A Phase 1a/1b Dose Escalation/Expansion Study of the Anti-PD-1 Monoclonal Antibody Nofazinlimab in Chinese Patients with Solid Tumors or Lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint blockade with anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) antibodies has demonstrated efficacy in multiple tumor types. Nofazinlimab is a humanized rat antibody targeting PD-1. A first-in-human study of nofazinlimab conducted in Australia found no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was not reached in the range of 1-10 mg/kg. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated nofazinlimab for multiple advanced malignancies in Chinese patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a phase 1a/1b, open-label, multicenter, dose-escalation/expansion trial. In phase 1a, patients received an abbreviated dose escalation of nofazinlimab at 60 mg and 200 mg every 3 weeks (Q3W) to determine DLTs and the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). In phase 1b, patients received the RP2D (monotherapy/combination) in six arms by tumor type; DLTs were evaluated for nofazinlimab plus lenvatinib in the unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) arm. Safety (continuously monitored in patients who received nofazinlimab) and efficacy (patients with measurable baseline disease) were assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 107 patients were eligible and received nofazinlimab. In phase 1a, no DLTs were observed; the RP2D was 200mg Q3W. In phase 1b, no DLTs were observed with nofazinlimab plus lenvatinib. The safety profile was consistent with that observed in the first-in-human study (NCT03475251). In phase 1b, 21/88 (23.9%) patients achieved confirmed objective responses, 26 (29.5%) had stable disease, and 9/20 (45.0%) patients with uHCC achieved confirmed objective responses to nofazinlimab plus lenvatinib. CONCLUSIONS: Nofazinlimab was well tolerated in Chinese patients. Preliminary efficacy was encouraging, particularly for nofazinlimab plus lenvatinib in uHCC, which is being studied in an ongoing phase 3 trial. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03809767; registered 18 January 2019.

A spatiotemporal comparative analysis on tumor immune microenvironment characteristics between neoadjuvant chemotherapy and preoperative immunotherapy for ESCC.

The average five-year survival rate for esophageal cancer, a common malignant tumor of the digestive system, is barely 20%. The majority of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients had already progressed to a locally advanced or even advanced stage at initial diagnosis, making routine surgery ineffective. Chemotherapy and immunotherapy are important neoadjuvant treatments for ESCC, however, it remains unknown how treatment will affect the immunological microenvironment, especially at the spatial level. Here, we presented the TME characters of ESCC from the temporal and spatial dimensions using scRNA-seq and ST, investigated the changes of immune cell clusters in the TME under neoadjuvant chemotherapy and preoperative immunotherapy, and explored the potential mechanisms. It was found that compared with chemotherapy, immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy increased the level of T cell proliferation, partially restored the function of exhausted T cells, induced the expansion of specific exhausted CD8 T cells, increased the production of dendritic cells (DCs), and supported the immune hot microenvironment of the tumor. We also found that CD52 and ID3 have potential as biomarkers of ESCC. Particularly, CD52 may be served as a predictor of the efficacy to screen the advantaged population of different regimens. Through multiple pathways, CAF2 and CAF5's antigen-presenting role affected the other fibroblast clusters, resulting in malignant transformation. We analyzed the immune microenvironment differences between the two regimens to provide a more thorough description of the ESCC microenvironment profile and serve as a foundation for customized neoadjuvant treatment of ESCC.

Feasibility and Safety of PD-1 Blockades Among Elderly Patients with Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Real-World Study.

