized to digital health intervention had 38% increased risk of not completing the final study assessment compared with those randomized to treatment as usual (pooled relative risk, 1.38 [95% confidence interval, 1.18-1.62]), but those randomized to app-based digital health intervention had similar loss-to-follow-up rates as those randomized to treatment as usual (relative risk, 1.04 [95% confidence interval, 0.91-1.19]). CONCLUSION: Digital health interventions modestly, but significantly, reduced scores assessing postpartum depression and postpartum anxiety symptoms. More research is needed to identify digital health interventions that effectively prevent or treat postpartum depression and postpartum anxiety but encourage ongoing engagement throughout the study period.

Association between nonbirthing parent's perinatal education and mental health support desires and perinatal anxiety among either parent.

BACKGROUND: Although perinatal anxiety is common in birthing and nonbirthing parents, little is known about the mental health or educational needs of nonbirthing parents during the perinatal period and whether perinatal anxiety in the birthing parent is associated with nonbirthing parent educational preferences. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the desired digital perinatal educational preferences of nonbirthing parents and whether these preferences differed by (1) endorsement of high parenthood-related anxiety in the nonbirthing partner and (2) mental health of the birthing parent (including both identified mental health conditions and presence of pregnancy-related anxiety). STUDY DESIGN: In this cross-sectional study, nonbirthing and birthing parents using Maven, a digital perinatal health platform, selected the areas in which they wanted education or support from a list of options. In addition, the participants reported their experience of parenthood or pregnancy-related anxiety through a 5-item Likert scale in response to the prompt, "On a scale of 1 (not at all) to 5 (extremely), how anxious are you feeling about parenthood or pregnancy?" High parenthood or pregnancy-related anxiety was defined as being very (scale: 4) or extremely (scale: 5) anxious. Furthermore, birthing parents reported whether they had a current or previous mood disorder, but this information was not reported by nonbirthing parents. Survey responses for birthing and nonbirthing parents were linked through the digital platform. Descriptive analyses were used to assess nonbirthing parent demographics and perinatal support interests, stratified by high parenthood-related anxiety, high pregnancy-related anxiety in their partner, and perinatal mood disorders or high pregnancy-related anxiety in their partner. RESULTS: Among 382 nonbirthing parents, most (85.6%) desired to receive digital support during their partner's pregnancy: the most commonly endorsed support interests were infant care (327 [85.6%]) and understanding their partner's emotional (313 [81.9%]) or physical (294 [77.0%]) experience during pregnancy. Overall, 355 nonbirthing parents (93.9%) endorsed any parenthood-related anxiety, and 63 nonbirthing parents (16.5%) were categorized as having high parenthood-related anxiety. Those with high parenthood-related anxiety were more likely to desire digital support for each topic. Among birthing parents, 124 (32.4%) had a mental health condition, and 45 (11.8%) had high pregnancy-related anxiety. When nonbirthing parents were stratified by the presence of their partner having a mental health condition or high pregnancy-related anxiety alone, no difference in desired perinatal education was identified. Although nonbirthing parents had higher rates of high parenthood-related anxiety if the birthing parent reported high pregnancy anxiety (17 [27.0%] vs 28 [8.8%]; P<.001), no difference was found with other conditions within the mental health composite. CONCLUSION: In this cross-sectional study, many nonbirthing parents who engaged with a perinatal digital platform desired education on their or their partner's emotional health during the perinatal period, and most endorsed parenthood-related anxiety. Our findings suggest that perinatal mental health support is needed for nearly all parents and that nonbirthing parents who use digital health platforms are amenable to receiving comprehensive perinatal education via these platforms.

