Permanent tattooing has no impact on local sweat rate, sweat sodium concentration and skin temperature or prediction of whole-body sweat sodium concentration during moderate-intensity cycling in a warm environment.

PURPOSES: This study investigated the impact of permanently tattooed skin on local sweat rate, sweat sodium concentration and skin temperature and determined whether tattoos alter the relationship between local and whole-body sweat sodium concentration. METHODS: Thirteen tattooed men (27 ± 6 years) completed a 1 h (66 ± 4% of [Formula: see text]) cycling trial at 32 °C, 35% relative humidity. Sweat rate and sweat sodium concentration were measured using the whole-body washdown and local absorbent patch techniques. Patches and skin-temperature probes were applied over the right/left thighs and tattooed/non-tattooed (contralateral) regions. RESULTS: Local sweat rates did not differ (p > 0.05) between the right (1.11 ± 0.38) and left (1.21 ± 0.37) thighs and the permanently tattooed (1.93 ± 0.82) and non-tattooed (1.72 ± 0.81 mg cm-2 min-1) regions. There were no differences in local sweat sodium concentration between the right (58.2 ± 19.4) and left (55.4 ± 20.3) thighs and the permanently tattooed (73.0 ± 22.9) and non-tattooed (70.2 ± 18.9 mmol L-1) regions. Difference in local skin temperature between the right and left thighs (- 0.043) was similar to that between the permanently tattooed and non-tattooed (- 0.023 °C) regions. Prediction of whole-body sweat sodium concentration for the permanently tattooed (41.0 ± 6.7) and the non-tattooed (40.2 ± 5.3 mmol L-1) regions did not differ. CONCLUSION: Permanent tattoos do not alter local sweat rate, sweat sodium concentration or local skin temperature during moderate-intensity cycling exercise in a warm environment. Results from a patch placed over a tattooed surface correctly predicts whole-body sweat sodium concentration from an equation developed from a non-tattooed region.

Effect of Thirst-Driven Fluid Intake on 1 H Cycling Time-Trial Performance in Trained Endurance Athletes.

A meta-analysis demonstrated that programmed fluid intake (PFI) aimed at fully replacing sweat losses during a 1 h high-intensity cycling exercise impairs performance compared with no fluid intake (NFI). It was reported that thirst-driven fluid intake (TDFI) may optimize cycling performance, compared with when fluid is consumed more than thirst dictates. However, how TDFI, compared with PFI and NFI, impacts performance during a 1 h cycling time-trial performance remains unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of NFI, TDFI and PFI on 1 h cycling time-trial performance. Using a randomized, crossover and counterbalanced protocol, 9 (7 males and 2 females) trained endurance athletes (30 ± 9 years; Peak V · O2∶ 59 ± 8 mL·kg-1·min-1) completed three 1 h cycling time-trials (30 °C, 50% RH) with either NFI, TDFI or PFI designed to maintain body mass (BM) at ~0.5% of pre-exercise BM. Body mass loss reached 2.9 ± 0.4, 2.2 ± 0.3 and 0.6 ± 0.2% with NFI, TDFI and PFI, respectively. Heart rate, rectal and mean skin temperatures and ratings of perceived exertion and of abdominal discomfort diverged marginally among trials. Mean distance completed (NFI: 35.6 ± 1.9 km; TDFI: 35.8 ± 2.0; PFI: 35.7 ± 2.0) and, hence, average power output maintained during the time-trials did not significantly differ among trials, and the impact of both PFI and TDFI vs. NFI was deemed trivial or unclear. These findings indicate that neither PFI nor TDFI are likely to offer any advantage over NFI during a 1 h cycling time-trial.

The Impact of an Ice Slurry-Induced Gastrointestinal Heat Sink on Gastrointestinal and Rectal Temperatures Following Exercise.

Gastrointestinal temperature (Tgint) measurement with a telemetric pill (TP) is increasingly used in exercise science. Contact of cool water with a TP invalidates Tgint assessment. However, what effect a heat sink created in the proximity of a TP may have on the assessment of Tgint remains unknown. We examined the impact of an ice slurry-induced heat sink on Tgint and rectal temperature (Trec) following exercise. After 20 min of seating (20-22 °C, 25-40% relative humidity (RH)), 11 men completed two intersperse exercise periods (31-32 °C, 35% RH) at 75-80% of estimated maximal heart rate until a Trec increase of 1 °C above baseline level. Following the first exercise period, participants were seated for 45 min and ingested 7.5 g·kg-1 of thermoneutral water, whereas, following the second period, they ingested 7.5 g·kg-1 of ice slurry. Both Tgint and Trec were measured continuously. The TPs were swallowed 10 h prior to the experiments. A bias ≤0.27 °C was taken as an indication that Tgint and Trec provided similar core temperature indices. Mean biases and 95% limits of agreement during passive sitting, first exercise, water ingestion, second exercise, and ice slurry ingestion periods were 0.16 ± 0.53, 0.13 ± 0.41, 0.21 ± 0.70, 0.17 ± 0.50, and 0.18 ± 0.66 °C, respectively. The rates of decrease in Tgint and Trec did not differ between the water and ice slurry ingestion periods. Our results indicate that ice slurry ingestion following exercise does not impact TP-derived assessment of Tgint compared with Trec.

Wireless measurement of rectal temperature during exercise: Comparing an ingestible thermometric telemetric pill used as a suppository against a conventional rectal probe.

Wireless measurement of rectal temperature during exercise may circumvent some limitations associated with the use of a conventional wired probe. We determined, for the first time, whether temperatures provided in vivo by wireless ingestible thermometric telemetric pills and a rectal probe compare favorably under conditions producing slow and rapid increases and decreases in rectal temperature. While wearing a rectal probe linked to a wireless ingestible thermometric telemetric pill, 13 participants completed the following phases: 1) 30 min sitting; 2) 45 min passive heat exposure (40-42 °C); 3) 45 min sitting while ingesting 7.5 g of ice slurry · kg body mass-1; 4) running exercise (38 °C) at 68% V˙O2max until a 39.5 °C increase in rectal probe temperature and; 5) cold-water (10 °C) immersion until a 1.5 °C decrease in rectal probe temperature. Acceptable differences between devices were taken as ≤ 0.3 °C. Mean differences within phases were all < 0.3 °C, whereas 95% limits of agreement ranged from ±0.2 °C to ±0.4 °C, coefficient of variations from ±0.3% to ±0.6% and typical error of measurements from ±0.1 °C to ±0.2°. Of the 14881 rectal temperature values measured over the experiment with the wireless ingestible thermometric telemetric pills and rectal probe, 91% of the differences between devices were found to be ≤ 0.3 °C. Results suggest that rectal temperatures provided by a wireless ingestible thermometric telemetric pill used as a suppository agree with those of a conventional wired probe. Hence, rectal temperature can reliably be measured using a wireless ingestible thermometric telemetric pill as a suppository.