Objective: This study aimed to identify the effectiveness and safety of PD-1 blockades among elderly patients with metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) clinically. Methods: A total of 78 elderly patients with previously treated metastatic ESCC aged ≥65 years who received PD-1 blockades monotherapy were included retrospectively. Demographic characteristics, therapeutic effectiveness and adverse reactions of the elderly patients who underwent PD-1 blockade therapy were recorded. Regular follow-up was conducted for all patients. The analysis aimed to identify potential risk factors for OS by examining the correlation between prognosis and subgroups based on baseline characteristics. Results: The median age of the 78 elderly patients was 73 years, ranging from 65 to 87 years. Among the 78 patients, 18 cases showed partial response, 26 cases had stable disease, 29 cases experienced progressive disease and 5 cases were not assessable for response, yielding an ORR of 23.1%, a DCR of 56.4%. The prognostic outcomes indicated that among the 78 patients with metastatic ESCC who received PD-1 blockades, the median PFS was 3.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.64-4.56], and the median OS was 10.9 months (95% CI: 6.02-15.78), 24-month OS rate was 22.7% (95% CI: 12.8-34.2%). In terms of the safety profile, among the 78 patients with metastatic ESCC during PD-1 blockades single-agent treatment, a total of 61 patients (78.2%) experienced any grade adverse reactions and the incidence of grade ≥3 adverse reactions were 20.5%. Briefly, the common adverse reactions manifested as fatigue (32.1%), gastrointestinal reaction (24.4%), diarrhea (19.2%), anemia (17.9%) and rash (16.7%). Overall tolerability of PD-1 blockade monotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic ESCC was acceptable and manageable. Conclusion: PD-1 blockades single agent demonstrated encouraging effectiveness and acceptable safety profile for elderly patients with previously treated metastatic ESCC in clinical practice. Prospective study should be performed to elucidate the conclusion in this study subsequently.

Final analysis of camrelizumab plus chemotherapy for untreated advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: The ESCORT-1st trial.

BACKGROUND: The interim analysis of the randomized phase 3 ESCORT-1st study demonstrated significantly longer overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for camrelizumab-chemotherapy than placebo-chemotherapy in untreated advanced/metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Here, we present the final analysis of this study and investigate potential indicators associated with OS. METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive camrelizumab (200 mg) or placebo, both in combination with up to six cycles of paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) and cisplatin (75 mg/m2). All treatments were administered intravenously every 3 weeks. The co-primary endpoints were OS and PFS assessed by the independent review committee. FINDINGS: As of April 30, 2022, the median OS was significantly longer in the camrelizumab-chemotherapy group compared to the placebo-chemotherapy group (15.6 [95% confidence interval (CI): 14.0-18.4] vs. 12.6 months [95% CI 11.2-13.8]; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.70 [95% CI 0.58-0.84]; one-sided p < 0.0001), with 3-year OS rates of 25.6% and 12.8% in the two groups, respectively. The 2-year PFS rates were 20.4% in the camrelizumab-chemotherapy group and 3.4% in the placebo-chemotherapy group. Adverse events were consistent with those reported in the interim analysis. Higher PD-L1 expression correlated with extended OS, and multivariate analysis identified sex and prior history of radiotherapy as independent indicators of OS. CONCLUSIONS: The sustained and significant improvement in efficacy with camrelizumab-chemotherapy compared to placebo-chemotherapy, along with the absence of accumulating or delayed toxicities, supports the long-term use of camrelizumab-chemotherapy as a standard therapy in untreated advanced/metastatic ESCC. FUNDING: This study was funded by Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.

Erratum: Hypoxia induced exosomal circRNA promotes metastasis of Colorectal Cancer via targeting GEF-H1/RhoA axis: Erratum.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.7150/thno.44419.].

Combinational zimberelimab plus lenvatinib and chemotherapy for alpha-fetoprotein elevated, advanced gastric cancer patients (AFPGC): a phase 1 dose-escalation study.

BACKGROUND: Alpha-fetoprotein elevated gastric cancer (AFPGC) got growing interests for its aggressive nature and unfavorable prognosis. Here, a phase 1 dose escalation study was conducted to evaluate safety and efficacy of zimberelimab (GLS-010, anti-PD-1) plus lenvatinib and chemotherapy (XELOX) as the first-line treatment for AFPGC. METHODS: Histologically confirmed HER2-negative, advanced GC patients with elevated serum AFP level (≥ 20 ng/ml) were screened. Using a 3 + 3 dose escalation design, patients were administered varying doses of lenvatinib (12, 16, 20 mg) with GLS-010 and XELOX. The primary endpoints were safety and determination of recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and disease control rate. RESULTS: Nine patients were enrolled with no dose-limiting toxicities observed. Most frequent treatment-related AEs were fatigue (55.6%), hand-foot syndrome (55.6%) and rash (55.6%), and no grade ≥ 4 AEs were reported. All patients exhibited disease control with ORR reaching 33.3%. The median PFS and OS reached 7.67 months (95% CI 4.07-11.27) and 13.17 months (95% CI 2.78-23.56), respectively. Serum AFP level was found correlated with therapeutic responses. Further 16s rRNA sequencing analysis demonstrated altered gut microbiota with elevated abundance of Lachnospiraceae bacterium-GAM79 and Roseburia hominis A2-183. CONCLUSIONS: GLS-010 plus lenvatinib and XELOX demonstrated a manageable safety profile with promising efficacy for AFPGC. With RP2D of lenvatinib determined as 16 mg, further expansion cohort is now ongoing. Translational investigation suggested that serum AFP can be indictive for therapeutic responses and certain microbiota species indicating favorable responses to immunotherapy was elevated after the combinational treatment.