The relationship between body mass index and perceived control over labor.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with an increased body mass index (BMI) (≥ 30 kg/m2) experience higher rates of perinatal mental health disorders than individuals with BMI < 30. Personal experience of decreased control over labor has been associated with the development postpartum mood and anxiety disorders. However, no studies have investigated the association between BMI and experience of control over labor. This study aimed to assess perceived control over labor and compare patients with BMI ≥ 30 to those with BMI < 30. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional study of postpartum patients who delivered at term (37-41 weeks gestation). Postpartum, participants completed the Labour Agentry Scale (LAS), a validated tool to assess perceived control over labor/birth. Demographic, maternal health history and obstetric/neonatal outcomes were abstracted from the patient chart. Bivariate analyses were performed between those with BMI < 30 and those with BMI ≥ 30 using Fisher's exact test. Continuous LAS scores were compared between patients with BMI < 30 and BMI ≥ 30 using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Higher LAS scores indicate higher perceived control over labor. Multivariable linear regression was then performed to account for confounding factors identified a priori. RESULTS: There was no difference in LAS between those with BMI ≥ 30 and BMI < 30. When stratified by World Health Organization (WHO) class of BMI, those with BMI ≥ 40 had a significantly lower LAS scores than those with BMI < 30 (147 vs. 163, p = 0.02), however, this finding was no longer significant after controlling for length of labor and cesarean birth. CONCLUSION: Only participants with the highest BMI experienced decreased control over labor, and this finding was no longer significant after controlling for mode of delivery and length of labor. Further research into the experience of birthing people with BMI ≥ 30 is critical to understand the increased risk of perinatal mood disorders among this population.

Neonatal and Maternal Outcomes of Pregnancies following Stillbirth.

OBJECTIVE: Prior stillbirth increases risk of subsequent stillbirth but has unclear effect on subsequent liveborn pregnancies. We examined associations between prior stillbirth, adverse neonatal outcomes, and maternal morbidity in subsequent liveborn pregnancies. STUDY DESIGN: This is a secondary analysis of a large, National Institutes of Health-funded retrospective cohort study of parturients who delivered a singleton infant at a tertiary-care hospital from January 2002 to March 2013 and had a past medical/obstetric history of diabetic, and/or hypertensive disorders, and/or pregnancy with fetal growth restriction. Our analysis included all multiparous patients from the parent study. The primary outcome was a neonatal morbidity composite (neonatal resuscitation, neonatal birth injury, respiratory distress syndrome, transient tachypnea of the newborn, hypoglycemia, sepsis). Secondary outcomes included a maternal morbidity composite (venous thromboembolism, intensive care unit admission, disseminated intravascular coagulation, sepsis, hysterectomy, pulmonary edema, renal failure, blood transfusion), other maternal/delivery complications, and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. Outcomes were compared between those with versus without prior stillbirth. Negative binomial regression controlled for maternal comorbidities and delivery year. RESULTS: Among 171 and 5,245 multiparous parturients with versus without prior stillbirth, respectively, those with prior stillbirth had higher rates of pregestational diabetes, autoimmune disease, and clotting disorders. After controlling for these differences and delivery year, infants of parturients with prior stillbirth had similar risk of composite neonatal morbidity (adjusted relative ratio [aRR] 1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99-1.45) but higher risk of NICU admission (aRR 1.42; 95% CI 1.06-1.91) compared with infants of parturients without prior stillbirth, despite delivering at similar gestational ages. Multiparous patients with prior stillbirth had equal maternal morbidity risk but higher risk of developing preeclampsia with severe features (aRR 2.11; 95% CI 1.19-3.72). CONCLUSION: Compared with high-risk multiparous patients without prior stillbirth, those with prior stillbirth have higher risk of NICU admission and preeclampsia with severe features. KEY POINTS: · Prior stillbirth increases risk in subsequent livebirth for NICU admission and neonatal morbidity.. · Prior stillbirth increased the risk of severe preeclampsia for mothers in subsequent livebirth.. · Additional monitoring of pregnancies of patients with prior history of demise may be warranted..

Early pregnancy dispositional optimism and pregnancy outcomes among nulliparous people.

