RESUMEN
Sacubitril/valsartan is a drug commonly prescribed for the management of hypertension. However, the complete understanding of its efficacy and safety as an antihypertensive agent remains a subject of ongoing investigation. To address this gap, a meta-analysis was conducted to assess and compare the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan in relation to olmesartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB). A thorough search of PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases was performed to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that could contribute to this meta-analysis. The selected studies were evaluated for their efficacy and safety parameters, including mean sitting and ambulatory blood pressure measurements, common side effects, adverse events, and drug discontinuation rates. A total of eight studies, involving 4488 hypertensive patients, were included in this analysis. Among the participants, 63.5% were administered sacubitril/valsartan, while 36.5% received olmesartan. The analysis revealed significant changes in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (MsSBP), mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (MsDBP), and mean sitting pulse pressure (MsPP) favoring sacubitril/valsartan, with p-values <0.00001, 0.07, and <0.00001, respectively. Additionally, sacubitril/valsartan demonstrated a significant reduction in mean ambulatory systolic blood pressure (MaSBP), mean ambulatory diastolic blood pressure (MaDBP), and mean ambulatory pulse pressure (MaPP) with p-values of 0.001, 0.001, and 0.02, respectively. However, it is important to note that safety outcomes indicated that sacubitril/valsartan was associated with slightly less favorable results compared to olmesartan. This meta-analysis highlights that sacubitril/valsartan exhibits superior efficacy in reducing blood pressure parameters compared to olmesartan in hypertensive patients. Nevertheless, its safety profile appears to be slightly less favorable. To reinforce these findings and provide more robust evidence, further studies with larger sample sizes should be conducted in the future. This comprehensive review serves as a valuable resource for healthcare professionals and researchers seeking to make informed decisions regarding antihypertensive treatment options.
RESUMEN
Introduction Diabetic foot ulcers are a pressing complication of diabetes mellitus. Wound care requires a significant proportion of healthcare resources. It is imperative, therefore, for healthcare professionals to possess sound knowledge of the disease along with a positive attitude to ensure better clinical practice. Our literature search revealed a scarcity of data pertaining to diabetic foot ulcers. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the knowledge and attitudes of nurses regarding diabetic foot care. Methods A cross-sectional study design was employed, a pre-validated and pre-tested questionnaire was used to collect data from a sample size of 250 nurses working at two tertiary care hospitals in Karachi, Pakistan. The study was conducted over a period of three months (January to March 2018) and included all nurses who possessed at least one year of clinical experience in diabetic ulcer care. The statistical software employed was SPSS version 19 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, US). Non-parametric tests and descriptive statistics were used for data analysis and statistical significance was assumed at a p-value of less than 0.5. Results Only 54% of the nurses in our study possessed adequate knowledge of diabetic foot ulcers. The mean score of knowledge was 74.9 (±9.5). Macdonald's standard criteria for learning outcomes was used to gauge the knowledge levels of our study population. Nurses performed best in the domain of ulcer care with 65.3% of the participants possessing good knowledge of the topic. The overall attitude of nurses towards patients with diabetic ulcers was positive. Conclusion This study highlights important gaps in nurses' knowledge and sheds light on the lack of evidence-based practice. Poor knowledge can compromise healthcare standards, even with the presence of positive attitudes. Hence, a comprehensive revision of nursing curricula across local tertiary hospitals for allowing nurses to update their knowledge is warranted.
RESUMEN
Background In developing countries like Pakistan, treatment is mediated by private and public healthcare setups with a limited budget for health facilities. Moreover, the inappropriate use of treadmill tests imposes a burden on healthcare resources and leads to unwarranted interventions. Our aim is to assess the prevalence and predictors of inappropriate referrals for the exercise tolerance test (ETT) to diagnose coronary artery disease (CAD) while taking public and private healthcare settings into consideration. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted to find the prevalence of the inappropriate use of ETT to diagnose obstructive CAD and to determine the factors responsible for it. A total of 264 patients were enrolled from outpatient departments in Karachi. The inclusion criterion was the referral of treadmill testing for the diagnosis of CAT. The analysis was performed by logistic regression models to ascertain independent predictors of inappropriate use. Results Exercise stress tests were found to be inappropriate in 209 (79%) patients. The study indicated that the majority of patients had a low or very low pre-test probability of CAD. Diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia were less frequent in the inappropriate as compared to the appropriate referrals (10%, 45%, and 16% versus 20%, 69%, and 32%). Both public and private sectors showed a high prevalence of inappropriate testing, but it was much higher in the latter (27% versus 73%, P < 0.001). In all regression models, the private healthcare system was the major independent predictor for inappropriate indications of ETT with an average odds ratio of 4.9 (P < 0.001). Conclusion The high prevalence of ETT referrals was found for the diagnosis of CAD. This result was consistent with both public and private healthcare systems, but it was considerably higher in private setups. Comorbidities, number of risk factors, and cardiovascular risk were not associated with the inappropriate use of ETT.