Anti-PD-L1 antibody TQB2450 combined with tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitor AL2846 for immunotherapy-refractory advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A prospective phase 1b cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Effective systemic therapy remains limited for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), particularly after prior failed treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Theoretically, a combination of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with ICIs may restore immunotherapy sensitivity. METHODS: In this phase 1b study, patients received AL2846, an antiangiogenic TKI with multiple targets (c-MET, VEGFR1, c-KIT, Axl, RET, KDR, and VEGFR3), in combination with an anti-PD-L1 antibody (TQB2450) until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, death, or discontinuation for any cause. The primary end points included overall response rate (ORR) and safety, with secondary end points encompassing progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), and duration of response. RESULTS: Between November 2021 and September 2022, 18 patients with ESCC and 15 patients with HCC, whose ORR was 11.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.1%-32.8%) and 0%, respectively, were enrolled. Adverse events (AEs) of any grade and treatment-related AEs were documented in 32 patients (97.0%) and 31 patients (93.9%), respectively. Grade 3 or higher AEs were observed in 10 patients (30.3%), with vomiting (6.1%) and infectious pneumonia (9.1%) being the most prevalent. Median PFS and OS values were 3.22 months (95% CI, 1.35-5.68 months) and 5.98 months (95% CI, 3.71-8.87 months), respectively, in patients with ESCC, and 5.55 months (95% CI, 2.66 months to not evaluable [NE]) and 16.72 months (95% CI, 4.86 months to NE), respectively, in patients with HCC. The DCRs were 66.7% (95% CI, 43.75%-83.72%) in patients with ESCC and 73.3% (95% CI, 48.05%-89.10%) in patients with HCC. CONCLUSIONS: Combined TQB2450 and AL2846 therapy exhibited a favorable safety profile in immunotherapy-refractory patients with advanced ESCC and HCC.

Tyrosine phosphatase SHP2 aggravates tumor progression and glycolysis by dephosphorylating PKM2 in gastric cancer.

Gastric cancer (GC) is among the most lethal human malignancies, yet it remains hampered by challenges in fronter of molecular-guided targeted therapy to direct clinical treatment strategies. The protein tyrosine phosphatase Src homology 2 domain-containing phosphatase 2 (SHP2) is involved in the malignant progression of GC. However, the detailed mechanisms of the posttranslational modifications of SHP2 remain poorly understood. Herein, we demonstrated that an allosteric SHP2 inhibitor, SHP099, was able to block tumor proliferation and migration of GC by dephosphorylating the pyruvate kinase M2 type (PKM2) protein. Mechanistically, we found that PKM2 is a bona fide target of SHP2. The dephosphorylation and activation of PKM2 by SHP2 are necessary to exacerbate tumor progression and GC glycolysis. Moreover, we demonstrated a strong correlation between the phosphorylation level of PKM2 and adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP)-activated protein kinase (AMPK) in GC cells. Notably, the low phosphorylation expression of AMPK was negatively correlated with activated SHP2. Besides, we proved that cisplatin could activate SHP2 and SHP099 increased sensitivity to cisplatin in GC. Taken together, our results provide evidence that the SHP2/PKM2/AMPK axis exerts a key role in GC progression and glycolysis and could be a viable therapeutic approach for the therapy of GC.