BACKGROUND: Dispositional optimism, the expectation of positive outcomes after personal challenges, is a resilience factor associated with widespread health benefits. However, the data on pregnancy-related outcomes are more limited. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the association of early pregnancy dispositional optimism with adverse perinatal outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective cohort study completed between May 2019 and February 2022 at a single, large tertiary medical center. Nulliparous pregnant people were recruited from outpatient obstetrical care sites. Participants completed a validated assessment of dispositional optimism at <20 weeks of gestation and were followed up until delivery. The primary outcome was an adverse maternal outcome composite that included gestational diabetes mellitus, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and/or cesarean delivery. The secondary outcomes included individual composite components and a neonatal morbidity composite. Bivariate analyses compared characteristics and primary and secondary outcomes by dispositional optimism score quartile. Multivariable logistic regression compared outcomes by dispositional optimism score quartile with the highest quartile serving as the referent, controlling for confounders determined a priori. RESULTS: Overall, 491 pregnant people were approached for participation, and 135 pregnant people (27.5%) declined participation. Among the 284 individuals who enrolled and had complete outcome data, the median dispositional optimism score was 16.0 (interquartile range, 14-18), and 47.9% of individuals experienced at least 1 adverse maternal outcome 135 (47.9%). After adjusting for confounders, the odds of adverse maternal outcomes were significantly higher in the lowest 2 optimism quartiles: quartile 1 (adjusted odds ratio, 3.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.57-7.36) and quartile 2 (adjusted odds ratio, 2.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-4.79) than the highest quartile. This was driven by significantly higher rates of hypertension (quartile 1: adjusted odds ratio, 2.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-6.29) and cesarean delivery (quartile 1: adjusted odds ratio, 2.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.20-6.55). There was no difference noted when quartile 3 was compared with quartile 4. CONCLUSION: Lower early pregnancy dispositional optimism was associated with significantly higher odds of adverse maternal outcomes. Interventions targeting improvements in optimism may be a novel mechanism for reducing perinatal morbidity.

Body Mass Index and Perceived Labor Control: Could weight stigma explain differences in birth experience?

Background: Individuals with a body mass index (BMI) of ≥ 30 kg/m2 experience weight stigma when interacting with the healthcare system. There is limited data on how weight stigma impacts patient's experience of obstetric care. This study aims to assess perceived control over the birth process and compare patients with BMI ≥ 30 to those with BMI < 30. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional study of term patients. Postpartum, participants completed the Labour Agentry Scale (LAS), a validated tool to assess perceived control over labor/birth. Continuous LAS scores were compared between patients with BMI < 30 and BMI ≥ 30. Results: There was no difference in LAS between those with BMI ≥ 30 and BMI < 30. When stratified by World Health Organization (WHO) class of BMI, those with BMI ≥ 40 had a significantly lower LAS scores than those with BMI < 30 (147 vs. 163, p = 0.02), however, this finding was no longer significant after controlling for length of labor and cesarean birth. Conclusion: Only participants with the highest BMI experienced decreased control over labor, and this finding was no longer significant after controlling for mode of delivery and length of labor. Further research is necessary into how weight stigma influences birthing people's experience.

Identifying risk of stillbirth using machine learning.