Effect of different exercise modalities on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Physical exercise intervention can significantly improve the liver of patients with Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), but it is unknown which exercise mode has the best effect on liver improvement in NAFLD patients. Therefore, we systematically evaluated the effect of exercise therapy on liver and blood index function of NAFLD patients through network meta-analysis (NMA). Through systematic retrieval of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EBSCO, and CNKI (National Knowledge Infrastructure), two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies by means of databases from inception to January 2023. The NMA was performed using the inconsistency model. A total of 43 studies, 2070 NAFLD patients were included: aerobic training (n = 779), resistance training (n = 159), high-intensity interval training (n = 160), aerobic training + resistance training (n = 96). The results indicate that aerobic training + resistance training could significantly improve serum total cholesterol (TC) (Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) = 71.7), triglyceride (TG) (SUCRA = 96.8), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (SUCRA = 86.1) in patients with NAFLD including triglycerides. Aerobic training is the best mode to improve ALT (SUCRA = 83.9) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (SUCRA = 72.3). Resistance training is the best mode to improve aspartate transaminase (AST) (SUCRA = 81.7). Taking various benefits into account, we believe that the best modality of exercise for NAFLD patients is aerobic training + resistance training. In our current network meta-analysis, these exercise methods have different effects on the six indicators of NAFLD, which provides some reference for further formulating exercise prescription for NAFLD patients.

Chemotherapy re-use versus anti-angiogenic monotherapy as the third-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a real-world cohort study.

BACKGROUND: There are various recommendations for third-line treatment in mCRC, however, there is no consensus on who is more suitable for particular strategy. Chemotherapy re-use in third-line setting is a common option in clinical practice. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of third-line chemotherapy re-use by the comparison with that of anti-angiogenic monotherapy, and further find the population more suitable for third-line chemotherapy. METHODS: Using electronic medical records of patients with mCRC, a retrospective cohort study was conducted. A total of 143 patients receiving chemotherapy and 40 patients receiving anti-angiogenic monotherapy in third-line setting as control group were retrospectively collected. Baseline characteristics were analyzed using the χ² test or the Fisher's exact test. ROC curve and surv_cutpoint function of 'survminer' package in R software were used to calculate the cut-off value. Survival curves were plotted with the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared using the log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to analyze the potential risk factors. RESULTS: A total of 143 patients receiving chemotherapy and 40 patients receiving anti-angiogenic monotherapy in third-line setting were retrospectively collected. Chemotherapy rechallenge was recorded in 93 patients (93/143, 65.0%), and the remaining patients chose new chemotherapeutic drugs that had not been previously used, including irinotecan-based (22/50), oxaliplatin-based (9/50), raltitrexed (9/50), gemcitabine (5/50) and other agents (5/50). The ORR and DCR of third-line chemotherapy reached 8.8%, 61.3%, respectively (anti-angiogenic monotherapy group: ORR 2.6%, DCR 47.4%). The mPFS and mOS of patients receiving chemotherapy were 4.9 and 12.0 m, respectively (anti-angiogenic monotherapy group: mPFS 2.7 m, mOS 5.2 m). Subgroup analyses found that patients with RAS/RAF mutation, longer PFS (greater than 10.6 m) in front-line treatment or larger tumor burden had better prognosis with third-line chemotherapy rather than anti-angiogenic monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Third-line chemotherapy re-use was effective in mCRC. Those with more aggressive characteristics (RAS/RAF mutant, larger tumor burden) or better efficacy of previous chemotherapy (longer PFS) were more appropriate for third-line chemotherapy, rather than anti-angiogenic monotherapy.

A real-world observation on thrombopoietic agents for patients with cancer treatment-induced thrombocytopenia in China: A multicenter, cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Studies on various thrombopoietic agents for cancer treatment-induced thrombocytopenia (CTIT) in China are lacking. This study aimed to provide detailed clinical profiles to understand the outcomes and safety of different CTIT treatment regimens. METHODS: In this retrospective, cross-sectional study, 1664 questionnaires were collected from 33 hospitals between March 1 and July 1, 2021. Patients aged >18 years were enrolled who were diagnosed with CTIT and treated with recombinant interleukin 11 (rhIL-11), recombinant thrombopoietin (rhTPO), or a thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA). The outcomes, compliance, and safety of different treatments were analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 1437 analyzable cases, most patients were treated with either rhTPO alone (49.3%) or rhIL-11 alone (27.0%). The most common combination regimen used was rhTPO and rhIL-11 (10.9%). Platelet transfusions were received by 117 cases (8.1%). In multivariate analysis, rhTPO was associated with a significantly lower proportion of platelet recovery, platelet transfusion, and hospitalization due to chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) than rhIL-11 alone. No significant difference was observed in the time taken to achieve a platelet count of >100 × 109/L and chemotherapy dose reduction due to CIT among the different thrombopoietic agents. The outcomes of thrombocytopenia in 170 patients who received targeted therapy and/or immunotherapy are also summarized. The results show that the proportion of platelet recovery was similar among the different thrombopoietic agents. No new safety signals related to thrombopoietic agents were observed in this study. A higher proportion of physicians preferred to continue treatment with TPO-RA alone than with rhTPO and rhIL-11. CONCLUSIONS: This survey provides an overview of CTIT and the application of various thrombopoietic agents throughout China. Comparison of monotherapy with rhIL-11, rhTPO, and TPO-RA requires further randomized clinical trials. The appropriate application for thrombopoietic agents should depend on the pretreatment of platelets, treatment variables, and risk of bleeding. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: To provide an overview of the outcome of cancer treatment-induced thrombocytopenia in China, our cross-sectional study analyzed 1437 cases treated with different thrombopoietic agents. Most of the patients were treated with recombinant interleukin 11 (rhIL-11) and recombinant thrombopoietin (rhTPO). rhTPO was associated with a significantly lower proportion of platelet recovery and platelet transfusion compared with rhIL-11.

Efficacy, safety and genomic analysis of SCT200, an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody, in patients with fluorouracil, irinotecan and oxaliplatin refractory RAS and BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase â ¡ study.

BACKGROUND: Limited therapeutic options are available for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients after failure of first- and second-line therapies, representing an unmet medical need for novel therapies. METHODS: This is an open-label, single arm, multicenter, phase Ⅱ study aiming to perform the efficacy, safety and genomic analysis of SCT200, a noval fully humanized IgG1 anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody, in patients with fluorouracil, irinotecan and oxaliplatin refractory RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC. SCT200 (6 mg/kg) was given weekly for the first six weeks, followed by a higher dose of 8 mg/kg every two weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was independent review committee (IRC)-assessed objective response rate (ORR) and secondary endpoints included ORR in patients with left-sided tumor, disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), time to response (TTR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. FINDINGS: From February 12, 2018 to December 1, 2019, a total of 110 patients aged between 26 and 77 years (median: 55; interquartile range [IQR]: 47-63) with fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan refractory RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC were enrolled from 22 hospitals in China. As the data cut-off date on May 15, 2020, the IRC-assessed ORR and DCR was 31% (34/110, 95% confidence interval [CI] 22-40%) and 75% (82/110, 95% CI 65-82%), respectively. Thirty one percent (34/110) patients achieved confirmed partial response (PR). The median PFS and median OS were 5.1 months (95% CI 3.4-5.2) and 16.2 months (95% CI 11.1-not available [NA]), respectively. The most common ≥ grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were hypomagnesemia (17%, 19/110) and acneiform dermatitis (11%, 12/110). No deaths occurred. Genomic analysis suggested positive association between MYC amplification and patients' response (P = 0.0058). RAS/RAF mutation and MET amplification were the most frequently detected resistance mechanisms. Patients with high circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) at baseline or without ctDNA clearance at the 7th week after the first dose of SCT200 administration before receiving SCT200 had worse PFS and OS. INTERPRETATION: SCT200 exhibited promising clinical efficacy and manageable safety profiles in RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC patients progressed on fluorouracil, irinotecan and oxaliplatin treatment. The baseline ctDNA and ctDNA clearance status at the 7th week after the first dose of SCT200 administration before receiving SCT200 could be a potential prognostic biomarker for RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC patients with SCT200 therapy. FUNDING: This study was sponsored by Sinocelltech Ltd., Beijing, China and partly supported by the National Science and Technology Major Project for Key New Drug Development (2019ZX09732001-006, 2017ZX09304015).