BACKGROUND: Previous predictive models using logistic regression for stillbirth do not leverage the advanced and nuanced techniques involved in sophisticated machine learning methods, such as modeling nonlinear relationships between outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to create and refine machine learning models for predicting stillbirth using data available before viability (22-24 weeks) and throughout pregnancy, as well as demographic, medical, and prenatal visit data, including ultrasound and fetal genetics. STUDY DESIGN: This is a secondary analysis of the Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network, which included data from pregnancies resulting in stillborn and live-born infants delivered at 59 hospitals in 5 diverse regions across the United States from 2006 to 2009. The primary aim was the creation of a model for predicting stillbirth using data available before viability. Secondary aims included refining models with variables available throughout pregnancy and determining variable importance. RESULTS: Among 3000 live births and 982 stillbirths, 101 variables of interest were identified. Of the models incorporating data available before viability, the random forests model had 85.1% accuracy (area under the curve) and high sensitivity (88.6%), specificity (85.3%), positive predictive value (85.3%), and negative predictive value (84.8%). A random forests model using data collected throughout pregnancy resulted in accuracy of 85.0%; this model had 92.2% sensitivity, 77.9% specificity, 84.7% positive predictive value, and 88.3% negative predictive value. Important variables in the previability model included previous stillbirth, minority race, gestational age at the earliest prenatal visit and ultrasound, and second-trimester serum screening. CONCLUSION: Applying advanced machine learning techniques to a comprehensive database of stillbirths and live births with unique and clinically relevant variables resulted in an algorithm that could accurately identify 85% of pregnancies that would result in stillbirth, before they reached viability. Once validated in representative databases reflective of the US birthing population and then prospectively, these models may provide effective risk stratification and clinical decision-making support to better identify and monitor those at risk of stillbirth.

Unplanned Operative Delivery is Associated with Decreased Perception of Control over Labor.

Background: Unplanned operative delivery is associated with postpartum depression (PPD), but the mechanism is unknown. We aimed to assess the sense of control over labor for those who had unplanned delivery (unplanned cesarean or operative vaginal delivery: uCD/OVD) versus spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD). Methods: Secondary analysis of a cross-sectional survey study of term patients admitted for delivery at a tertiary center. After delivery, patients completed the Labour Agentry Scale (LAS), a validated tool to assess perceived control over labor and birth. Demographics, obstetric and neonatal outcomes and LAS scores were compared between patients who underwent uCD/OVD versus SVD. Multivariable logistic regression to assess the relationship between uCD/OVD and LAS score controlling for confounders that differed in the bivariate analysis. Results: Of the 149 patients, 50 (33.6%) underwent uCD/OVD. There were no differences in maternal age, race/ethnicity, insurance status or education level between those who had uCD/OVD versus SVD. Patients who had uCD/OVD had higher median body mass index (BMI) than those who had SVD (33.2 vs 30.1 kg/m2, p = 0.03). There were no differences in rate of medical or psychiatric morbidity between groups. Additionally, there were no differences in reason for admission, however those who had uCD/OVD had significantly longer times to delivery than those who underwent SVD (22 vs 14 hrs, p < 0.01). Gestational age at delivery was also significantly higher for those who underwent uCD/OVD compared to SVD (40.2 vs 39.6 wks, p = 0.02). For the primary outcome, LAS scores were lower for those who underwent uCD/OVD compared to SVD (146 vs. 164, p < 0.01). This remained significant even after controlling for length of labor, BMI and gestational age at delivery (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Even after accounting for length of labor, uCD/OVD is associated with a reduction in perceived control over labor, which may mediate the known increased risk of PPD. Further qualitative research is needed to examine how to better support patients' wellbeing after uCD/OVD.

The Association of Perceived Labor Agentry and Depression and/or Anxiety.

OBJECTIVE: Pregnancies complicated by perinatal mood disorders or a history of mental health disorder are at increased risk for complications including postpartum depression/anxiety. Patients' perceived control over childbirth is known to be an important factor for development of postpartum depression/anxiety. It is unclear whether women with preexisting and/or current depression and/or anxiety have different perceptions of control during childbirth compared with those without these comorbidities. This study aimed to evaluate the association between a current and/or prior diagnosis of depression and/or anxiety and scores on the Labour Agentry Scale (LAS), a validated tool evaluating patient's experience of control over their labor and delivery. STUDY DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional study of nulliparous patients admitted at term to a single center. Participants completed the LAS after delivery. A trained researcher performed detailed chart reviews for all participants. Participants were identified as having a current or historical diagnosis of depression/anxiety by self-report confirmed by chart review. Scores on the LAS were compared between those with versus without a diagnosis of depression/anxiety prior to admission for delivery. RESULTS: A total of 73 (44.8%) of the 149 participants held a current and/or prior diagnosis of depression and/or anxiety. Baseline demographics were similar between those with and without depression/anxiety. Mean scores on the LAS (range: 91-201) were significantly lower for those with depression/anxiety than those without a prior diagnosis (150.0 vs. 160.5, p < 0.01). Even after controlling for mode of delivery, admission indication, anesthesia, and Foley balloon usage, participants with anxiety and depression had scores that were on average 10.4 points lower on the LAS (95% confidence interval: -19.25, -1.62). CONCLUSION: Participants with a current and/or prior diagnosis of depression and/or anxiety scored lower on the LAS as compared with those without psychiatric diagnoses. Patients with psychiatric diagnoses may benefit from increased education and support during childbirth. KEY POINTS: · Control over childbirth is an important factor in the development of postpartum depression/anxiety.. · Patients with a prior or current diagnosis of anxiety and depression have lower labor agentry scores.. · These differences remained significant even when controlling for confounders such as delivery mode..