[Retracted] Effects of miR­138­5p and miR­204­5p on the migration and proliferation of gastric cancer cells by targeting EGFR.

Following the publication of the above paper, it was drawn to the Editor's attention by a concerned reader that the numerous immunohistochemical images shown in Fig. 1D on p. 2626 exhibited a number of overlaps comparing among the data panels, such that data which were intended to show the results from differently performed experiments were likely to have been derived from a smaller number of original sources. A subsequent independent investigation of the data in this paper in the Editorial Office also revealed that certain of the cell migration and invasion assay data shown in Fig. 4A on p. 2629 were strikingly similar to data that had previously appeared in a couple of already published papers written by different authors at different research institutes.  Owing to the fact that the contentious data in Fig. 4 in the above article had already been published prior to its submission to Oncology Reports, in addition to the matter of several panels in Fig. 1D showing overlapping data, the Editor has decided that this paper should be retracted from the Journal. The authors were asked for an explanation to account for these concerns, but the Editorial Office did not receive a reply. The Editor apologizes to the readership for any inconvenience caused. [Oncology Reports 39: 2624-2634, 2018; DOI: 10.3892/or.2018.6389].

Advances in medical treatment of advanced hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancer in 2022.

This article summarizes the drug therapy progress of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, biliary tract cancer, and pancreatic cancer in 2022, including chemotherapy, molecular targeted therapy, and immunotherapy, to provide reference information for current clinical treatment and future clinical research, and to better improve prognosis and quality of life in patients with hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancer.

Phase Ib study of anti-EGFR antibody (SCT200) in combination with anti-PD-1 antibody (SCT-I10A) for patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody (SCT200) and an anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) antibody (SCT-I10A) as third-line or subsequent therapies in patients with rat sarcoma viral oncogene (RAS)/v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF) wild-type (wt) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, open-label, phase Ib clinical trial. Patients with histologically confirmed RAS/BRAF wt mCRC with more than two lines of treatment were enrolled and treated with SCT-I10A and SCT200. The primary endpoints were the objective response rate (ORR) and safety. The secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were enrolled in the study through January 28, 2023. The ORR was 28.57% and the DCR was 85.71% (18/21). The median PFS and OS were 4.14 and 12.84 months, respectively. The treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were tolerable. Moreover, compared with the monotherapy cohort from our previous phase I study evaluating SCT200 for RAS/BRAF wt mCRC in a third-line setting, no significant improvements in PFS and OS were observed in the combination group. CONCLUSIONS: SCT200 combined with SCT-I10A demonstrated promising efficacy in previously treated RAS/BRAF wt mCRC patients with an acceptable safety profile. Further head-to-head studies with larger sample sizes are needed to validate whether the efficacy and safety of combined anti-EGFR and anti-PD-1 therapy are superior to anti-EGFR monotherapy in the third-line setting. (Registration No. NCT04229537).

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and efficacy of pemigatinib (a selective inhibitor of fibroblast growth factor receptor 1-3) monotherapy in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors: a phase i clinical trial.

Pemigatinib is a selective fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)1-3 inhibitor and has demonstrated acceptable tolerability and clinical activity in advanced solid tumors in Western population. This phase I trial evaluated pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) characteristics, preliminary safety and efficacy of pemigatinib in Chinese patients with advanced, solid tumors. Patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic solid tumors bearing FGF/FGFR1-3 alterations received oral pemigatinib at 13.5 mg once daily (QD) on a 2-weeks-on/1-week-off schedule. The primary endpoint was PK/PD characteristics; secondary endpoints were safety and efficacy. Twelve patients were enrolled (median age: 61 years, 58.3% males). PK data demonstrated pemigatinib (13.5 mg QD) was rapidly absorbed with a geometric mean elimination half-life of 11.3 h. The geometric mean values of maximum serum concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h at steady state were 215.1 nmol/L and 2636.9 h·nmol/L, respectively. The mean clearance adjusted by bioavailability at steady state was low (11.8 L/h), and the apparent oral volume of distribution was moderate (170.5 L). The PD marker, serum phosphate level, increased on days 8 and 15 of cycle 1 (mean: 2.25 mg/dL, CV% [percent coefficient of variation]: 31.3%) and decreased to baseline post 1 week off. Three (25.0%) patients experienced grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events. Partial response was confirmed in one patient with FGFR1-mutant esophageal carcinoma and one with FGFR2-mutant cholagiocarcinoma. Pemigatinib had similar PK/PD characteristics to Western population and demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and potential anti-cancer benefit in Chinese patients with FGF/FGFR1-3 altered, advanced, solid tumor. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04258527 [prospectively registered February 6, 2020]).

Third-line treatment patterns and clinical outcomes for metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective real-world study.

Background: There are multiple recommendations on the third-line therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC); however, no consensus has been reached. Objectives: This study aimed to explore the patient demographics and the real-world third-line treatment landscape of mCRC. Design: A retrospective real-world cohort study. Methods: Electronic medical records of mCRC patients from Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital between 2013 and 2020 were collected. Upon descriptive, comparative, and survival analyses, a retrospective study was conducted to describe demographics and clinical outcomes of mCRC patients receiving third-line treatment. Results: Among 218 mCRC patients receiving third-line therapy, 65.5% received chemotherapy combined with or without targeted drugs, followed by anti-angiogenic monotherapy (18.4%), anti-epidermal growth factor receptor drugs (6.9%) and immunotherapy (6.4%). The overall response rate and disease control rate reached 10.2% and 59.2%, respectively; and median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 4.0 m and 10.7 m, respectively. After Cox multivariate analysis, we found that therapeutic regime was an independent prognostic factor. Compared to patients receiving anti-angiogenic monotherapy, those receiving chemotherapy combined with or without targeted drugs exhibited better prognosis. For patients whose PFS were longer in the front-line treatment, the PFS of third-line therapy was also relatively longer (p = 0.023). Multiple types of therapies (>3, p = 0.002) or multiple drugs (>5, p = 0.024) in the whole-course management of mCRC are indicators of longer survival. Conclusion: Chemotherapy combined with or without targeted therapy remained dominated third-line choice and showed favorable efficacy compared with anti-angiogenic monotherapy. With the application of more types and quantities of effective drugs, patients would achieve better survival.

Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of an anti-LAG-3 antibody SHR-1802 in patients with advanced solid tumors: a phase I dose-escalation and dose-expansion study.

Background: Lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3), a checkpoint molecule contributing to immune suppressive microenvironment, is regarded as a promising target in cancer treatment. SHR-1802 is a novel anti-LAG-3 monoclonal antibody. Objectives: To evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of SHR-1802. Design: A phase I dose-escalation and expansion trial of SHR-1802 in patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: Patients with confirmed advanced solid tumors who failed previous standard-of-care or for whom no effective therapy was available were enrolled to receive SHR-1802 once every 21-day cycle. Dose escalation was performed in an accelerated titration design followed by a 3 + 3 scheme at escalating doses from 0.3 to 10 mg/kg. On the basis of results from dose-escalation phase, one or two dose levels were expanded to establish the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). The primary end points were dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and RP2D. Results: Between 01 July 2020, and 07 September 2021, 28 patients were enrolled. No DLTs were observed, and all doses investigated were well tolerated. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 20 patients (71.4%), all grade 1 or 2, with the most common ones being anemia (14.3%), asthenia (14.3%), electrocardiogram QT prolonged (14.3%), followed by increased blood fibrinogen (10.7%), infusion-related reaction (10.7%), and hypoalbuminemia (10.7%). No adverse event-related discontinuation occurred. Three patients died from adverse events, but none of the deaths were deemed related to study treatment. SHR-1802 exposure enhanced with the increasing doses in a greater than dose-proportional manner over the investigated dose range. The disease control rate was 32.0% (95% CI 14.9%-53.5%). The median progression-free survival was 2.0 months (95% CI 1.2-6.1). Conclusions: SHR-1802 demonstrated a tolerable safety profile and preliminary antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors. Further studies with larger sample size and in combination forms are warranted for future clinical application. Registration ClinicalTrialsgov: NCT04414150.