Perinatal Mental Health Disorders: A Review of Lessons Learned from Obstetric Care Settings.

Perinatal mental health has garnered significant attention within obstetrics over the last couple of decades as the long- and short-term morbidities of untreated perinatal mental health disorders on both the mother and fetus/neonate have become increasingly apparent. There have been major strides in increasing screening for perinatal mental health disorders, clinician comfort with prescribing common psychiatric medications, and integrating mental health professionals into prenatal care via health services approaches such as the collaborative care model. Despite these advances, however, gaps still remain in the tools used for screening and diagnosis, obstetric clinician training in diagnosis and management of perinatal mood and anxiety disorders, as well as patient access to mental health care during pregnancy and especially postpartum. Herein we review the state of perinatal mental health from the perspective of the obstetric provider and identify areas of ongoing innovation.

Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic brought about many social, psychological, and economic changes. We sought to compare pregnancy and birth outcomes immediately preceding the COVID-19 lockdown to those 12 months later. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of people giving birth at a large-volume tertiary medical center in Rhode Island. We compared those who gave birth in February 2020 to those in February 2021.  Results: Fewer people delivered in 2021 than 2020 (562 vs. 655). There was a non-significant decrease in the number of primary cesarean deliveries from 2020 to 2021. Insurance status modified this effect as there was a significant decrease in the number of patients with private insurance undergoing primary cesarean (63.6 vs 36.4%, p=0.004). Neonatal complications significantly decreased (55.4% vs 47.4%, p=0.006). CONCLUSION: There were differences in sociodemographic characteristics and outcomes of birthing people between 2020 and 2021. The socioeconomic and healthcare landscape caused by COVID-19 altered statewide birthing patterns.

Third-Grade Educational Outcomes of the Children of Adolescent Women.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate third-grade reading and math proficiency for children born to adolescent women compared with those born to non-adolescent women. METHODS: A statewide, retrospective cohort study was conducted in Rhode Island using third-grade year-end examination data from 2014 to 2017 as part of a statewide initiative to improve third grade reading levels. Children's third-grade reading and math proficiencies were compared between those born to nulliparous adolescent women (age 15-19 at the time of delivery), and nulliparous women 20 years or older at delivery. Bivariate analyses were conducted to compare maternal and child characteristics between adolescent and non-adolescent groups. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association between having an adolescent mother and being proficient in reading and math after adjusting for lunch subsidy, core city residence, child race/ethnicity and sex. RESULTS: Of the 8,248 children meeting the inclusion criteria, 20% were born to adolescent women and the remaining 80% were born to non-adolescent women. After adjusting for potential confounders, children born to adolescent women were significantly less likely to be proficient in both reading (adjusted risk ratio (aRR) 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.71-0.83) and math (aRR 0.78, 95% CI: 0.72-0.85). CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: Children born to adolescent women had significantly lower rates of reading and math proficiency when compared with children of non-adolescent women. These children may benefit from additional resources focused on early academic performance in order to address disparities in reading and math proficiency.